Fully Human, Fully Machine: Rhetorics of Digital Disembodiment in Programming

Works Cited

• Aching, Gerard. “The Slave’s Work: Reading Slavery through Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic.” PMLA, vol. 127, no. 4, 2012, pp. 912–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Scot and Casey Boyle. Rhetoric, through Everyday Things. U of Alabama P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, Ian. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. MIT P, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Booher, Amanda K. and Julie Jung, editors. Feminist Rhetorical Science Studies: Human Bodies, Posthuman Worlds. Southern Illinois UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey. Rhetoric as a Posthuman Practice. Ohio State UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, Kevin. Rhetorical Code Studies: Discovering Arguments in and around Code. U of Michigan P, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, Colin Gifford. Lingua Fracta: Toward a Rhetoric of New Media. Hampton P, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gregory T. Programming Beyond Practices: Be More Than Just a Code Monkey. O’Reilly, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, James J., Jr. Ethical Programs: Hospitality and the Rhetorics of Software. U of Michigan P, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• —. “The Machine That Therefore I Am,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 47, no. 4, 2014, pp. 494–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, Susan. Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History. U of Pittsburgh P, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Emily. Brotopia: Breaking Up the Boys’ Club of Silicon Valley. Penguin Random House, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, Karma R. “The Body: An Abstract and Actual Rhetorical Concept.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 242–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. MIT P, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Criado Perez, Caroline. Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. Abrams P, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, Ellen. The Cherokee Syllabary: Writing the People’s Perseverance. U of Oklahoma P, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ensmenger, Nathan L. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. MIT P, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fancher, Patricia. “Embodying Turing’s Machine: Queer, Embodied Rhetorics in the History of Digital Computation.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 37, no. 1, 2018, pp. 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, Lisa A. “Between Abundance and Marginalization. The Imperative of Racial Rhetorical Criticism,” Review of Communication, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, pp. 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, Alexander R. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization, MIT P, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gouge, Catherine and John Jones. “Wearable Rhetorics: Bodies, Cities, Collectives.” Special issue of Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 46, no.3, 2016, pp. 199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics, U Press of Colorado, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, Jack. The Queer Art of Failure. Duke UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit, Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford UP, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, Claudia. Sexing Code: Subversion, Theory and Representation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. Hicks, Marie. Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost its Edge in Computing. MIT P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Krista. “Designing for Human-Machine Collaboration: Smart Hearing Aids as Wearable Technologies,” Communication Design Quarterly Review, vol. 5, no. 4, 2018, pp. 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kesteloot, Lawrence. “Introduction to Programming.” Team Ten. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Mateas, Michael and Nick Montfort. “A Box, Darkly: Obfuscation, Weird Languages, and Code Aesthetics.” Proceedings of the 6th Annual Digital Arts and Culture Conference, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, Lisa, editor. Rhetorical Accessability: At the Intersections of Technical Communication and Disability Studies, Baywood P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, Nick, et al. 10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)): GOTO10. MIT P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Urban. “Brainfuck, or how I learned to change the problem.” Tamedia TX, 13 June 2017, Tamedia AG, Zürich. Conference presentation.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Lisa. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. U of Minnesota P, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, Thomas K. and Robert L. Krizek. “Whiteness: A Strategic Rhetoric,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 81, no. 3, 1995, pp. 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU P, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Jenny Edbauer. “Rhetoric’s Mechanics: Retooling the Equipment of Writing Production,” College Composition and Communication, vol. 60, no. 2, 2008, pp. 366–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Julietta. Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements. Duke UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Smitherman, Geneva. Talkin that Talk: Language, Culture, and Education in African America, Routledge, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vee, Annette. Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming is Changing Writing, MIT P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Vee, Annette and James J. Brown, Jr., eds. “Rhetoric and Computation.” Special Issue of Computational Culture, vol. 5, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter-Boettcher, Sara. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech, W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Weheliye, Alexander G. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W.H. Freeman, 1976.
   Google Scholar