174
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Job-related “high mobility” in times of economic crisis: Analysis from four European countries

, &

References

  • Ahn, N., De la Rica, S., & Ugidos, A. (1999). Willingness to move for work and unemployment duration in Spain. Economica, 66, 335–357.
  • Allemand, S., Ascher, F., & Lévy, J. (Eds.). (2004). Les sens du mouvement. Modernité et mobilités dans les sociétés urbaines contemporaines [The directions of movement. Modernity and mobility in contemporary urban societies]. Paris, France: Belin.
  • Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ascher, F. (2004). Les sens du mouvement: modernités et mobilités [The directions of movement. Modernity and mobility]. In S. Allemand, F. Ascher, & J. Lévy (Eds.), Les sens du mouvement. Modernité et mobilités dans les sociétés urbaines contemporaines [The directions of movement. Modernity and mobility in contemporary urban societies] (pp. 21–34). Paris, France: Belin.
  • Bacqué, M.-H., & Fol, S. (2007). L’inégalité face à la mobilité: Du constat à l’injonction [Inequality in mobility: from the statement to the injunction]. Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 33, 89–104.
  • Battu, H., Ma, A., & Phimister, E. (2008). Housing tenure, job mobility and unemployment in the UK. The Economic Journal, 118, 311–328.
  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Belton-Chevallier, L. (2009). Mobilités et lien social. Sphères privée et professionnelle à l’épreuve du quotidien [Mobility and social link: private and professional spheres under the test of time] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Paris-Est, Paris, France.
  • Bihr, A., & Pfefferkorn, R. (1999). Déchiffrer les inégalités [Decipher inequalities]. Paris, France: Syros.
  • Bihr, A., & Pfefferkorn, R. (2008). Le système des inégalités [The system of inequalities]. Paris, France: La Découverte.
  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London, England: Verso.
  • Bunel, M. (2009). Concilier travail et vie familiale: Que cachent les déclarations des hommes et des femmes? [Balancing work and family life: What lies behind men and women discourses?]. In A. Paihle & A. Solaz (Eds.), Entre famille et travail [Between family and work] (pp. 141–164). Paris, France: La documentation Française.
  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society: The information age. Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Church, A., Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7, 195–205.
  • Confédération Suisse. (1982). Loi fédérale sur l'assurance-chômage obligatoire et l'indemnité en cas d'insolvabilité [Federal law on the obligatory unemployment Insurance and on compensation in case of insolvency]. Retrieved from https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19820159/index.html
  • Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move. Mobility in the modern Western world. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Cuin, C.-H. (1999). Inégalité sociale [Social inequality]. In A. Akoun & P. Ansart (Eds.), Dictionnaire de sociologie [Dictionary of sociology] (pp. 17–32). Paris, France: Robert Seuil.
  • Deding, M., Filges, T., & Van Ommeren, J. (2009). Spatial mobility and commuting: The case of two-earner households. Journal of Regional Science, 49, 113–147.
  • Department for Transport. (2010). Transport trends: 2009 edition. London, England: Transport Statistics, Author.
  • Eliasson, K., Lindgren, U., & Westerlund, O. (2003). Geographical labour mobility: Migration or communting? Regional Studies, 37, 827–837.
  • Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
  • ESPON. (2014). Third ESPON 2013 Scientific Report. Progress on a European platform for applied territorial science. Luxemburg: Author.
  • Fieldhouse, E. (1999). Ethnic minority unemployment and spatial mismatch: The case of London. Urban Studies, 36, 1569–1596.
  • Fol, S. (2009). La mobilité des pauvres [The mobility of the poor]. Paris, France: Belin.
  • Gobillon, L., Selod, H., & Zenou, Y. (2007). The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies, 44, 2401–2427.
  • Green, A., Hogarth, T., & Shackleton, R. (1999). Longer distance commuting as a substitute for migration in Britain: A review of trends, issues and implications. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 49–67.
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Holmes, M. (2004). An equal distance? Individualisation, gender and intimacy in distance relationships. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 180–200.
  • Hubert, J.-P. (2009). Dans les grandes agglomérations, la mobilité quotidienne des habitants diminue, et elle augmente ailleurs [In big cities, the daily mobility of inhabitants is decreasing, as it is increasing elsewhere]. Paris, France: Insee Premiere.
  • Joly, I., Littlejohn, K., & Kaufmann, V. (2006). La croissance des budgets-temps de transport en question: Nouvelles approches [The increase in transport time budget in question: New approaches]. Paris, France: PREDIT.
  • Kain, J. (1968). Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 175–197.
  • Kaufmann, V. (2011). Rethinking the city—Motility and urban dynamics. London, England: Routledge.
  • Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as a capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 745–756.
  • Kenyon, S., Lyons, G., & Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 207–219.
  • Lévy, J. (2003). Capital spatial [Spatial capital]. In J. Lévy & M. Lussault (Eds.), Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés [Dictionary of geography and society spaces] (pp. 261–263). Paris, France: Belin.
  • Lévy, J. (2004). Les essences du mouvement [The essences of movement]. In S. Allemand, F. Ascher, & J. Lévy (Eds.), Les sens du mouvement. Modernité et mobilités dans les sociétés urbaines contemporaines [The directions of movement. Modernity and mobility in contemporary urban societies] (pp. 298–307). Paris, France: Belin.
  • Limmer, R. (2004). Job mobility and living arrangements. In W. Bonss, S. Kesselring, & G. Vogl (Eds.), Mobility and the cosmopolitan perspective. A workshop at the Munich Reflexive Modernization Research Centre (pp. 89–94). Munich, Germany: Universität der Bundeswehr München.
  • Lord, S., Negron-Poblete, P., & Torres, J. (2015). Mobilités et exclusions. Quelles relations? [Mobilities and exclusions. Which relationships?]. Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université Laval.
  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.
  • Lück, D., & Ruppenthal, S. (2010). Mobile living: Spread, appearances and characteristics. In B. Collet & N. Schneider (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe. Volume II. Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in cross-national perspective (pp. 37–68). Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
  • Lyons, G., & Chatterjee, K. (2008). A human perspective on the daily commute: Costs, benefits and trade-offs. Transport Reviews, 28(2), 181–198.
  • Marion, B., & Horner, M. W. (2007). A comparison of the socioeconomic and demographic profiles of “extreme” commuters in several U.S. metropolitan statistical areas. Transportation Research Record, 2013, 38–45.
  • Meil, G. (2008) Summary job mobility in Europe: Greater differnces among social groups than among countries. In N. Schneider & G. Meil (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe II. Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in cross-national comparison (pp. 305–318). Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
  • Mignot, D., & Rosales Montano, S. (2006). Vers un droit à la mobilité pour tous, inégalités, territoires et vie quotidienne [Toward a right to mobility for everyone, inequalities, territories and daily life]. Paris, France: La Documentation Française.
  • Mongin, O. (2011). Questions de mobilité (connexions, vitesses, accès et espaces publics) [Questions on mobility (connections, speeds, accesses and public spaces)]. In C. Gay, V. Kaufman, S. Landriève, & S. Vincent-Geslin (Eds.), Mobile, immobile, choices and rights for 2030 (pp. 86–96). La Tour d’Aigues, France: Editions de l’aube.
  • Ng, T., Sorensen, K., Eby, L., & Feldman, D. (2007). Determinants of job mobility: A theoretical integration and extension. The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 363–386.
  • Nicolas, J.-P., Verry, D., & Longuar, Z. (2012). Evolutions récentes des emissions de CO2 liées à la mobilité des Français: Analyser les dynamiques à l’oeuvre grâce aux enquêtes-nationales Transports de 1994 à 2008 [Recent changes in CO2 emissions linked with mobility of French people: Assessing the dynamics at play thanks to the Transport National Surveys from 1994 to 2008]. Economie et Statistiques, 457–458, 161–183.
  • OECD, European Union, UNESCO-UIS. (2015). ISCED 2011. Operational manual guidelines for classifying national education programmes and related qualifications. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264228368-en
  • Office Fédéral de la Statistique. (2012). Feuille d’information «pendularite 2010» [Information sheet “commuting in 2010”]. Bern, Switzerland: Author.
  • Ohnmacht, T., Maksim, H., & Bergman, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mobilities and inequality. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
  • Orfeuil, J.-P. (2010). La mobilité, nouvelle question sociale? [The mobility, a new social question ?]. SociologieS. Retrieved from https://sociologies.revues.org/3321
  • Piron, M., Dureau, F., & Mullon, C. (2004). Utilisation de typologies multi-dates pour l’analyse des transformations socio-spatiales de Bogota (Colombie) [Using multi-date typologies to assess socio-spatial transformations in Bogota]. Cybergéo: European Journal of Geography, Space, Society, Territory. Retrieved from https://cybergeo.revues.org/3742
  • Pochet, P., & Routhier, J.-L. (2002). Mobilité résidentielle et allongement des distances domicile-travail dans la région urbaine de Lyon [Residential mobility and increasing in home-work travels in the urban region of Lyon]. In J.-P. Lévy & F. Dureau (Eds.), L’accès à la Ville: Les mobilités spatiales en questions [Access to the City: Space mobility in issues] (pp. 167–181). Paris, France: Editions de l’Harmattan.
  • Rosa, H. (2010). Accélération: Une critique sociale du temps [Acceleration: a social critic of time]. Paris, France: La Découverte.
  • Sandow, E. (2011). On the road. Social aspects of commuting long distances to work (Unpublished doctoral disseration). Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
  • Schneider, N., & Collet, B. (Eds.). (2010). Mobile living across Europe II. Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in cross-national comparison. Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
  • Schneider, N., & Meil, G. (Eds.). (2008). Mobile living across Europe I, relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.
  • Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110, 339–366.
  • Urry, J. (2007). Social inequalities in network capital. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 33, 9–26.
  • Van den Berg, G. J., & Gorter, C. (1997). Job search and commuting time. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 15, 269–281.
  • Van Ham, M., Mulder, C., & Hooimeijer, P. (2001). Spatial flexibility in job mobility: Macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions. Environment and Planning A, 33, 921–940.
  • Van Houtum, H., & Van der Velde, M. (2004). The power of cross-border labour and market immobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografi, 95, 100–107.
  • Van Ommeren, J. N., & Van der Straaten, W. (2008). The effects of search imperfections on commuting behavior: Evidence from employed and self-employed workers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(2), 27–147.
  • van Wee, B., Rietveld, P., & Meurs, H. (2006). Is average daily travel time expenditure constant? In search of explanations for an increase in average travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(2), 109–122.
  • Vignal, C. (2005). Injonctions à la mobilité, arbitrages résidentiels et délocalisation de l’emploi [Injunctions to mobility, residential arbitrages and job relocation]. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, 118, 101–117.
  • Vincent-Geslin, S., & Joly, I. (2012). Raisons et pratiques de la pendularité intensive. Le temps de trajet, entre temps subi et temps choisi [Reasons and behaviors of intensive commuting. Travel time, between sustained and chosen time]. Cahiers scientifiques des transports, 61, 159–186.
  • Vincent-Geslin, S., & Kaufmann, V. (Eds.). (2012). Mobilité sans racine. Plus loin, plus vite … plus mobiles? [Rootless mobility. Further, faster... more mobile?]. Paris, France: Editions Descartes & Cie.
  • Vincent-Geslin, S., & Ravalet, E. (2015) Socialisation to high mobility? In G. Viry & V. Kaufmann (Eds.), High mobility in Europe, work and personal life (pp. 59–81). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
  • Wenglenski, S. (2006). Regards sur la mobilité au travail des classes populaires. Une exploration du cas parisien [Looking at the mobility of popular classes during work. An assessment of the case of Paris]. Cahiers scientifiques du transport, 49, 103–127.
  • Widmer, E., Viry, G., & Kaufmann, V. (2010). The process of becoming mobile. In N. Schneider & B. Collet (Eds.), Mobile living across Europe II. Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in cross-national comparison (pp. 113–129). Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
  • Wiel, M. (1999). La transition urbaine ou le passage de la ville pédestre à la ville motorisée [The urban transition, or the shift from the pedestrian to the motorized city]. Sprimont, Belgium: Mardaga.
  • Zahavi, Y., & Talvitie, A. (1980). Regularities in travel time and money expenditure. Transportation Research Record, 750, 13–19.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.