Behind closed doors: How advanced cancer couples communicate at home

References

• National Alliance for Caregiving. Cancer Caregiving in the US – An Intense, Episodic, and Challenging Care Experience. National Alliance for Caregiving in Partnership with the National Cancer Institute Cancer Support Community; 2016. http://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CancerCaregivingReport_FINAL_June-17-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Traa MJ, De Vries J, Bodenmann G, Den Oudsten BL. Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: a systematic review. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:85–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG. Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35:230–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kershaw T, Ellis KR, Yoon H, Schafenacker A, Katapodi M, Northouse L. The interdependence of advanced cancer patients' and their family caregivers' mental health, physical health, and self-efficacy over time. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49:901–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyler D, Stimpson JP, Peek MK. Health concordance within couples: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. (1982) 2007;64(11):2297–2310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer2008;112:2541–2555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Loke AY. A literature review on the mutual impact of the spousal caregiver-cancer patients dyads: ‘communication', ‘reciprocal influence', and ‘caregiver-patient congruence'. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18:58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology2006;15(3):234–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer SL, Rudd ME, Syrjala KL. Protective buffering and emotional desynchrony among spousal caregivers of cancer patients. Health Psychol. 2007;26(5):635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Norton TR, Ostroff JS, Winkel G, Fox K, Grana G. Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: the moderating role of relationship satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(3):380–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne S, Kashy DA, Siegel S, Myers Virtue S, Heckman C, Ryan D. Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. J Fam Psychol. 2014;28(2):214–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, Falconier M, Kissane D, Levesque JV. Couples coping with cancer: exploration of theoretical frameworks from dyadic studies. Psycho-oncology 2015;24(12):1605–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H. New frontiers in couple-based interventions in cancer care: refining the prescription for spousal communication. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(2):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2013;22(8):1688–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Loke AY. A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psycho-Oncol. 2014;23(7):731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King DB, DeLongis A. When couples disconnect: rumination and withdrawal as maladaptive responses to everyday stress. J Fam Psychol. 2014;28(4):460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt P, Witt PL, Shimkowski JR. A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Commun Monogr. 2014;81(1), 28–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith DJ, Miller LE, Caughlin JP. Openness and avoidance in couples communicating about cancer. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2007;31(1):62–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Sherman KA. Communication avoidance, coping and psychological distress of women with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2015;38(3):565–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins ML, López AM, Weihs KL, Mehl MR. Cancer conversations in context: naturalistic observation of couples coping with breast cancer. J Fam Psychol. 2014;28(3):380–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Survivor. 2010;4(1):74–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos B, Graesch AP, Repetti R, Bradbury T, Ochs E. Opportunity for interaction? A naturalistic observation study of dual-earner families after work and school. J Fam Psychol. 2009;23(6):798–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reblin M, Heyman RE, Ellington L, Baucom BRW, Georgiou PG, Vadaparampil ST. Everyday couples' communication research: Overcoming methodological barriers with technology. Education and Counseling. 2018;101(3):551–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey CL, Larson BM, Zumtobel DC, Christensen A. The communication patterns questionnaire: the reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale. J Marriage Fam. 1996;58(3):796–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futris TG, Campbell K, Nielsen RB, Burwell SR. The communication patterns questionnaire-short form: a review and assessment. Fam J. 2010;18(3):275–287.
   Google Scholar
• Ransom S, Azzarello LM, McMillan SC. Methodological issues in the recruitment of cancer pain patients and their caregivers. Res Nurs Health 2006;29(3):190–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T. Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health 2006;29(3):199–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber EC, Laurenceau J-P, Miga E, Chango J, Coan J. Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts. J Family Psychol. 2011;25(4):541–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden LC, Schiller M, Dickstein S, et al. Levels of family assessment: I. Family, marital, and parent–child interaction. J Fam Psychol. 1998;12(1):7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman JM. Marital interaction: experimental investigations. Oxford, England: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ickes W. Methods of studying close relationships. In: Weber AL, Harvey JH, eds. Perspectives on Close Relationships. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1994:18–44.
   Google Scholar
• Themessl-Huber M, Humphris G, Dowell J, Macgillivray S, Rushmer R, Williams B. Audio-visual recording of patient-GP consultations for research purposes: a literature review on recruiting rates and strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(2):157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Siegel S, Kashy D, Heckman CJ. Cancer-specific relationship awareness, relationship communication, and intimacy among couples coping with early-stage breast cancer. J Soc Pers Relat. 2014;31(3):314–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone KM, Isaacowitz DM. Attention, emotion, and well-being: an adult lifespan perspective. In: Robinson MD, Eid M, eds. The Happy Mind: Cognitive Contributions to Well-Being. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017:23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brittany KJ, Brooke CF. Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: a theoretical model and review of the research. Person Soc Psychol Rev. 2017;21(3):228–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts JK, Yoshimura CG, Rabby M, Loschiavo R. Mapping the topography of couples’ daily conversation. J Soc Pers Relat. 2005;22(3):299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SJ, Martire LM, Zhaoyang R. Couples’ day-to-day pain concordance and marital interaction quality. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim R, Goldzweig G, Mashiach-Eizenberg M, et al. Correlates of concealment behavior among couples coping with cancer: actor partner model. Psycho-Oncol. 2018;27(2):583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, et al. Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: a qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Counsel. 2016;99(7):1146–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruess CJS, Pearson JC. Interpersonal rituals in marriage and adult friendship. Commun Monogr. 1997;64(1):25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzelman K, Kent EE, Rowland JH. Social factors in informal cancer caregivers: the interrelationships among social stressors, relationship quality, and family functioning in the CanCORS data set. Cancer 2016;122(2):278–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH, et al. Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer2009;115(S18):4326–4338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith DJ, Miller GA. Conceptualizing how couples talk about cancer. Health Commun. 2014;29:51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar