492
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Algorithmic Abstraction and the Racial Neoliberal Rhetorics of 23andMe

, &

Works cited

  • Ahmed, Sara. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life, Duke, 2012.
  • Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, New P, 2010.
  • “Ancestry Composition.” 23andMe. Accessed 10 May. 2020. Web.
  • Anderson, Carol. White Rage: The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide, Bloomsbury, 2016.
  • Au, Wayne. “Meritocracy 2.0: High-Stakes, Standardized Testing as a Racial Project of Neoliberal Multiculturalism.” Educational Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016, pp. 39–62.
  • Bahra, R A. ““You Can Only Be Happy if You’re Thin!” Normalcy, Happiness, and the Lacking Body.” Fat Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, 2018, pp. 193–202.
  • Baldwin, Andrew. “Premediation and White Affect: Climate Change and Migration in Critical Perspective.” Transactions, vol. 41, 2016, pp. 78–90.
  • Beck, Brenden, and Adam Goldstein. “Governing through Police? Housing Market Reliance, Welfare Retrenchment, and Police Budgeting in an Era of Declining Crime.” Social Forces, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1183–210.
  • Beck, Estee. “A Theory of Persuasive Computer Algorithms for Rhetorical Code Studies.” Enculturation, vol. 23, 2016. Accessed 29 May. 2020. Web. .
  • Bishop, Alan J. “Western Mathematics: The Secret Weapon of Cultural Imperialism.” Race and Class, vol. 32, no. 2, 1990, pp. 51–65.
  • Braedley, Susan. “The Masculinization Effect: Neoliberalism, the Medical Paradigm and Ontario’s Health Care Policy.” Canadian Women’s Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, 2012, pp. 71–83.
  • Brock, Kevin. “Enthymeme as Rhetorical Algorithm.” Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014. Accessed 29 May 2020. Web.
  • Brock, Kevin, and Dawn Shepherd. “Understanding How Algorithms Work Persuasively through the Procedural Enthymeme.” Computers and Composition, vol. 42, 2016, pp. 17–27.
  • Burton, Leone. “Moving toward a Feminist Epistemology of Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 28, 1995, pp. 275–91.
  • Chaput, Catherine. Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debate, U of South Carolina P, 2019.
  • Chávez, Karma R. “The Body: An Abstract and Actual Rhetorical Concept.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 242–50.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, Routledge, 1990.
  • The Combahee River Collective Statement: Black Feminist Organizing in the Seventies and Eighties. Kitchen Table, 1986.
  • Davis, Patricia G. “Reversal of Injury in the Obama Era: Shelby County Vs. Holder, Ressentiment, Moral Authority, and the Discursive Construction of White Victimhood.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 36, no. 4, 2017, pp. 320–31.
  • Dawson, Michael C., and Megan Ming Francis. “Black Politics and the Neoliberal Racial Order.” Public Culture, vol. 28, no. 1, 2015, pp. 23–62.
  • De Hertogh, Lori Beth, et al. “Feminist Leanings:” Tracing Technofeminist and Intersectional Practices and Values.” Three Decades of Computers and Composition.” Computers and Composition, vol. 51, 2019, pp. 4–13.
  • Dingo, Rebecca. Networking Arguments: Rhetoric, Transnational Feminism, and Public Policy Writing, U of Pittsburgh P, 2012.
  • ———.“Turning the Tables on the Megarhetoric of Women’s Empowerment.” The Megarhetorics of Global Development, Rebecca Dingo and J. Blake Scott, edited by, U of Pittsburgh P, 2012, pp. 174–98.
  • Dingo, Rebecca, and J. Blake Scott editors. The Megarhetorics of Global Development, U of Pittsburgh P, 2012.
  • Dirth, Thomas P., and Glenn A. Adams. “Decolonial Theory and Disability Studies: On the Modernity/Coloniality of Ability.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, pp. 260–89.
  • “DNA Reports List.” 23andMe. Accessed 1 Jul. 2020. Web.
  • Dolmage, Jay Timothy. Disability Rhetoric, Syracuse UP, 2014.
  • Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality: How High Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, Macmillan, 2019.
  • Fancher, Patricia. “Embodying Turing’s Machine: Queer, Embodied Rhetorics in the History of Digital Computation.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 37, no. 1, 2018, pp. 90–104.
  • Fitzgerald, Kathleen J. “The Continuing Significance of Race: Racial Genomic in a Postracial Era.” Humanity and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, 2014, pp. 49–66.
  • Fujimura, Joan H, and Ramya Rajagopalan. “Different Differences: The Use of ‘Genetic Ancestry’ versus Race in Biomedical Human Genetic Research.” Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 1, 2011, pp. 5–30.
  • “Global Genetics Project.” 23andMeBlog, 8 Feb 2020. Accessed 29 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Goldberg, David Theo. “Racisms without Racism.” PMLA, vol. 123, no. 5, 2009, pp. 1712–16.
  • Green, Ronald Walter, and Kevin Douglas Kuswa. “‘From the Arab Spring to Athens, from Occupy Wall Street to Moscow’: Regional Accents and the Rhetorical Cartography of Power.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, 2012, pp. 271–88.
  • Gruwell, Leigh. “Constructing Research, Constructing the Platform: Algorithms and the Rhetoricity of Social Media Research.” Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018. Accessed 20 May. 2020. Web.
  • Grzanka, Patrick R., and Justin Maher. “Different, like Everyone Else: Stuff White People like and the Marketplace of Diversity.” Symbolic Interaction, vol. 35, no. 3, 2012, pp. 363–98.
  • Hamilton, Darrick. “Neoliberalism and Race.” Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, no. 53, 2019. Accessed 30 May. 2020. Web.
  • Hocutt, Daniel. “Algorithms as Information Brokers: Visualizing Rhetorical Agency in Platform Activities.” Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018. Accessed 20 May. 2020. Web.
  • Ingraham, Chris. “Toward an Algorithmic Rhetoric.” Digital Rhetoric and Global Literacies: Communication Modes and Digital Practices in the Networked World, edited by Gustav Verhulsdonck, et al., 2014, pp. 62–79.
  • “The Inspiration for the Algorithmic Justice League.” Accessed 3 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Jabbar, Huriya, et al. “Gender, Markets, and Inequality: A Framework.” Educational Policy, vol. 32, no. 6, 2018, pp. 755–96.
  • Kennedy, Tammie M., et al. “The Matter of Whiteness: Or, Why Whiteness Studies Is Important to Rhetoric and Composition Studies.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 24, no. 4, 2005, pp. 359–73.
  • Lazzarato, Maurizzio. Governing by Debt, Semiotext(e, 2013.
  • Martinez, Elizabeth. “What Is White Supremacy?” 1998. Accessed 30 May 2020. Web.
  • Matias, Cheryl E, et al. “Blocking CRT: How the Emotionality of Whiteness Blocks CRT in Urban Teacher Education.” Educational Studies, vol. 52, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–19.
  • Meliani, Leila. “Machine Learning at PredPol: Risks, Biases, and Opportunities for Predictive Policing.” 13 Nov. 2018. Accessed 2 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Merz, Sibille. “‘Health and Ancestry Start Here’: Race and Prosumption in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Services.” Ephemera, vol. 16, no. 3, 2016, pp. 119–40.
  • Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York UP, 2018.
  • O’Neal, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Crown, 2016.
  • Peck, Jamie. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford, 2010.
  • Pezzullo, Phaedra. Toxic Tourism: Rhetorics of Pollution, Travel, and Environmental Justice, U of Alabama, 2009.
  • “Predictive Policing Technology,” PredPol. Accessed 2 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • “Predictive Policing: Guidance on Where and When to Patrol,” PredPol. Accessed 2 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Reyes, G. Mitchell. “Stranger Relations: The Case for Rebuilding Commonplaces between Rhetoric and Mathematics.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 5, 2014, pp. 470–91.
  • Reyman, Jessica. “The Rhetorical Agency of Algorithms.” Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, edited by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, Routledge, 2017, pp. 112–25.
  • Rhee, Jeong-eun. “The Neoliberal Racial Project: The Tiger Mother and Governmentality.” Educational Theory, vol. 63, no. 6, 2013, pp. 561–80.
  • Riedner, Rachel, and Kevin Mahoney. Democracies to Come: Rhetorical Action, Neoliberalism, and Communities of Resistance, Lexington, 2008.
  • Roberts, Dorothy. “Complicating the Triangle of Race, Class, and State: The Insights of Black Feminists.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no. 10, 2014, pp. 1776–82.
  • ———.“Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century.” New P, 2011.
  • “Roots.” 23andMe. Accessed 30 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Rotman, Brian. Ad Infinitum: The Ghost in Turing’s Machine: Taking God Out of Mathematics and Putting the Body Back In. An Essay in Corporeal Semiotics, Stanford UP, 1993.
  • ———.“Mathematics As Sign: Writing, Imagining, Counting.” Stanford UP, 2000.
  • Ruckenstein, Minna. “Keeping Data Alive: Talking DTC Genetic Testing.” Information, Communication, and Society, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1024–39.
  • Schlauderaff, Sav. “Re-Imagining Futurity for Fat, Disabled and ‘Unhealthy’ Bodyminds: A Response to 23andMe’s Health + Ancestry Genetic Testing Kits.” Fat Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society, 2019, Accessed 30 May 2020. Web.
  • Scodari, Christine. “When Markers Meet Marketing: Ethnicity, Race, Hybridity, and Kinship in Genetic Genealogy Television Advertising.” Genealogy, vol. 1, no. 4, 2017.
  • Spurr, David. The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration, Duke UP, 1993.
  • Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership, U of North Carolina P, 2019.
  • “Understanding Abstraction.” 101 Computing.net, 10 Dec. 2015. Accessed 2 Jun. 2020. Web.
  • Washington, Harriet A. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present, Anchor, 2006.
  • West, Thomas R. “White Power, White Fear.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 24, no. 4, 2005, pp. 385–88.
  • Wilson, Noah. “Algorithmic Dwelling: Ethos as Deformance in Online Spaces.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 39, no. 2, 2020, pp. 216–29.
  • Wojcicki, Anne. “Black Lives Matter.” 23andMe, 2 Jun. 2020. Accessed 1 Jul. 2020. Web.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.