Development of a common dyadic coping scale in couples facing breast cancer: the importance of open communication

References

• Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29(2):169–180. doi:10.1037/a0018165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão T, Pedro J, Nunes N, Martins MV, Costa ME, Matos PM. Marital adjustment in the context of female breast cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2017;26(12):2019–2029. doi:10.1002/pon.4432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente M, Chirico I, Ottoboni G, Chattat R. Relationship dynamics among couples dealing with breast cancer: a systematic review. IJERPH. 2021;18(14):7288. 7288. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT. Cancer as a “we-disease”: examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Fam Syst Health. 2007;25(4):404–418. doi:10.1037/1091-7527.25.4.404
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York City, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss J Psychol. 1995;54:34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping—a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 1997;47:137–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(6):920–954. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentscher KE. Communal coping in couples with health problems. Front Psychol. 2019;10(398):398. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: Revenson TA, Kayser K, and Bodenmann G, eds. Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005:33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat. 1998;15(5):579–605. doi:10.1177/0265407598155001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and Coping in Couples]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenmann G. Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI): Testmanual [Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI): Test Manual]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne JC, Smith DA. Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: a contextual perspective on wives’ distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(3):404–412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg CA, Johnson MM, Meegan SP, Strough J. Collaborative problem-solving interactions in young and old married couples. Disc Process. 2003;35(1):33–58. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3501_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgeson VS, Jakubiak B, Van Vleet M, Zajdel M. Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: theory update and evidence. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018;22(2):170–195. doi:10.1177/10888683177357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh MJ, Mehl MR, Shoham V, Reilly ES, Ewy GA. Prognostic significance of spouse we talk in couples coping with heart failure. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(5):781–789. doi:10.1037/a0013238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer SL, Romano JM, Todd M, et al. Links between communication and relationship satisfaction among patients with cancer and their spouses: results of a fourteen-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study. Front Psychol. 2018;9(1843):1843. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(3):234–247. doi:10.1002/pon.941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H. Coping: a concept analysis in the cancer context. Nurs Commun. 2018;2(1):27–33. doi:10.53388/TMRIN20180311
   Google Scholar
• Lewis FM, Griffith KA, Alzawad Z, Dawson PL, Zahlis EH, Shands ME. Helping her heal: randomized clinical trial to enhance dyadic outcomes in couples. Psychooncology. 2019;28(2):430–438. doi:10.1002/pon.4966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. PSYCH. 2018;09(08):2207–2230. doi:10.4236/psych.2018.98126
   Google Scholar
• Nichols TR, Wisner PM, Cripe G, Gulabchand L. Putting the kappa statistic to use. Qual Assur J. 2010;13(3–4):57–61. doi:10.1002/qaj.481
   Google Scholar
• Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(1):3–15. doi:10.1177/096228029900800102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaujean AA. Latent Variable Modeling Using R: A Step-by-Step Guide. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Martin CR, Savage-McGlynn E. A ‘good practice’ guide for the reporting of design and analysis for psychometric evaluation. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31(5):449–455. doi:10.1080/02646838.2013.835036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çokluk Ö, Koçak D. Using Horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educ Sci Theory Pract. 2016;16(2):537–551. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.2.0328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. The Guilford Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ho SM, Chan CL, Ho RT. Posttraumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2004;13(6):377–389. doi:10.1002/pon.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Prac Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–7. 10.7275/jyj1-4868.
   Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004;33(2):261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. Br J Psychol. 2014;105(3):399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Coutts JJ. Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Commun Methods Meas. 2020;14(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Sherman KA. Communication avoidance, coping and psychological distress of women with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2015;38(3):565–577. doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9636-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen A, Heavey CL. Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(1):73–81. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan-Kicken E, Caughlin JP. A multiple goals perspective on topic avoidance and relationship satisfaction in the context of breast cancer. Commun Monogr. 2010;77(2):231–256. doi:10.1080/03637751003758219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Hurwitz H, Faber M. Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their spouses. Psychooncology. 2005;14(12):1030–1042. doi:10.1002/pon.915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconier MK, Jackson JB, Hilpert P, Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;42:28–46. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser K, Revenson TA. Including the cultural context in dyadic coping: directions for future research and practice. In: Falconier MK, Randall AK, and Bodenmann G, eds. Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group; 2016:285–299.
   Google Scholar
• Falconier MK, Randall AK, Bodenmann G. Cultural considerations in understanding dyadic coping across cultures. In: Falconier MK, Randall AK, and Bodenmann G, eds. Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016:23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith DJ, Miller LE, Caughlin JP. Openness and avoidance in couples communicating about cancer. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2007;31(1):62–115. doi:10.1080/23808985.2007.11679065
   Google Scholar