Becoming and being a parent with an inherited predisposition to diffuse gastric cancer: A qualitative study of young adults with a CDH1 pathogenic variant

References

• Blair VR, McLeod M, Carneiro F, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):e386–e397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland SN, Lounsberry J, Pelletier G, et al. “How do you live without a stomach?”: a multiple case study examination of total gastrectomy for palliation or prophylaxis. Palliat Support Care. 2011;9(3):305–313. doi:10.1017/S1478951511000253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallowell N, Lawton J, Badger S, et al. The psychosocial impact of undergoing prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) to manage the risk of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). J Genet Couns. 2017;26(4):752–762. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-0045-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaurah P, Talhouk A, MacMillan A, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: cancer risk and the personal cost of preventive surgery. Fam Cancer. 2019;18(4):429–438. doi:10.1007/s10689-019-00133-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts G, Hardwick R, Fitzgerald RC. Decision making, quality of life and prophylactic gastrectomy in carriers of pathogenic CDH1 mutations. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worster E, Liu X, Richardson S, et al. The impact of prophylactic total gastrectomy on health-related quality of life: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):87–93. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins C, Tutty E, Purvis R, et al. Young people's experiences of a CDH1 pathogenic variant: decision-making about gastric cancer risk management. J Genet Couns. 2022;31(1):242–251. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1478
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, King LM, et al. Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer. 2009;8(4):441–449. doi:10.1007/s10689-009-9263-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell N, Badger S, Richardson S, et al. High-risk individuals’ perceptions of reproductive genetic testing for CDH1 mutations. Fam Cancer. 2017;16(4):531–535. doi:10.1007/s10689-017-9976-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Decruyenaere M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Boogaerts A, et al. The complexity of reproductive decision-making in asymptomatic carriers of the Huntington mutation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15(4):453–462. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekeuwer C, Bateman S. Much more than a gene: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, reproductive choices and family life. Med Health Care Philos. 2013;16(2):231–244. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9361-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks-Smeets IAP, Gietel-Habets JJG, Tibben A, et al. Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):1103–1112. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly LS, Watson M, Moynihan C, et al. Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(4):1006–1012. doi:10.1093/humrep/des441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ormondroyd E, Donnelly L, Moynihan C, et al. Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(1):4–10. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilsnack C, Young J, Merrill S, et al. Reproductive beliefs among families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: generations of cancer risk. J Soc Soc Work Res. 2022. [epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1086/719368
   Google Scholar
• Forbes Shepherd R, Werner-Lin A, Keogh LA, et al. Reproduction and genetic responsibility: an interpretive description of reproductive decision-making for young people with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(1):168–181. doi:10.1177/10497323211046240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallowell N. Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility. Soc Health Illness. 1999;21(5):597–621. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke T, Rüppel J. Social dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a literature review. New Genet Soc. 2019;38(1):80–112. doi:10.1080/14636778.2018.1549983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatas JC, Barlow-Stewart K, Strong KA, et al. Women's experience of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a qualitative study. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(8):771–777. doi:10.1002/pd.2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Calzone K, Fasaye G, et al. CDH1 variants leading to gastric cancer risk management decision‐making experiences in emerging adults: ‘I am not ready yet’. J Gene Coun. 2021;30(4):1091–1104. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald‐Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(2):169–177. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–544. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant A, Charmaz K. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exer Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, ed. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer; 2019:843–860.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, et al. Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. CAM J. 1998;10(2):31–36. doi:10.1177/1525822X980100020301
   Google Scholar
• eviQ. CDH1—risk management. Cancer Genetics. https://www.eviq.org.au/cancer-genetics/adult/risk-management/1090-cdh1-risk-management. Published April 28, 2021. Accessed March 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Downing C. Negotiating responsibility: case studies of reproductive decision-making and prenatal genetic testing in families facing Huntington disease. J Genet Couns. 2005;14(3):219–234. doi:10.1007/s10897-005-0619-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton R, Original R. Being young, female, and BRCA positive. Am J Nurs. 2012;112(10):26–31. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000421021.62295.3b
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeiler K. Reproductive autonomous choice—a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7(2):175–183. doi:10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034323.68025.d5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallowell N, Badger S, Richardson S, et al. An investigation of the factors effecting high-risk individuals’ decision-making about prophylactic total gastrectomy and surveillance for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Fam Cancer. 2016;15(4):665–676. doi:10.1007/s10689-016-9910-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowley E. On doing ‘being ordinary’: women’s accounts of BRCA testing and maternal responsibility. New Genet Soc. 2007;26(3):241–250. doi:10.1080/14636770701701774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kaaij RT, van Kessel JP, van Dieren JM, et al. Outcomes after prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(2):e176–e182. doi:10.1002/bjs.10754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean M, Rauscher EA. “It was an emotional baby”: previvors’ family planning decision-making styles about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(6):1301–1313. doi:10.1007/s10897-017-0069-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young M-A, Thompson K, Lewin J, et al. A framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling. J Community Genet. 2020;11(2):161–170. doi:10.1007/s12687-019-00439-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amendola LM, Golden-Grant K, Scollon S. Scaling genetic counseling in the genomics era. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2021;22(1):339–355. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-110320-121752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoll K, Kubendran S, Cohen SA. The past, present and future of service delivery in genetic counseling: keeping up in the era of precision medicine. Am J Med Genet. 2018;178(1):24–37. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31602
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland L, Young M-A, Lewin J, et al. Education in youth-friendly genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2021;30(4):1133–1142. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forbes Shepherd R, Werner-Lin A, Keogh LA, et al. “I need to know if I’m going to die young”: adolescent and young adult experiences of genetic testing for Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(1):54–73. doi:10.1080/07347332.2020.1768199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar