Metropolitan planning in a vacuum: Lessons on regional equity planning from Baltimore’s Sustainable Communities Initiative

References

• Arias, J. S., Beckerman, S., Hirsch, J., Draper, S., Zivetz, G. C., Kadin, D., … Yelen, J. (2016). HUD sustainable communities initiative: The effects and impacts of regional planning grants on planning and equity in the Bay Area, the Puget sound region, and the twin cities. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, J. S., Draper-Zivetz, S., & Martin, A. (2017). The impacts of the sustainable communities initiative regional planning grants on planning and equity in three metropolitan regions. Cityscape, 19, 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltimore County Department of Planning. (2016). HUD Conciliation Agreement; Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from  https://www.baltimorecountymd.gov/Agencies/planning/fairhousing/hudconciliation.html
   Google Scholar
• Baltimore Sustainable Communities Consortium (Opportunity Collaborative). (2011). Regional Planning Grant Application. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, C., & Pastor, M. (2015). Equity, growth, and community: What the nation can learn from Americas metro areas. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, C., & Pastor, M. (2015b). Whither resilient regions? Equity, growth and community. The Journal of Urban Affairs, 38, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. The American Economic Review, 106, 855–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citizens Planning and Housing Association. (2014). Giving Our Region a Chance: Results from the Opportunity Collaborative’s First Round of Education and Engagement. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1975). Working toward redistributive justice. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 41, 317–318. doi:10.1080/01944367508977676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresser, M., & Broadwater, L. (2015, June 25). Hogan says no to red line, yes to purple. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-hogan-transportation-20150624-story
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2007). 100 years: Baltimore seals its borders. Baltimore Magazine. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/2007/12/1/100-years-baltimore-seals-its-borders
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. (2000). The death and life of American regional planning. In B. Katz (Ed.), Reflections on regionalism (pp. 107–126). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, K. T., Chapple, K., Mattiuzzi, E., & Zuk, M. (2015). Collaboration and equity in regional sustainability planning in California: Challenges in implementation. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 7(4), 1–25. doi:10.5070/P2CJPP7428924
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1975). Planning for declining and poor cities. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 41, 305–307. doi:10.1080/01944367508977673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberle, L. C., McReynolds, B., Sizemore, S., & Schilling, J. (2017). HUD’s sustainable communities initiative: An emergining model of place-based federal policy and collaborative capacity building. Cityscape, 17, 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hexter, K. W., & Kaufman, S. (2017). Planning without agency: Vibrant NEO 2040. Cityscape, 19, 135–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G., & Lewis, R. (2011). Regional planning for sustainability and hegemony of metropolitan regionalism. In E. Seltzer & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Regional planning in America: Practice and prospect (pp. 176–221). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N. 1982. A retrospective view of equity planning: Cleveland, 1969–1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48,163–174 (Reprinted in Kruecke­berg, Donald A., ed. 1983. Introduction to planning history in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, T. W., & Reckhow, S. (2012). Network governance and regional equity: Shared agendas or problematic partners? Planning Theory, 12(2), 115–138. doi:10.1177/1473095212455189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Knaap, E., & Knaap, G. (2013). Opportunity mapping: A conceptual analysis and application to the Baltimore metropolitan area. Paper presented at the 2013 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, P. (1994). Advocacy planning as a bridge between the professional and the political. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 143–146. doi:10.1080/01944369408975563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. S. (2014). The sustainable communities initiative: Collective impact in practice. Community Investments, 26, 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland Manual On-Line. (2017). Local Government: Intercounty and Regional Agencies: Baltimore Metropolitan Council, Historical Evolution. Webpage accessed September 16 2017. Retrieved from https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/35interc/01balth.html
   Google Scholar
• Meck, S. (ed). (2002). Growing smart legislative guidebook. Chicago, Illinois: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin & Lonergan Associates, Inc. (2012). Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice: Baltimore Metropolitan Region. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education (NCSG). (2013). Technical memorandum #2: Measures of opportunity in the Baltimore metropolitan region. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (1994). Killing a cog: The death and reincarnation of the Baltimore regional council of governments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 16, 155–167. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1994.tb00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opportunity Collaborative. (2014). Housing Plan “Strong Communities, Strong Region: THE Baltimore Regional Housing Plan and Fair Housing Equity Assessment.” Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Opportunity Collaborative. (2015). Baltimore Regional Plan for Sustainable Development. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, M., & Benner, C. (2011). Planning for equity, fighting for justice. In E. Seltzer & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Regional planning in Am.erica: Practice and prospect (pp. 83–115). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Rosenbloom, S., Levy, D., Oo, E., Knaap, G., Sartori, J., & Chakraborty, A. (2013). Can federal efforts advance federal and local de-siloing? Lessons from the HUD-EPA-DOT partnership for sustainable communities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Piven, F. (1975). Planning and class interests. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 41, 308–310. doi:10.1080/01944367508977674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, G. (1982). Apartheid Baltimore style: The residential segregation ordinances of 1910–1913. Maryland Law Review, 42, 289–328.
   Google Scholar
• Reece, J., & Gambhir, S. (2008). The Geography of Opportunity: Review of Opportunity Mapping Research Initiatives. Columbus, OH: The Kirwan Institute, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, B., & Peter, R. 2014. Housing mobility strategies. Presentation at BPI / CURL Knowledge Exchange, Loyola University, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2015). Housing policy in the United States (Third ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Bill 547. (2014). Maryland Senate.
   Google Scholar
• The Brookings Institution. (2007). Blueprint for American Prosperity: Unleashing the potential of a metropolitan nation. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson v. HUD. (2001). Amended complaint. Civil Action No.: MJG-95-309
   Google Scholar
• Tregoning, H. (2015). Coming Full circle: The innovation of HUD’s sustainable communities initiative. Cityscape, 17, 189–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2010). HUD awards nearly $100 million in new grants to promote smarter and sustainable planning for jobs and economic growth. Retrieved from. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2010/HUDNo.10-233
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2011). Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for HUD’s Fiscal Year 2011 Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Program. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2016). Office of sustainable communities: Sustainable communities initiative. Retrieved from. http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/hudprograms/sci
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., Becker, W., Judelsohn, A., & Hall, E. (2017). Civic infrastructure and sustainable regional planning: Insights from the sustainable communities initiative regional planning grantees. Cityscape, 19, 63–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Y. (2014, October 31). Nearly 74,000 sign up for Baltimore’s section 8 wait list. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/bs-md-ci-section-8-20141031-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Zapata, M. A., & Bates, L. K. (2016). Equity planning or equitable opportunities? The construction of equity in the HUD sustainable communities regional planning grants. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36, 1–14.
   Google Scholar