Creationist Science and the Rhetorical Capacity of the Scientific Method

Works Cited

• “About Answers in Genesis.” Answers in Genesis. Accessed 29 Apr. 2020. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Arp, Halton C. Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies. Cambridge UP, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• —— — Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science. C. Roy Keys Incorporated, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Jason M. “Adaptive Speciation: The Role of Natural Selection in Mechanisms of Geographic and Non-Geographic Speciation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, June 2005, pp. 303–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceccarelli, Leah. “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs, vol. 14, no. 2, 2011, pp. 195–228.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. Rethinking Expertise. U of Chicago P, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. “Disabled upon Arrival: The Rhetorical Construction of Disability and Race at Ellis Island.” Cultural Critique, vol. 77, 2011, pp. 24–69.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Danny R. “The Case for Cosmological Redshifts.” Answers Research Journal, vol. 11, 2018, pp. 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 6, 1983, pp. 781–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. Scott, and Lynda Walsh. “There’s No Such Thing as a Scientific Controversy.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, July 2019, pp. 192–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, K. (n.d.). “Whose Bow Is It?” Answers in Genesis. Accessed 7 Dec. 2019. Web
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, Bodie. (n.d). “How Old Is the Earth?” Answers in Genesis, Accessed 29 Apr. 2020. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, Elizabeth. “What Are Redshift and Blueshift?” Space. Accessed 16 March 2018. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, Susan C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Southern Illinois UP, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanson, Nathaniel T. “Mitochondrial DNA Clocks Imply Linear Speciation Rates Within ‘Kinds.’” Answers Research Journal, vol. 8, 2015, pp. 273–304.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanson, Nathaniel T. “What Happened to the Animals after Noah’s Ark?” Answers In Genesis. Accessed 16 July 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, Lauren R. “Harms of Hedging in Scientific Discourse: Andrew Wakefield and the Origins of the Autism Vaccine Controversy.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 3, July 2014, pp. 165–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lessl, Thomas M. Rhetorical Darwinism: Religion, Evolution, and the Scientific Identity. Baylor UP, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Dyani. “COVID-19 Rarely Spreads through Surfaces. So Why Are We Still Deep Cleaning?” Nature, vol. 590, no. 7844, Feb. 2021, pp. 26–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matt, Georg E., and Marisa Sklar. Generalizability Theory. Elsevier, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn R. “Kairos in the Rhetoric of Science.” A Rhetoric of Doing: Essays on Written Discourse in Honor of James L. Kinneavy, Southern Illinois UP, 1992, pp. 310–27.
   Google Scholar
• —— — “The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis.” Configurations, vol. 11, no. 2, Johns Hopkins UP, 2003, pp. 163–202.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn R., and Molly Hartzog. “‘Tree Thinking’: The Rhetoric of Tree Diagrams in Biological Thought.” Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis & Invention, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020. Web.
   Google Scholar
• Numbers, Ronald L. “Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, vol. 33, no. 1, 2011, pp. 129–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul, Danette, et al. “Moving beyond the Moment: Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 15, no. 3, July 2001, pp. 372–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Redd, Nola Taylor. “How Old Is Earth?” Space. Accessed 7 Feb. 2019. Web
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, Carol. “Of Frogs & Rhetoric: The Atrazine Wars.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, Oct. 2015, pp. 328–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, Jenny. Awful Archives: Conspiracy Theory, Rhetoric, and Acts of Evidence. The Ohio SUP, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Ellen. Fantasies of Identification: Disability, Gender, Race. New York UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Carolyn. Women Physicians and Professional Ethos in Nineteenth-Century America. Southern Illinois UP, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Snelling, Andrew A. “About Answers Research Journal.” Answers in Genesis. Accessed 29 Apr. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles Alan. Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation. U of Wisconsin P, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Vox, Lisa. Existential Threats: American Apocalyptic Beliefs in the Technological Era.U of Pennsylvania P, 2017.
   Google Scholar