Partner presence in clinical conversations about sexual health: Breast cancer survivors’, partners’, and providers’ perspectives of triadic interactions

References

• American Cancer Society, Cancer Treatment & Survivorship Facts & Figures 2019-2021. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2019:1–48. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/survivor-facts-figures.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schover LR, van der Kaaij M, van Dorst E, Creutzberg C, Huyghe E, Kiserud CE. Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment. EJC Suppl. 2014;12(1):41–53. doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakht S, Najafi S. Body image and sexual dysfunctions: Comparison between breast cancer patients and healthy women. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2010;5:1493–1497. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.314
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins Y, Ussher J, Gilbert E, Perz J, Sandoval M, Sundquist K. Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: The experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32(4):271–280. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5a93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzona MR, Fisher CL, Ledford C. Perpetuating the cycle of silence: The intersection of uncertainty and sexual health communication among couples after breast cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(2):659–668. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4369-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb SB, Dickler M, Sit L, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer: Prevalence and severity. JCO. 2009;27(15_suppl):9558–9558. doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.9558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivieso M, Kujawa AM, Jones T, Baker LH. Cancer survivors in the United States: A review of the literature and a call to action. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(2):163–173. doi:10.7150/ijms.3827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzick J, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, et al. Forbes, Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Extended long-term follow-up of the IBIS-I breast cancer prevention trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):67–75. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71171-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin M, Vezina L, Verreault R, et al. Family physician involvement in cancer care fol- low-up: The experience of a cohort of patients with lung cancer. Ann Family Med. 2010;8(6):526–532. doi:10.1370/afm.1171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzona MR, Fisher CL, Wright KB, Ledford C. Talking about sexual health during survivorship: understanding what shapes breast cancer survivors’ willingness to communicate with providers. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(6):932–942. doi:10.1007/s11764-019-00809-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Sexuality following breast cancer. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999;25(3):237–250. doi:10.1080/00926239908403998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano CM, Leach CR, Smith TG, et al. Equitably improving outcomes for cancer survivors and supporting caregivers: A blueprint for care delivery, research, education, and policy, CA. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):35–49. doi:10.3322/caac.21548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff JL, Roter DL. Family presence in routine medical visits: A meta-analytical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):823–831. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell RC, Butow PN, Bu S, et al. Physician-patient-companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer BL, Cameron RA, DeLuca JM, Mohile SG, Epstein RM. “Speaking-for” and “speaking-as”: Pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(1):36–42. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosland AM, Piette JD, Choi H, Heisler M. Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: Patient and physician determinants and experiences. Med Care. 2011;49(1):37–45. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberlin C, Brushwood D, Allen W, Radson E, Wilson D. Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: Communication and pain management issues. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28(6):566–578. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard G, Illingworth N, Rowa-Dewar N, Forbat L, Kearney N. Treatment decision-making in cancer care: The role of the carer. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(13–14):2023–2031. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03062.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisecker AE, Brecheisen MA, Ashworth J, Hayes J. Perceptions of the role of cancer patients’ companions during medical appointments. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. 1996;14(4):29–45. doi:10.1300/J077v14n04_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speice J, Harkness J, Laneri H, et al. Involving family members in cancer care: Focus group considerations of patients and oncological providers. Psychooncology. 2000;9(2):101–112. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(200003/04)9:2<101::AID-PON435>3.0.CO;2-D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, et al. Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: A qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(7):1146–1155. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design:Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson. 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Owen WF. Interpretive themes in relational communication. Q. J. Speech. 1984;70(3):274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banning JH. Ecological sentence synthesis; 2003. http://mycahs.colostate.edu/James.H.Banning/PDFs/Ecological%20Sentence%20Synthesis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1(2):13–22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg LR. The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. Int J Qual Stud Health and Well-Being. 2006;1(3):141–148. doi:10.1080/17482620600858399
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggly S, Penner LA, Greene M, Harper F, Ruckdeschel JC, Albrecht TL. Information seeking during “bad news” oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:2074–2985. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene MG, Majerovitz SD, Adelman RD, Rizzo C. The effects of the presence of a third person on the physician-older patient medical interview . J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42(4):413–419. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07490.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson LL. The roles of companions in geriatric patient-interdisciplinary oncology team interactions. J Aging Stud. 2002;16(4):361–382. doi:10.1016/S0890-4065(02)00071-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai MH. Who gets to talk? An alternative framework evaluating companion effects in geriatric triads. Commun Med. 2007;4(1):37–49. doi:10.1515/CAM.2007.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmel G. The sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated, edited, and with an introd, by Wolff KH. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press; 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin JP. A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. J Soc Pers Relat. 2010;27(6):824–848. doi:10.1177/0265407510373262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korfage IJ, Audrey S, Hak T, Blazeby JM, Abel J, Campbell R. Recognising the importance of “family time-out” in consultations: An exploratory qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e002144–8. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar