Publication Cover
Psychoanalytic Inquiry
A Topical Journal for Mental Health Professionals
Volume 35, 2015 - Issue 6: Postmodernism and Psychoanalysis
1,204
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Psychoanalysis in Postmodern Times: Some Questions and Challenges

REFERENCES

  • Ablon, J. S., & E. E. Jones. (1998), How expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive–behavioral therapy. Psychother. Res., 8: 71–83.
  • Bauman, Z. (1990), Liquid Modernity. Cambridge UK: Polity.
  • Bell, D. (2009), Is truth an illusion? Psychoanalysis and postmodernism. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 90: 331–345.
  • Bernardi, R. (1989), The role of paradigmatic determinants in psychoanalytic understanding. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 70: 341–357.
  • Blass, R. (2006), Introduction. American Imago. 63(3): 253–260.
  • Bleger, J. (1973), Criterios de curación y objetivos del psicoanálisis. [Criteria of the cure and objectives of psychoanalysis] Revista de Psicoanálisis APA, 30(2): 317–342.
  • Bohleber, W., P. Fonagy, J. P. Jiménez, D. Scarfone, S. Varvin, & S. Zysman. (2013), Towards a better use of psychoanalytic concepts. A model illustrated using the concept of enactment. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 94: 501–530.
  • Brenner, C. (1982), The Mind in Conflict. New York: International University Press.
  • Bromberg, P. (2006), Awakening the Dreamer. Clinical Journeys. Mahwah, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bromberg, P.. (2008a), Shrinking the tsunami. Affect regulation, dissociation and the shadow of the flood. Contemp. Psychoanal., 44(3): 329–350.
  • Bromberg, P.. (2008b), “Grown-up” words: An interpersonal/relational perspective on unconscious fantasy. Psychoanal. Inq., 28(2): 131–150.
  • Bruzzone, M., E. Casaula, J. P. Jiménez, & J. F. Jordán. (1985), Regression and persecution in analytic training. Reflections on experience. Internat. Rev. Psycho-Anal., 12: 411–415.
  • Canestri, J. (1994), Transformations. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 75: 1079–1092.
  • Canestri, J.. (2006), Psychoanalysis From Practice to Theory. West Sussex England: Wiley.
  • Canestri, J.. (2012), Putting Theory to Work. How are Theories Actually Used in Practice? London: Karnac.
  • Cavell, M. (1993), The Psychoanalytic Mind: From Freud to Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cavell, M.. (1998) Triangulation, one’s own mind and objectivity. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 79: 449–467.
  • Coburn, W. J. (2009), Attitudes in psychoanalytic complexity. An alternative to postmodernism in psychoanalysis. In: Beyond Postmodernism, ed. R. Frie & D. Orange. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 183–200.
  • Dreher, U. (2000), Foundation for Conceptual Research in Psychoanalysis [Psychoanalytic Monograph]. London: Karnac.
  • Fonagy, P. (2002), An Open Door Review of Outcome Studies in Psychoanalysis. Report Prepared by the Research Committee of the IPA. Second Revised Edition. London: International Psychoanalytic Association.
  • Fonagy, P.. (2006), The failure of practice to inform theory and the role of implicit theory in bridging the transmission gap. In: Psychoanalysis From Practice to Theory, ed. J. Canestri. West Sussex: Wiley, pp. 69–86.
  • Fonagy, P., & M. Target. (2003), Psychoanalytic Theories: Perspectives From Developmental Psychopathology. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Freud, S. (1923), Two encyclopaedia articles. Standard Edition 18: 223–260. London: Hogarth Press.
  • Freud, S.. (1927), Postscript to the question of lay analysis. Standard Edition 20: 251–258. London: Hogarth Press, 1957.
  • Frie, R. (2009), Introduction. Coherence or fragmentation? Modernism, postmodernism, and the search for continuity. In: Beyond Postmodernism. New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, ed. R. Frie & D. Orange. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–23.
  • Frie, R.. (2009), Preface. In: Beyond Postmodernism. New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, ed. R. Frie & D. Orange. New York: Routledge, pp. ix–xi.
  • Gabbard, G. O., & D. Westen. (2003), Rethinking therapeutic action. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 84: 823–841.
  • Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Goldfried, M. R., P. J. Raue, & L. G. Castonguay. (1998), The therapeutic focus in significant sessions of master therapists: A comparison of cognitive–behavioral and psychodynamic–interpersonal interventions. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 66: 803–810.
  • Green, A. (2005), The illusion of common ground and mythical pluralism. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 86: 627–635.
  • Gunderson, J. G., & G. O. Gabbard. (1999), Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 47(3): 679–704.
  • Hamilton, V. (1996), The Analyst’s Preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • IPA Board. (2009), Project Group on Conceptual Integration—Mandate. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Israël, P. (1999), Introduction to the Report of the Committee on Psychoanalysis and Allied Therapies. Internat. Psychoanal., 8(1): 14–18.
  • Jiménez, J. P. (1999), (Widening) lines of advance in psychoanalytic therapy. Internat. Psychoanal., 8(1): 19–20.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2003), De la amenaza a la oportunidad [From threat to opportunity]. Internat. Psychoanal., 12(1): 26–27.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2005), The search for integration or how to work as a pluralist psychoanalyst. Psychoanal. Inq., 25: 602–634.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2006), After pluralism: A new integrated psychoanalytic paradigm. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 87: 1487–1507.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2007), Can research influence clinical practice? Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 88: 661–679.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2008), Theoretical plurality and pluralism in psychoanalytic practice. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 89: 579–599.
  • Jiménez, J. P.. (2009), Grasping psychoanalysts’ practice in its own merits. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 90: 231–248.
  • Jones, E. E., & S. M. Pullos. (1993), Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive–behavioral therapies. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 61: 306–316.
  • Jurist, E. (2010), Elliot Jurist interviews Peter Fonagy. Psychoanal. Psych., 27(1): 2–7.
  • Kernberg, O. (2012), Suicide prevention for psychoanalytic institutes and societies. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 60(4): 707–719.
  • Kvale, S. (1995), The social construction of validity. Qualit. Inq., 1(1): 19–40.
  • Leffert, M. (2008), Complexity and postmodernism in contemporary theory of psychoanalytic change. J. Acad. Psychoanal. Dynamic Psych., 36(3): 517–542.
  • Lyotard, J. (1979), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
  • Makari, G. (2008), Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis. New York: Harper Collins.
  • Orlinsky, D. E., & M. H. Ronnestad. (2005), How Psychotherapists Develop. A Study of Therapeutic Work and Professional Growth. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Process of Change Study Group. (1998), Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy. The ‘something more’ than interpretation. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 79: 903–921.
  • Pulver, S. E. (1987a), How theory shapes technique: Perspectives on a clinical study. Prologue. Psychoanal. Inq., 7: 141–145.
  • Pulver, S. E.. (1987b), How theory shapes technique: perspectives on a clinical study. Epilogue. Psychoanal. Inq., 7: 289–299.
  • Renik, O. (2006), Practical Psychoanalysis for Therapists and Patients. New York: Other Press.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1977), The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25: 835–871.
  • Rorty, R. (2000), Pragmatism. Internat. J. Psycho–Anal., 81: 819–823.
  • Safran, J. D. (2003), The relational turn, the therapeutic alliance, and psychotherapy research: Strange bedfellows or postmodern marriage? Contemp. Psychoanal., 39: 449–475.
  • Sandler, J. (1983), Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Internat. J. Psycho–Anal., 64: 35–45.
  • Sandler, J., & A. U. Dreher. (1996), What Do Psychoanalysts Want? The Problem of Aims in Psychoanalytic Therapy. London: Routledge.
  • Segal, H. (2006), Reflections on truth, tradition, and the psychoanalytic tradition of truth. Amer. Imago, 64(3): 283–292.
  • Seitz, P. F. D. (1966), The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In: Method of Research in Psychotherapy, ed. L. A. Gottschalk & A. H. Auerbach. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209–225.
  • Spence, D. (1982), Narrative and Historical Truth. Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
  • Stern, D. N. (1985), The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Stern, D. N.. (2004), The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: Norton.
  • Strenger, C. (1991), Between Hermeneutic and Science. An Essay on the Epistemology of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International University Press.
  • Teicholz, J. G. (2009), A strange convergence. Postmodern theory, infant research, and psychoanalysis. In: Beyond Postmodernism. New Dimensions in Clinical Theory and Practice, ed. R. Frie & D Orange. London: Routledge, pp. 69–91.
  • Thomä, H., & H. Kächele. (1987), Psychoanalytic Practice. 1. Principles. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • Thomä, H., & H. Kächele. (2007), On the basis of a new form of treatment report. Psychoanal. Inq., 27(5): 650–685.
  • Wallerstein, R. (1988), One psychoanalysis or many? Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 69: 5–21.
  • Wallerstein, R.. (1990), Psychoanalysis: The common ground. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., 71: 3–20.
  • Wallerstein, R.. (1993), Psychoanalysis as science: Challenges to the data of psychoanalytic research. In: Psychodynamic Treatment Research, ed. N. E. Miller, L. Luborsky, J. P. Barber, & J. P. Docherty. New York: Basic Books, pp. 98–106.
  • Wampold, B. E. (2001), The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.