“Theorizing” regime theory: A city-regional perspective

References

• Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. S. (1984). Dictionary of sociology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J., Shin, M., & Bettoni, G. (2002). City versus metropolis: The Northern League in the Milan metropolitan area. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26, 266–283. doi:10.1111/ijur.2002.26.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2007). The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1478–1496. doi:10.1068/a38230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 365–378. doi:10.1111/ijur.1999.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2016). Liverpool city region business leaders back Joe for Metro Mayor. Retrieved from http://teamjoe.co.uk/news/liverpool-city-region-business-leaders-back-joe-for-metro-mayor/
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., & Feiock, R. C. (2010). Core–peripheral structure and regional governance: Implications of Paul Krugman’s new economic geography for public administration. Public Administration Review, 70, 494–499. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ave Arup and Partners Ltd. (2013). Stage two of the Chester Green Belt Study: Technical site assessment. London, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2013). The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the Labor government’s English regional experiment? Planning Practice and Research, 28, 83–103. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.694314
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, K. (1996). Partnerships, business elites and urban politics: New forms of governance in an English city? Urban Studies, 33, 539–555. doi:10.1080/00420989650011906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., & Eberlein, B. (1999). The Europeanization of regional policies: Patterns of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 6, 329–348. doi:10.1080/135017699343748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichard, E. (2016). Liverpool case study. In D. K. Carter (Ed.), Remaking post-industrial cities: Lessons from North America and Europe (pp. 153–170). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P. (2008). The construction of images of people and place: Labeling Liverpool and stereotyping Scousers. Cities, 25, 355–369. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Boogers, M., & Tops, P. (2006). Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guidelines. Public Administration Review, 66, 546–553. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, T., Rydin, Y., & Stoker, G. (1989). Remaking planning: The politics of urban change in the thatcher years. London, England: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (1999). Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: Governance in AIDS politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 45–69. doi:10.1111/ijur.1999.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership. (2014). Cheshire and Warrington matters: A strategic and economic plan for Cheshire and Warrington. Middlewich, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cheshire East Council, Cheshire West and Chester, Warrington Borough Council, & Cheshire and Warrington Enterprise Commission. (2010). Unleashing the potential of Cheshire and Warrington: Draft sub regional strategy. Middlewich, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Owens, S. (2006). Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 403–421. doi:10.1068/c0416j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006). Town and country planning in the UK (14th ed.). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2002). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 1–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.00111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I., Haughton, G., & Hincks, S. (2015). “A good geography is whatever it needs to be”: The Atlantic gateway and evolving spatial imaginaries in north west England. In P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling, & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Soft spaces: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 25–44). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2011). Enterprise zone prospectus. London, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining urban regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 7–19. doi:10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyble, L. N. (2007). Revolt against sprawl transportation and the origins of the Marin County growth-control regime. Journal of Urban History, 34, 38–66. doi:10.1177/0096144207308049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkin, S. L. (1985). Twentieth century urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 7(2), 11–28. doi:10.1111/juaf.1985.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Enright, M. J. (2000). The globalization of competition and the localization of competitive advantage: Policies towards regional clustering. In N. Hood & S. Young (Eds.), The globalization of multinational enterprise activity and economic development (pp. 303–331). London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2009). Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 356–377. doi:10.1177/1078087408324000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., Freytag, T., Hoyler, M., & Mager, C. (2005). Rhine–Main: Qualitative analysis of service business connections. London, England: Institute of Community Studies/The Young Foundation & Polynet Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisken, F., & Norris, D. F. (2001). Regionalism reconsidered. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 467–478. doi:10.1111/juaf.2001.23.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2005). Metropolitan governance in Germany. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 151–168). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsborough, J. F. (2003). Business organizations as regional actors: The politics of regional cooperation in metropolitan America. Polity, 35, 555–572. doi:10.1086/POLv35n4ms3235453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getimis, P., & Hlepas, N. (2005). The emergence of metropolitan governance in Athens. In H. Heinelt & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 63–80). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1465–1474. doi:10.1002/smj.v29:13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersig, N. (2008). Multilevel urban governance and the “European city”: Discussing metropolitan reforms in Stockholm and Helsinki. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Research.
   Google Scholar
• Council, Knowsley Council, Sefton Council, St Helens Council, Wirral Council, Liverpool Council, and Merseyside Integrated Transport Authority. (2013). Liverpool city region: Review of strategic governance arrangements. Liverpool, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, P., & Jouve, B. (2008). In search of a stable urban regime for Montreal: Issues and challenges in metropolitan development. Urban Research & Practice, 1, 18–35. doi:10.1080/17535060701795322
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K. (2002). Regimes and regional governance: The case of Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 403–423. doi:10.1111/juaf.2002.24.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K. (2004). Developing regional regimes: A comparison of two metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 455–477. doi:10.1111/juaf.2004.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of regional governing systems: A comparative study of city regions in North America. London, England: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A. (1997). Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities? European Urban and Regional Studies, 4, 291–314. doi:10.1177/096977649700400401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, A., Wilks-Heeg, S., & Hutchins, M. (2000). Business, government and the business of urban governance. Urban Studies, 37, 975–994. doi:10.1080/00420980050011190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2013). Configuring the new “regional world”: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, 47, 55–74. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.644239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2014). Rethinking city-regionalism as the production of new non-state spatial strategies: The case of Peel Holdings Atlantic Gateway Strategy. Urban Studies, 51, 2315–2335. doi:10.1177/0042098013493481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henton, D. C., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (1997). Grassroots leaders for a new economy: How civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. (2009). Local democracy, Economic development and construction act 2009. Norwich, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. (2010). Local growth; Realizing every place’s potential. London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. (2015). Liverpool city region devolution agreement. London, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Heseltine, M., & Leahy, T. (2011). Rebalancing Britain: Policy or slogan? Liverpool city region—Building on its strengths: An independent report. London, England: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Howell‐Moroney, M. (2008). The Tiebout hypothesis 50 years later: Lessons and lingering challenges for metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Public Administration Review, 68, 97–109. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyler, M., Freytag, T., & Mager, C. (2006). Advantageous fragmentation? Reimagining metropolitan governance and spatial planning in Rhine–Main. Built Environment, 32(2), 124–136. doi:10.2148/benv.32.2.124
   Google Scholar
• InvestSefton. (2013). Combined authority for Merseyside “in six months.” Retrieved from http://www.investsefton.com/combined-authority-for-merseyside-in-six-months/
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 29–45. doi:10.1111/issj.1998.50.issue-155
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., Savitch, H. V., & Haddock, S. V. (1997). The political economy of urban regimes: A comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 348–377. doi:10.1177/107808749703200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, R. M. (2000). Business coalitions as a force for regionalism. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 154–180). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). Meta-governance as network management. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 199–214). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87, 818–836. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2005a). Introduction. In D. Kübler & H. Heinelt (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 1–7). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2005b). Metropolitan governance, democracy and the dynamics of place. In D. Kübler & H. Heinelt (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 8–29). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lackowska, M. (2009). Why is voluntary co-operation condemned to failure? Reflections on the Polish and German background. Lex localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 7, 347–369. doi:10.4335/7.4.347-369(2009)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria, M. (1997). Introduction: Reconstructing urban regime theory. In M. Lauria (Ed.), Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy (pp. 1–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, S., & Game, C. (1991). English metropolitan government since abolition: An evaluation of the abolition of the English metropolitan county councils. Public Administration, 69(2), 141–170. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre, C. (1998). Metropolitan government and governance in Western countries: A critical review. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22, 9–25. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, C. (1998). Regional growth management regime: The case of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 363–394. doi:10.1111/juaf.1998.20.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverpool City Council. (2012). Liverpool’s city deal. Retrieved from http://liverpool.gov.uk/council/performance-and-spending/budgets-and-finance/city-deal/
   Google Scholar
• Liverpool City Region Local Enterprise Partnership. (2012). Business plan 2012–2013. Liverpool, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson elected chair of city region. (2015, December 18). BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-35137293
   Google Scholar
• Melnick, R., & Hall, J. S. (2015). Regional roles and relationships: A fifty-year evolution of governance in metropolitan Phoenix, 1960–2008. In D. Phares (Ed.), Governing metropolitan regions in the 21st century (pp. 185–204). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. Y., & Cox, R. W. (2015). Governing the metropolitan region: America’s new frontier. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–332. doi:10.1086/226311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory the challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 810–835. doi:10.1177/10780870122185109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. J. (2005). Power and governance: Metropolitan governance in France. Urban Studies, 42, 783–800. doi:10.1080/00420980500060426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (2001a). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 557–571. doi:10.1111/juaf.2001.23.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (2001b). Whither metropolitan governance? Urban Affairs Review, 36, 532–550. doi:10.1177/10780870122184984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C., & Garnell, C. (2006). Regeneration and retail in Liverpool: A new approach. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 5, 292–304. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rlp.5100029
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. (2016). UK city regions: Policies, performance and prospects. Town Planning Review, 87, 629–653. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.42a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., & Ayres, S. (2006). New patterns of governance in the English region: Assessing their implications for spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 909–927. doi:10.1068/c49m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel. (2015). Delivering sustainable regeneration. Retrieved from http://www.peel.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 223–243. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
   Google Scholar
• Place North West. (2011). Liverpool LEP to merge with Mersey partnership. Retrieved from https://www.placenorthwest.co.uk/news/liverpool-lep-to-merge-with-mersey-partnership/
   Google Scholar
• Plans for Merseyside combined authority mooted. (2013, September 6). BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-23989196
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., & Gibbons, L. (2011, September 13). Network interference? New Start. Retrieved from https://newstartmag.co.uk/articles/network-interference/
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L., & Townsend, A. (2013). Rescaling of planning and its interface with economic development. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 104–121. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699236
   Google Scholar
• Rodwell, D. (2008). Urban regeneration and the management of change: Liverpool and the historic urban landscape. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 14, 83–106. doi:10.1080/13556207.2008.10785025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, S. A. (1997). Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development. European Planning Studies, 5, 3–23. doi:10.1080/09654319708720381
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, W., & Price, L. (2013). Local economic strategy development under regional development agencies and local enterprise partnerships: Applying the lens of the multiple streams framework. Local Economy, 28, 852–862. doi:10.1177/0269094213500622
   Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 3–18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2012). Who makes the (new) metropolis? Cross-border coalition and urban development in Paris. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1875–1895. doi:10.1068/a44632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitch, H. V., & Vogel, R. K. (2000). Metropolitan consolidation versus metropolitan governance in Louisville. State & Local Government Review, 32, 198–212. doi:10.1177/0160323X0003200305
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint‐decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–278. doi:10.1111/padm.1988.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint‐decision trap revisited. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 845–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharman, L. (2016). Need for elected mayor puts Cheshire devolution bid on hold. Retrieved from http://www.localgov.co.uk/Need-for-elected-mayor-puts-Cheshire-devolution-bid-on-hold/41031
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theoretical approaches to metagovernance. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 169–182). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1995). Regime theory and urban politics. In D. Judge & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 54–71). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 195–212. doi:10.1068/c120195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1–28. doi:10.1111/juaf.1993.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. (2005). Looking back to look forward reflections on urban regime analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 309–341. doi:10.1177/1078087404270646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, J. A. (2004). Voluntary regional councils and the new regionalism: Effective governance in the smaller metropolis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 51–63. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. K., & Nezelkewicz, N. (2002). Metropolitan planning organizations and the new regionalism: The case of Louisville. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32, 107–129. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (1996). Rereading urban regime theory: A sympathetic critique. Geoforum, 27, 427–438. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(97)87197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, C. J. (1971). Metropolitan federation reconsidered. Urban Affairs Review, 6, 411–420. doi:10.1177/107808747100600402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2003). “In the shadow of hierarchy”: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area, 35, 6–14.doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, K. (2013). Merseyside combined authority plans outlined. Retrieved from http://www.lgcplus.com/briefings/corporate-core/governance/merseyside-combined-authority-plans-outlined/5062223.article
   Google Scholar
• Wirral Borough Council. (2014). Liverpool city region combined authority. Retrieved from https://www.wirral.gov.uk/my-services/council-and-democracy/how-council-governed/liverpool-city-region-combined-authority
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2014). The application of strategic spatial planning under regionalist and localist approaches to public policy ( Unpublished doctoral thesis), The University of Manchester, England.
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2015). Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 30, 132–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2016a). Exploring new systems of regionalism: An English case study. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 50, 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2016b). Meta-governance and soft projects: A hypothetical model for regional policy integration. Land Use Policy, 59, 251–259. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., & Baker, M. (2016a). Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the north west region of England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 900–926. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., & Baker, M. (2016b). Strategic spatial planning under regime governance and localism: Experiences from the north west of England. Town Planning Review, 87, 681–703. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. (2011). Metropolitan governance in Stuttgart: New regionalism per excellence? In H. Heinelt, E. Razin, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), Metropolitan governance—Different paths in contrasting contexts: Germany and Israel (pp. 189–205). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar