The influence of relational mutuality on dyadic coping among couples facing breast cancer

References

• American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):271–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revenson T, Kayser K, Bodenmann G. Couples Coping with Stress. Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Falconier MK, Randall AK, Bodenmann G. Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Watson L, Andrade J. Cancer as a "We-Disease": Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Fam Syst Health. 2007;25(4):404–418. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404
   Google Scholar
• Revenson T. Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1994;16:122–130.
   Google Scholar
• Martin M, Peter-Wight M, Braun M, Hornung R, Scholz U. The 3-phase-model of dyadic adaptation to dementia: Why it might sometimes be better to be worse. Eur J Ageing. 2009;6(4):291–301. doi:10.1007/s10433-009-0129-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martire LM, Schulz R. Involving family in psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(2):90–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martire LM. Couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness: Where do we go from here? J Soc Pers Relat. 2013;30(2):207–214. doi:10.1177/0265407512453786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilchinsky N, Haze-Filderman L, Leibowitz M, Reges O, Khaskia A, Mosseri M. Spousal support and cardiac patients' distress: The moderating role of attachment orientation. J Fam Psychol. 2010;24(4):508–512. doi:10.1037/a0020009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne JC, Smith DAF. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. J Fam Psychol. 1994;8(1):43–54. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.8.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Parris Stephens AM, Hemphill RC, Rook KS, Franks MM. It sometimes takes two. In: Agnew CR, South SC, eds. Interpersonal Relationships and Health: Social and Clinical Psychological Mechanisms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2014:109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni A, Donato S, Graffigna G, Barello S, Parise M. Engaged patients, engaged partnerships: Singles and partners dealing with an acute cardiac event. Psychol Health Med. 2014;5:505–517. doi:10.1080/13548506.2014.969746
   Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Sormanti M, Strainchamps E. Women coping with cancer: The influence of relationship factors on psychosocial adjustment. Psychol Women Q. 1999;23(4):725–739. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Cheung PKH, Rao N, Chan YCL, Chan Y, Lo PHY. The influence of culture on couples coping with breast cancer: A comparative analysis of couples from China, India, and the United States. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(3):264–288.doi:10.1080/07347332.2014.897292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne J, Fiske V. Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In: Parris Stephens MA, Hobfoll SE, Crowther J, eds. Family Health Psychology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992:129–149.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien TB, DeLongis A. Coping with chronic stress. In: Gottlieb BH, ed. Coping with Chronic Stress. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1997:161–190.
   Google Scholar
• Revenson TA. Scenes from a marriage: Examining support, coping, and gender within the context of chronic illness. In: Suls J, Wallston K, eds. Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2009:530–559.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, UK: Springer; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, Bodenmann G, eds. Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005:35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan JV, Hartling LM, Walker M. The Complexity of Connection: Writings from the Stone Center's Jean Baker Miller Training Institute. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JB. How change happens: Controlling images, mutuality, and power. Women Ther. 2008;31:109–127. doi:10.1080/02703140802146233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JB. Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Genero NP, Baker Miller J, Surrey J, M, Baldwin L. Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the Mutual Psychological Development Questionnaire. J Fam Psychol. 1992;6:36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Frey LL, Beesley D, Hurst R, Saldana S, Licuanan B. Instrumentality, expressivity, and relational qualities in the same‐sex friendships of college women and men. J Coll Couns. 2016;19(1):17–30. doi:10.1002/jocc.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman B, Broussard CA. The Influence of relational factors on men's adjustment to their partners' newly-diagnosed breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;23(2–3):23–43. doi:10.1300/J077v23n02_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve S, Singer JA, Skerrett K, Wein S. Coding “We-ness” in couple’s relationship stories: A method for assessing mutuality in couple therapy. Psychother Res. 2017;27(3):313–325. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1262566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid DW, Dalton EJ, Laderoute K, Doell FK, Nguyen T. Therapeutically induced changes in couple identity: The role of we-ness and interpersonal processing in relationship satisfaction. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2006;132(3):241–284. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.3.241-288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jory B, Anderson D. Intimate justice II: Fostering mutuality, reciprocity, and accommodation in therapy for psychological abuse. J Marital Fam Ther. 1999;25(3):349–364. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1999.tb00253.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Randall AK, Falconier MK. Coping in couples: The Systemic Transactional Model (STM). In: Bodenmann G, Randall AK, Falconier MK, eds. Couples Coping with Stress. A Cross-cultural Perspective. New York and London: Routledge; 2016:5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne LC. The epigenesis of relational systems: A model for understanding family development. Fam Process. 1984;23(3):297–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coan J, Kasle S, Jackson A, Schaefer H, J, Davidson R. Mutuality and the social regulation of neural threat responding. Attach Hum Dev. 2013;15(3):303–315. doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.782656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang B, Tracy A, Taylor C, Williams L, V, Jordan J, Baker Miller J. The relational health indices: A study of women's relationships. Psychol Women Q. 2002;26(1):25–35. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Testmanual. Bern, Göttingen: Huber & Hogrefe; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Randall AK, Hilpert P, Jimenez-Arista LE, Walsh KJ, Bodenmann G. Dyadic Coping in the U.S.: Psychometric properties and validity for use of the English Version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Curr Psychol. 2016;35(4):570–582. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9323-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashy DA, Snyder DK. Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):338–348. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny DA. Models of non-independence in dyadic research. J Soc Pers Relat. 1996;13(2):279–294. doi:10.1177/0265407596132007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer MS, Baucom DH, Baucom BR, et al. Emotional arousal predicts observed social support in German and American couples talking about breast cancer. J Fam Psychol. 2015;29(5):744–754. doi:10.1037/fam0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorros SM, Card NA, Segrin C, Badger TA. Interdepence in women with breast cancer and their partners: An interindividual model of distress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010;78(1):121–125. doi:10.1037/a0017724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG. Quality of life in couples dealing with cancer: Dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):230–238. doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9026-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MS, Kim K, Lim C, Kim J. Posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors and their husbands based on the actor –partner interdependence model. Psychooncology 2017;26(10):1586–1592. doi:10.1002/pon.4343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis M, Bodenmann G, Bradbury T, et al. Commitment and dyadic coping in long-term relationships. GeroPsych. 2014;27(4):139–149. doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000112
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann GD. Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 1997;47:137–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato S, Parise M, Iafrate R, Bertoni A, Finkenauer C, Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping responses and partners' perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. J Soc Pers Relat. 2015;32(5):580–600. doi:10.1177/0265407514541071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffieux M, Nussbeck F, Bodenmann G. Long-term prediction of relationship satisfaction and stability by stress, coping, communication, and well-being. J Divorce Remarriage. 2014;55(6):485–501. doi:10.1080/10502556.2014.931767
   Google Scholar
• Didymus F, Staff H, Backhouse S. The antecedents and outcomes of dyadic coping in close personal relationships: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Anxiety Stress Cop. 2017;30(5):498–520.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G, Pihet S, Kayser K. The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20(3):485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Wiebe D, Butner J. Affect covariation in marital couples dealing with stressors surrounding prostate cancer. Gerontology 2011;57(2):167–172. doi:10.1159/000318642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin KM, Swank PR, Vaeth P, Ostwald SK. The longitudinal and dyadic effects of mutuality on perceived stress for stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(4):423–431. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.756457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons KS, Sayer AG, Archbold PG, Hornbrook MC, Stewart BJ. The enduring and contextual effects of physical health and depression on care-dyad mutuality. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(1):84–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons KS, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG, Carter JH. Optimism, pessimism, mutuality, and gender: Predicting 10-year role strain in Parkinson's disease spouses. Gerontologist. 2009;49(3):378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park EO, Schumacher KL. The state of the science of family caregiver-care receiver mutuality: A systematic review. Nurs Inq. 2014;21(2):140–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(6):375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneeshaw MF, Considine RM, Jennings J. Mutuality and preparedness of family caregivers for elderly women after bypass surgery. Appl Nurs Res. 1999;12(3):128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halm M, Bakas T. Factors associated with caregiver depressive symptoms, outcomes, and perceived physical health following coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22(6):508–515. doi:10.1097/01.JCN.0000297388.21626.6c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanji H, Anderson KE, Gruber‐Baldini AL, et al. Mutuality of the marital relationship in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(13):1843–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostwald SK, Bernal MP, Cron SG, Godwin K. Stress experienced by stroke survivors and spousal caregivers during the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(2):93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Reid DW. Enhancing the relationship adjustment of South Asian Canadian couples using a Systemic-Constructivist Approach to couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016;42(4):615–629. doi:10.1111/jmft.12161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology 2013;22(8):1688–1704. doi:10.1002/pon.3200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbane MD, Wells MA. Toward relational empowerment: interpersonal neurobiology, couples, and the societal context. In: Knudson-Martin C, Wells MA, Samman SK, eds. Socio-emotional Relationship Therapy: Bridging Emotion, societal Context, and Couple Interaction. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015:27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Feldman BN, Borstelmann NA, Daniels AA. Effects of a randomized couple-based intervention on quality of life of breast cancer patients and their partners. Social Work Research 2010;34:20–32. doi:10.1093/swr/34.1.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar