An Elegant Mess: Reflections on the Research of Edward Z. Tronick

REFERENCES

• Adler, E., & J. Bachant. (1996), Free association and analytic neutrality: The basic structure of the analytic situation. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 1021–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996), A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1968), The Basic Fault. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1960), What is Sport?, trans. R. Howard. New Haven, CT: Yale University, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, S. (1954), Waiting for Godot: A Tragicomedy in Two Acts. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., & F. Lachmann. (1994), Representation and internalization in infancy: Three principles of salience. Psychoanal. Psychol., 11: 127–165.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1988), The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1977), Two Papers: The Grid and Caesura. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Imago.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, R., & J. Steiner. (1994), Interpretation: Selected fact and overvalued idea. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 75: 1069–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1998), Standing in the Spaces. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990), Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri, J. (2006), Psychoanalysis: From Practice to Theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N., & S. Contratto. (1982), The fantasy of the perfect mother. In: Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. B. Thorne. New York: Longman, pp. 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (1996), Facts all come with a point of view. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 77: 255–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2000a), Objects of Hope: Exploring Possibility and Limit in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2000b), Mutual containment in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Dial., 10: 166–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2008), Privacy, reverie, and the analyst’s ethical imagination. Psychoanal. Quart., 77: 1045–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2010), A Disturbance in the Field: Essays on Transference-Countertransference. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. (2014), The things we carry: Dedicated attention to internal objects and the analyst’s participation. Psychoanal Dial., 24: 621–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., & D. Levit. (1998), Old and new objects in Fairbairn and American relational theory. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 603–624.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2006), The failure of practice to inform theory and the role of implicit theory in bridging the transmission gap. In: Psychoanalysis: From Practice to Theory, ed. J. Canestri. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., & M. Target. (1998), Mentalization and the changing aims of child psycho-analysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Fosha, D. (2000), The Transforming Power of Affect. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, W. (1994), Societies of Brains. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1915), Letter to Ferenczi, August 1915. In: The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi, Volume 2, 1914–1919. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. (2004), The relational unconscious: A core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. Psychoanal. Quart., 73: 63–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (2009), Angels and Ages: A Short Book about Darwin, Lincoln, and Modern Life. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. M. (2003), Change in psychoanalysis: Getting from A to B. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51: 221–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1983), The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp.Psychoanal., 19: 389–422.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1996), The intimate and ironic authority of the analyst. Psychoanal. Quart., 65: 102–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999), The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization., 19: 576–617.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K., N. Bruschweiler-Stern, A. M. Harrison, J. P. Nahum, L. Sander, D. N. Stern, & E. Z. Tronick. (1998), Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Ment. Health J., 19: 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K., N. Bruschweiler-Stern, A. M. Harrison, J. P. Nahum, L. Sander, D. N. Stern, & E. Z. Tronick (2011), The self as a dynamical system. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psych. and Life Sci., 5: 311–345.
   Google Scholar
• Marks-Tarlow, T. (2009), Nonlinear science in the art of psychoanalysis. Psychologist Psychoanal., 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964), The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1991), Wishes, needs, and interpersonal negotiations. Psychoanal. Inq., 11: 147– 170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1997), Influence and Autonomy. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, A. (1968), Object Love and Reality. New York: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994), The analytic third. Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 75: 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1970), Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rilke, R. (1922), Uncollected poems. In: Ahead of All Parting: The Selected Poetry and Prose of Rainer Maria Rilke, ed. S. Mitchell. New York: Modern Library, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. (2006), Emotional growth and crises of attachment. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 76: 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2005), Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 15: 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (1990), Cues: The perceptual edge of the transference. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 71: 219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2000), Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic object relationship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48: 95–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985), The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1992), Commentary on constructivism in clinical psychoanalysis. Contemp. Psychoanal., 28: 331–363.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (1961), The Psychoanalytic Situation: An Examination of Its Development and Basic Structure. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Symington, N. (1983), The analyst’s act of freedom as agent of therapeutic change. Int. R. Psycho-Anal., 10: 283–291.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2002a), Making and breaking human connections: Dyadic expansion of consciousness and moving away from entropy. Presented at Symposium on Affective Interaction: A Tool for Social and Cognitive Development. International Congress on Infant Studies. Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2002b), Relational models need to grow up and understand the change in meaning systems from infancy to adulthood. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (2003), “Of course all relationships are unique”: How co-creative processes generate unique mother–infant and patient–therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanal. Inq., 23: 473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M. K., & E. Tronick. (1994), Beyond the face: An empirical study of infant affective configurations of facial, vocal, gestural, and regulatory behaviors. Child Dev., 65: 1503–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. (1961), The capacity to be alone. In: The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: International Universities Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar