1,509
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Immigrant integration and receptivity policy formation in welcoming cities

References

  • Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of the multiple-streams approach in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 221–227. doi:10.1080/13876988.2016.1174410
  • Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 659–671. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Cairney, P., & Jones, M. D. (2016). Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37–58. doi:10.1111/psj.v44.1
  • Carpio, G., Irazábal, C., & Pulido, L. (2011). Right to the suburb? Rethinking Lefebvre and immigrant activism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2), 185–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00535.x
  • City of Chicago. (2012). The Chicago New Americans plan: Building a thriving and welcoming city. Chicago, IL: Author.
  • De Graauw, E., & Vermeulen, F. (2016). Cities and the politics of immigrant integration: A comparison of Berlin, Amsterdam, New York City, and San Francisco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 989–1012. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126089
  • De Jong, G. F., & Steinmetz, M. (2004). Receptivity attitudes and the occupational attainment of male and female immigrant workers. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 91–116.
  • De Jong, G. F., & Tran, Q.-G. (2001). Warm welcome, cool welcome: Mapping receptivity toward immigrants in the U.S. Population Today, 29(8). Retrieved from https://www.prb.org/warmwelcomecoolwelcomemappingreceptivitytowardimmigrantsintheus/
  • Dekker, R., Emilsson, H., Krieger, B., & Scholten, P. (2015). A local dimension of integration policies? A comparative study of Berlin, Malmö, and Rotterdam. International Migration Review, 49(3), 633–658. doi:10.1111/imre.12133
  • Ehrkamp, P., & Nagel, C. (2014). Under the radar: Undocumented immigrants, christian faith communities, and the precarious spaces of welcome in the U.S. South. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), 319–328. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.858573
  • Ellis, M. (2006). Unsettling immigrant geographies: US immigration and the politics of scale. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 97(1), 49–58. doi:10.1111/tesg.2006.97.issue-1
  • Espenshade, T. J., & Hempstead, K. (1996). contemporary american attitudes towards u.s. Immigration. International Migration Review, 30(2), 535–570.
  • Fetzer, J. S. (2000). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States, France, and Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Filomeno, F. A. (2015). The migration-development nexus in local immigration policy: Baltimore city and the hispanic diaspora. Urban Affairs Review. doi:10.1177/1078087415614920
  • Filomeno, F. A. (2017). Theories of local immigration policy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Furuseth, O., Smith, H., & McDaniel, P. N. (2015). Belonging in charlotte: Multiscalar differences in local immigration politics and policies. Geographical Review, 105(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/gere.2014.105.issue-1
  • Garrison, J. (2014). Nashville immigration evolution spurs Obama visit. The Tennessean, December 8. Retrieved from https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2014/12/06/president-obama-nashville-immigrant-evolution/20023631/
  • Gebhardt, D. (2016). When the state takes over: Civic integration programmes and the role of cities in immigrant integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(5), 742–758. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1111132
  • Harden, S. B., McDaniel, P. N., Smith, H. A., Zimmern, E., & Brown, K. E. (2015). Speaking of change in Charlotte, North Carolina: How museums can shape immigrant receptivity in a community navigating rapid cultural change. Museums & Social Issues, 10(2), 117–133. doi:10.1179/1559689315Z.00000000039
  • Harwood, S. A., & Lee, S. S. (2015). Immigrant-friendly community plans: Rustbelt efforts to attract and retain immigrants. In M. Burayidi (Ed.), Cities and the politics of difference: Multiculturalism and diversity in urban planning  (pp. 236–264). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Hay, I. (2005). Qualitative research methods in human geography. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Housel, J., Saxen, C., & Wahlrab, T. (2018). Experiencing intentional recognition: Welcoming immigrants in Dayton, Ohio. Urban Studies, 55(2), 384–405. doi:10.1177/0042098016653724
  • Huang, X., & Liu, C. (2018). Welcoming cities: Immigration policy at the local government level. Urban Affairs Review, 54(1), 3–32. doi:10.1177/1078087416678999
  • Jensen, L. (2006). New immigrant settlements in rural america: problems, prospects, and policies. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.
  • Jiménez, T. R. (2011). Immigrants in the United States: How well are they integrating into society? Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
  • Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Raney, H. L., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 13–36. doi:10.1111/psj.v44.1
  • Jones-Correa, M. (2011). All immigration is local: Receiving communities and their role in successful integration. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
  • Kerr, J., McDaniel, P., & Guinan, M. (2014). Reimagining the midwest: Immigration initiatives and the capacity of local leadership. Chicago, IL: The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1993). How do issues get on public policy agendas? In W. J. Wilson (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 40–50). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Leitner, H., & Strunk, C. (2014). Assembling insurgent citizenship: Immigrant advocacy struggles in the Washington DC metropolitan area. Urban Geography, 35(7), 943–964. doi:10.1080/02723638.2014.943582
  • Lenton, S., & Allsop, S. (2010). A tale of CIN—The cannabis infringement notice scheme in Western Australia. Addiction, 105(5), 808–816. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02913.x
  • Lester, T. W., & Nguyen, M. T. (2016). The economic integration of immigrants and regional resilience. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(1), 42–60. doi:10.1111/juaf.12205
  • Liu, C., & Jayakar, K. (2012). The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: Comparative analysis of China and India. Telecommunications Policy, 36(1), 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.11.016
  • Majka, T., & Longazel, J. (2017). Becoming welcoming: Organizational collaboration and immigrant integration in Dayton, Ohio. Public Integrity, 19(2), 151–163. doi:10.1080/10999922.2016.1256697
  • Marston, S., Ward, K., & Jones, III, J. P. (2009). Scale. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • McDaniel, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and innovation in welcoming cities: Lessons from Chicago, Dayton, and Nashville. Washington, DC: American Immigration Council.
  • McDaniel, P. N. (2018). Shared humanity, city branding, and municipal immigrant integration initiatives in the Southeastern United States. Southeastern Geographer, 58(3), 250–281. doi:10.1353/sgo.2018.0028
  • McDaniel, P. N., Rodriguez, D. X., & Kim, A. J. (2017). Receptivity and the welcoming cities movement: Advancing a regional immigrant integration policy framework in Metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. Papers in Applied Geography, 3(4), 355–379. doi:10.1080/23754931.2017.1367957
  • McDaniel, P. N., & Smith, H. A. (2017). Receptivity’s construction in public schools: A component of immigrant integration in an emerging gateway. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18(4), 1061–1081. doi:10.1007/s12134-017-0522-4
  • Migration Policy Institute. (2015). NCIIP: Task force on New Americans (White House). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Mollenkopf, J., & Pastor, M. (Eds.). (2016). Unsettled Americans: Metropolitan context and civic leadership for immigrant integration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Mosier, S. L. (2013). Cookies, candy, and coke: Examining state sugar-sweetened-beverage tax policy from a multiple streams approach. International Review of Public Administration, 18(1), 93–120. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805242
  • Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model and the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24, 459–482. doi:10.2307/3235165
  • Nashville Mayor’s Office. (2014). Mayor’s Office of New Americans. Nashville, TN: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County. Retrieved from https://www.nashville.gov/Mayors-Office/Diversity-and-Inclusion/New-Americans.aspx
  • Pastor, M., & Mollenkopf, J. (2012). Struggling over strangers or receiving with resilience? The metropolitics of immigrant integration. In M. Weir, N. Pindus, H. Wial, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Urban and regional policy and its effects: Building resilient regions (Vol. 4, pp. 100–147). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Pastor, M., Ortiz, R., & de Graauw, E. (2015). Opening minds, opening doors, opening communities: Cities leading for immigrant integration. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration, University of Southern California.
  • Penninx, R. (2016). European cities in search of knowledge for their integration policies. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe  (pp. 99–115). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pottie-Sherman, Y. (2018). Austerity urbanism and the promise of immigrant- and refugee centered urban revitalization in the US Rust Belt. Urban Geography, 39(3), 438–457. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1342398
  • Price, M. (2014). Cities Welcoming Immigrants: Local Strategies to Attract and Retain Immigrants in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration.
  • Ramakrishnan, S. K., & Gulasekaram, P. (2012). The importance of the political in immigration federalism. Arizona State Law Journal, 44(4), 1431–1488. Retrieved from http://arizonastatelawjournal.org
  • Rawat, P., & Morris, J. C. (2016). Kingdon’s ‘streams’ model at thirty: Still relevant in the 21st century? Politics & Policy, 44(4), 608–638. doi:10.1111/polp.12168
  • Reitz, J. G. (1998). Warmth of the welcome: The social causes of economic success in different nations and cities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Robinson, S. E., & Eller, W. S. (2010). Testing the separation of problems and solutions in subnational policy streams. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 199–216. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00358.x
  • Rodriguez, D. X., McDaniel, P. N., & Ahebee, M. D. (2018). Welcoming America: A case study of municipal immigrant integration, receptivity, and community practice. Journal of Community Practice, 3, 348–357. doi:10.1080/10705422.2018.1477081
  • Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Fostering the development of policy theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 261–275). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Fostering the development of policy theory. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 321–336). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Schuch, J. C., & Wang, Q. (2015). Immigrant businesses, place-making, and community development: A case from an emerging immigrant gateway. Journal of Cultural Geography, 32(2), 214–241. doi:10.1080/08873631.2014.995403
  • Singer, A. (2015). Metropolitan immigrant gateways revisited, 2014. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Singer, A., Hardwick, S. W., & Brettell, C. B. (2008). Twenty-first century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in Suburban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Smith, H. A., & Ley, D. (2008). Even in Canada? The multiscalar construction and experience of concentrated immigrant poverty in gateway cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(3), 686–713. doi:10.1080/00045600802104509
  • Suro, R., & Singer, A. (2002). Latino growth in Metropolitan America: Changing patterns, new locations. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). 2000 Decennial census. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). 2013 American community survey 5-year estimates. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). 2014 American community survey 1-year estimates. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov.
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2008). Fact sheet: Task force on New Americans. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/files/article/taskforceFS_18dec2008.pdf
  • Varsanyi, M. W. (2010). Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Varsanyi, M. W., Lewis, P. G., Provine, D., & Decker, S. (2012). A multi-layered jurisdictional patchwork: Immigration federalism in the United States. Law & Policy, 34(2), 138–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00356.x
  • Vitiello, D. (2014). The politics of immigration and suburban revitalization: Divergent responses in adjacent Pennsylvania towns. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(3), 519–533. doi:10.1111/juaf.12052
  • Walker, K. E. (2015). The spatiality of local immigration policies in the United States. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 106(4), 486–498. doi:10.1111/tesg.2015.106.issue-4
  • Walker, K. E., & Leitner, H. (2011). The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography, 32(2), 156–178. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.2.156
  • Wang, Q. (2013). Beyond ethnic enclaves? Exploring the spatial distribution of Latino-owned employer firms in two US immigration gateways. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(5), 569–589. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00644.x
  • Wang, Q., & Morrell, E. (2015). Gender and entrepreneurship revisited from a community perspective: Experiences in a new immigrant gateway and beyond. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2645–2662. doi:10.1177/0308518X15615366
  • Welcome Dayton. (2011). Welcome Dayton plan: Immigrant friendly city. Dayton, OH: City of Dayton.
  • Welcoming America. (2017). FAQs. Retrieved from https://www.welcomingamerica.org/about/faq
  • White House. (2014). Presidential memorandum—Creating welcoming communities and fully integrating immigrants and refugees. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/21/presidential-memorandum-creating-welcoming-communities-and-fully-integra
  • White House. (2015a). Building welcoming communities campaign: White house partners with local communities to strengthen immigrant integration efforts. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/bwcc_fact_sheet_updated.pdf
  • White House. (2015b). Strengthening welcoming communities by welcoming all residents: A federal strategic action plan on immigrant and refugee integration. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/final_tf_newamericans_report_4-14-15_clean.pdf
  • White House. (2015c). White house task force on New Americans: One-year progress report. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/image/tfna_progress_report_final_12_15_15.pdf
  • Williamson, A. F. (2011). Beyond the passage of time: Local government response in new immigrant destinations (Doctoral Dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Williamson, A. F. (2018). Welcoming New Americans? Local governments and immigrant incorporation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Williamson, R. (2015). Towards a multi-scalar methodology: The challenges of studying social transformation and international migration. In S. Castles, D. Ozkul, & M. A. Cubas (Eds.), Social transformation and migration (pp. 17–32). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Winders, J. (2013). Nashville in the New Millennium: Immigrant settlement, urban transformation, and social belonging. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 25–58). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zahariadis, N. (2016). Delphic Oracles: Ambiguity, institutions, and multiple streams. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 3–12. doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9243-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.