Shaftesbury's Soliloquy: The development of rhetorical authority

Works cited

• Axelrod , Rise B. and Cooper , Charles R. 1985 . The St. Martin's Guide to Writing , New York : St Martin's .
   Google Scholar
• Baker , Sheridan . 1981 . The Practical Stylist. , 5th ed. , New York : Harper and Row .
   Google Scholar
• Berlin , James A. 1982 . “Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories” . College English , 44 : 765 – 77 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• _____ . 1987 . Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900–1985 , Carbondale : Southern Illinois UP .
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell , Patricia . 1989 . ‘"Cultural Criticism’: A Social Approach to Studying Writing” 1988 CCCC Research Network Symposium: What Are We Doing as a Research Community? . Rhetoric Review , 7 : 224 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Brinton , Alan . 1983 . “Quintilian, Plato, and the Vir Bonus” . Philosophy and Rhetoric , 16 : 167 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke , Kenneth . 1955 . A Rhetoric of Motives , New York : George Brazillier .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper , Anthony Ashley . 1963 . Soliloquy, or Advice to an Author. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, etc , Edited by: Robertson , John M. 2 vols. , 101 – 34 . Gloucester, Mass. : Peter Smith . 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury. 1
   Google Scholar
• _____ . The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody . Characteristics , 2 1 – 153 .
   Google Scholar
• _____ . Sensus Communis; An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humor . Characteristics , 1 43 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Confer , Jim W. 1989 . “Hunting for Ethos Where They Say It Can't Be Found” . Rhetoric Review , 7 : 299 – 316 .
   Google Scholar
• Cowan , Gregory and Elizabeth . 1980 . Writing , Scott Foresman . N.p.:
   Google Scholar
• Diderot , Denis . 1771 . “De La Poésie Dramatique” Afterword ” . In La Pere de Famille. Oeuvres de Theatre avec un discours sur la Poisie Dramatique 2 vols. , 263 – 438 . Amsterdam 2
   Google Scholar
• Duke , Charles R. 1983 . Writing Through Sequence: a Process Approach , Boston : Little Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Ede , Lisa and Lunsford , Andrea . 1984 . “Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy” . College Composition and Communication , 35 : 155 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow , Peter . 1987 . “Closing My Eyes As I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience” . College English , 49 : 50 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• _____ . 1981 . Writing With Power , New York : Oxford UP .
   Google Scholar
• Fromm , Erich . 1959 . “The Creative Attitude” . In Creativity and Its Cultivation , Edited by: Anderson , Harold H. 44 – 54 . New York : Harper .
   Google Scholar
• Herum , John and Cummings , D. W. 1971 . Writing: Plans, Drafts and Revisions , New York : Random .
   Google Scholar
• Isocrates . 1966 . Isocrates , Edited by: Norlin , George . Cambridge, MA : Harvard UP . London: William Heinemann,
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , Robert Harrison . 1965 . Four Dialectical Theories of Poetry: An Aspect of English Neoclassical Criticism , Chicago : U of Chicago P .
   Google Scholar
• Murray , Donald M. 1982 . “Teaching the Other Self: The Writer's First Reader” . College Composition and Communication , 33 : 140 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman , Chaim and Olbrechts‐Tyteca , L. 1969 . The New Rhetoric , Notre Dame : Notre Dame UP .
   Google Scholar
• Rohman , D. Gordon and Wlecke , Albert O. 1964 . PreWriting: The Construction and Application of Models for Concept Formation in Writing , East Lansing, MI : Michigan State UP .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , Mike . 1980 . “Rigid Rules, Inflexible Plans, and the Stifling of Language: A Cognitivist Analysis of Writer's Block” . College Composition and Communication , 31 : 389 – 400 .
   Google Scholar
• Roth , Robert G. 1987 . “The Evolving Audience: Alternatives to Audience Accommodation” . College Composition and Communication , 38 : 47 – 55 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart , Donald C. 1988 . “Collaborative Learning and Composition: Boon or Bane?” . Rhetoric Review , 7 : 58 – 83 .
   Google Scholar