Maternal Ethics and the Therapeutic Work of Protecting Open Futures

References

• Addelson, K. P. (1993), Knowers/doers and their moral problems. In: Feminist Epistomologies, ed. Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter. New York: Routledge, pp. 265–294.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L., & K. Starr. (2013), Psychotherapy for the People. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baraitser, L. (2009), Maternal Encounters: The Ethics of Interruption. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1988), The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Botticelli, S. (2006), Globalization, psychoanalysis, and the provision of care: Roundtable on global woman. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 7(1): 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bueskens, (2014), Mothering and Psychoanalysis: Clinical, Sociological, and Feminist Perspectives, ed. Petra, Bueskens. Ontario, Canada: Demeter.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. (1999), The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and Sociology of Gender. Berkeley, CA: U. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corpt, E. (2011), The art and craft of psychoanalytic practice: A discussion of Orange’s “Speaking the unspeakable: ‘The implicit’, traumatic living memory, and the dialogue of metaphors.” Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psych., 6: 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Foehl, J.C. (2011), A phenomenology of distance: On being hard to reach. Psychoanal. Dial., 21: 607–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehl, J.C. (2014), A phenomenology of depth. Psychoanal. Dial., 24: 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1938), An outline of psychoanalysis. Standard Edition, 23: 139–208. London: Hogarth Press, 1953–74.
   Google Scholar
• Frie, R. (2000), Intersubjectivity and the philosophical tradition. J. Amer. Psychoanl. Assn., 48: 684–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frie, R. (2012), Psychoanalysis, religion, philosophy and the possibility of dialogue: Freud, Binswanger and Pfister. Internat. Forum Psychoanal., 21: 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S., & L. Baraitser. (2003), Thinking, recognition, and otherness. Psychoanal. Rev., 90: 771–789.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groddeck, G. (1923), The Book of the It, trans. V. Collins. London: Vision, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Harpham, G. G. (1999), Shadows of Ethics: Criticism and the Just Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, P. (2008), Ferenczi’s collaboration with Rank: On paradigm shift and the origins of complementarity in psychoanalysis. Amer. J. Psychoanal., 68(2): 128–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollway, J. (2006), The Capacity to Care: Gender and Ethical Subjectivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, J., & B. Featherstone. (1997), Mothering and Ambivalence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hristeva, G., & M. F. Poster. (2013), Georg Groddeck’s maternal turn: Its evolution and influence on early psychoanalysis. Am. J. Psychoanal., 73: 228–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Layton, L, (2004), Defensive autonomy in middle-class women. Ann. Psychoanal., 32: 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, L (2006), Racial identities, racial enactments, and normative unconscious processes. Psychoanal. Quart., 75: 237–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, L. (2009), Who’s responsible? Our mutual implication in each other’s suffering. Psychoanal. Dial., 19: 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1974), Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence, trans. A. Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T. (1961), I stand here ironing. In: Tell Me a Riddle. New York: Dell, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M. (1995), Emotional Understanding: Studies in Psychoanalytic Epistomology. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M. (2010), Thinking for Clinicians: Philosophical Resources for Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Humanistic Psychotherapies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orange, D. M. (2011), The Suffering Stranger: Hermeneutics for Everyday Clinical Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Phillipson, I. (1994), On the Shoulders of Women: The Feminization of Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. (1978), Republic (Platonis Politeia). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1.352d.
   Google Scholar
• Poster, M. F. (2009), Ferenczi and Groddeck: Simpatico: Roots of a paradigm shift in psychoanalysis. Am. J. Psychoanal., 69: 195–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringstrom, P. A. (2010), Commenting on Donna Orange’s recognition as: Intersubjective vulnerability in the psychoanalytic dialogue. Internat. J. Psychoanal. Self Psych., 5: 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Rozmarin, E. (2007), An other in psychoanalysis: Emmanuel Levinas’s critique of knowledge and analytic sense. Contemp. Psychoanal., 43: 327–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozmarin, M. (2012), Maternal silence. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 13: 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. (1989), Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rudnytsky, P. (2002), Reading Psychoanalysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 141–206.
   Google Scholar
• Shabad, P. (2006), To expose or to cover up: Human vulnerability in the shadow of death. Contemp. Psychoanal., 42: 413–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabad, P. (2010), The suffering of passion: Metamorphoses and the embrace of the stranger. Psychoanal. Dial., 20: 710–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, M. O., & D. Kriegman. (1998), Why the analyst needs to change: Toward a theory of conflict, negotiation, and mutual influence in the therapeutic process. Psychoanal. Dial., 8: 247–284.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, H. M. (1996), Holding and the evolving metaphor. Psychoanal. Rev., 83: 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (2014), Holding and Psychoanalysis: A Relational Perspective. East Sussex, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, H. M. (2001), Origins of the ethical attitude. J. Anal. Psychol., 46: 443–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar