Local politicians’ advice networks and the prospect of metropolitan civil society

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1999). Expanding intergovernmental management’s hidden dimensions. The American Review of Public Administration, 29(4), 352–369. doi:10.1177/02750749922064472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, D., Lewis, J. M., & Considine, M. (2011). How politicians and bureaucrats network: A comparison across governments. Public Administration, 89(4), 1274–1292. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. (2009a). Recent developments in the study of interjurisdictional agreements: An overview and assessment. State and Local Government Review, 41(2), 133–142. doi:10.1177/0160323X0904100208
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A. (2009b). Regional integration through contracting networks: An empirical analysis of Institutional Collection Action Framework. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 378–402. doi:10.1177/1078087408323941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., & Carr, J. B. (2013). Mitigating uncertainty and risk in planning for regional preparedness: The role of bonding and bridging relationships. Urban Studies, 50(4), 709–724. doi:10.1177/0042098012455718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, S. A., Short, J. E., Jung, K., & Arlikatti, S. (2015). Intergovernmental cooperation in the provision of public safety: Monitoring mechanisms embedded in interlocal agreements. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 401–410. doi:10.1111/puar.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Lundin, M., & Öberg, P. (2017). How learning aggregates: A social network analysis of learning between Swedish municipalities. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 903–926. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1342626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (2004). The extrapolation problem: How can we learn from the experience of others? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 205–220. doi:10.1002/pam.20000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, J. E. (2002). Counties as service delivery agents: Changing expectations and roles. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., Brower, R. S., Choi, S. O., Goa, W. X., Jang, H., Kwon, M., & Word, J. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. F. (2008). Innovations in government: Research, recognition, and replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. F. (2014). Understanding intergovernmental relations, twenty-five years hence. State and Local Government Review, 46(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/0160323x13520461
   Google Scholar
• Catlaw, T. J. (2009). Governance and networks at the limits of representation. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 478–498. doi:10.1177/0275074008323975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, D. W. (1989). Coordination without hierarchy: Informal structures in multiorganizational systems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., & Alexander, D. (2009). Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, S. J., Leifeld, P., McClurg, S. D., & Rolfe, M. (2017). Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 237–251. doi:10.1111/ajps.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1967). The city in the future of democracy. American Political Science Review, 61(4), 953–970. doi:10.2307/1953398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, D. J. (1972). American federalism: A view from the States (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Crowell.
   Google Scholar
• Eulau, H., & Prewitt, K. (1973). Labyrinths of democracy: Adaptations, linkages, representation, and policies in urban politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. L. (2018). Connecting theory with practice: The institutional evolvement of U.S. counties functioning as regional service providers. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(8), 808–821. doi:10.1177/0275074017730399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (Ed.). (2004). Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.2013.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., & Park, H.-J. (2012). Administrators’ and elected officials’ collaboration networks: Selecting partners to reduce risk in economic development. Public Administration Review, 72(S1), S58–S68. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02659.x
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Tao, J., & Johnson, L. (2004). Institutional collective action: Social capital and the formation of regional partnerships. In R. C. Feiock (Ed.), Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation (pp. 124–146). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., Lee, I. W., Park, H. J., & Lee, K.-H. (2010). Collaboration networks among local elected officials: Information, commitment, and risk aversion. Urban Affairs Review, 46(2), 241–262. doi:10.1177/1078087409360509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 20(2), 305–324. doi:10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S., Khademian, A. M., Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. S. (2006). Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 89–99. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, Jr., F. J. (1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. H., Heaney, M. T., Nickerson, D. W., Padgett, J. F., & Sinclair, B. (2011). Causality in political networks. American Politics Research, 39(2), 437–480. doi:10.1177/1532673X10396310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics, 32(4), 701–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesema, H. P. (1971). Metropolitan political structure: Intergovernmental relations and political integration in the Quad-Cities. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, R. W. (1988). Regional councils of governments at the crossroads: Implications for intergovernmental management and networks. International Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 467–501. doi:10.1080/01900698808524598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. R., & Gibson, C. C. (2009). Balancing regionalism and localism: How institutions and incentives shape American transportation policy. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 633–648. doi:10.1111/ajps.2009.53.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. R., Henry, A. D., & Lubell, M. (2013). Political homophily and collaboration in regional planning networks. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 598–610. doi:10.1111/ajps.2013.57.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. R., & Loh, C. G. (2015). Spatial dynamics of vertical and horizontal intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(3), 270–288. doi:10.1111/juaf.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 238–262. doi:10.2307/4131473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. H. (1962). The metropolitan problem and American ideas. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K. (2004). Developing regional regimes: A comparison of two metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(4), 455–477. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K., Miller, D. Y., & Paytas, J. (2004). Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review, 40(2), 147–182. doi:10.1177/1078087404268077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V. (2010). Competition and cooperation: Local government joint ventures for economic development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 253–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00492.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, C. R., & Swanstrom, T. (2011). Justice and the American metropolis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilvert, C., & Swindell, D. (2013). Collaborative service delivery: What every local government manager should know. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 240–254. doi:10.1177/0160323X13513908
   Google Scholar
• Katz, B. (Ed.). (2000). Reflections on regionalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247–268. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, T. B., & Pelissero, J. P. (2003). City councils. In J. P. Pelissero (Ed.), Cities, politics, and policy: A comparative analysis (pp. 169–195). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, S.-W., Feiock, R. C., & Bae, J. (2014). The roles of regional organizations for interlocal resource exchange: Complement or substitute? The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 339–357. doi:10.1177/0275074012465488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S.-W., & Park, S.-C. (2014). Metropolitan governance: How regional organizations influence interlocal land use coordination. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5), 925–940. doi:10.1111/juaf.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., Lee, I. W., & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration networks in economic development policy: An exponential random graph model analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 547–573. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. (2008). Nonprofit community conferences: The role of alternative regional institutions in interlocal service delivery. State and Local Government Review, 40(3), 160–172. doi:10.1177/0160323X0804000303
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., Brandenburger, P. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). Interlocal service cooperation in U.S. cities: A social network explanation. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 268–278. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Carr, J. B. (2010). Prospects for centralizing services in an urban county: Evidence from eight self-organized networks of local public services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 449–470. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00512.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). City managers, career incentives, and municipal service decisions: The effects of managerial progressive ambition on interlocal service delivery. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 627–636. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, B. (1998). Regional cooperation and sustainable growth: Nine councils of government in northeastern Illinois. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(3), 327–342. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00425.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom, B. (2010). The Metropolitan mayors caucus: Institution building in a political fragmented metropolitan region. Urban Affairs Review, 46(1), 37–67. doi:10.1177/1078087410370670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Henry, A. D., & McCoy, M. (2010). Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 287–300. doi:10.1111/ajps.2010.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robbins, G. (Eds.). (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matkin, D. S. T., & Frederickson, H. G. (2009). Metropolitan governance: Institutional roles and interjurisdictional cooperation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(1), 45–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Cox, R. W. (2014). Governing the metropolitan region: America's new frontier. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Nelles, J. (2018). Discovering American regionalism: An introduction to regional intergovernmental organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell-Weaver, C., Miller, D., & Deal, Jr., R. (2000). Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 851–876. doi:10.1080/00420980050011127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin, M. (2009). Governing the tap: Special district governance and the new local politics of water. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J., O‘Neill, R., Michael Wilkes, J., & Kaufman, A. (2013). Contemporary challenges in local government: Evolving roles and responsibilities, structures, and processes. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 567–574. doi:10.1111/puar.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, Z. P. (2013). The connected city: How networks are shaping the modern metropolis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (2015). Metropolitan governance in America. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Jr., L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Public management in intergovernmental networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakerson, R. J. (1999). Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, V. (1965). A behavioral approach to the study of intergovernmental relations. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 359(1), 137–146. doi:10.1177/000271626535900115
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. doi:10.1017/S0003055400125973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K. (1997). Friends and competitors: Policy interactions between local governments in metropolitan areas. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 723–750. doi:10.1177/106591299705000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., & Oakerson, R. J. (2000). Regionalism, localism, and metropolitan governance: Suggestions from the research program on local public economies. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 169–179. doi:10.1177/0160323X0003200302
   Google Scholar
• Prewitt, K. (1970). The recruitment of political leaders: A study of citizen-politicians. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
   Google Scholar
• Protasel, G. J. (1989). Leadership in council-manager cities: The institutional implications. In H. G. Frederickson (Ed.), Ideal and practice in council-manager government (pp. 114–122). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, G., Lewis, J. M., & Wang, P. (2012). Statistical network analysis for analyzing policy networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 375–401. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Woolcock, J. (2004). Missing data in networks: Exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents. Social Networks, 26(3), 257–283. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., Berardo, R., & Feiock, R. C. (2014). Solving institutional collective action problems in multiplex networks. Complexity Governance & Networks, 1(1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). Governing U.S. metropolitan areas: Self-organizing and multiplex service networks. American Politics Research, 37(4), 801–823. doi:10.1177/1532673X09337466
   Google Scholar
• Siciliano, M. D. (2015). Advice networks in public organizations: The role of structure, internal competition, and individual attributes. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 548–559. doi:10.1111/puar.12362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 18(1), 89–110. doi:10.1111/gove.2005.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman, II., R. J. (1974). The rise of the city manager: A public professional in local government. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stork, D., & Richards, W. D. (1992). Nonrespondents in communication network studies: Problems and possibilities. Group & Organization Management, 17(2), 193–209. doi:10.1177/1059601192172006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, A. H. (1966). The political theory of American local government. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmaier, K., & Wood, C. (2002). Interlocal agreements as overlapping social network: Picket-fence regionalism in metropolitan Kansas City. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 585–598. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, J. A. (2004). Voluntary regional councils and the new regionalism: Effective governance in the smaller metropolis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 51–63. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., O‘Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2007). It’s where you are that matters: The networking behaviour of English local government officers. Public Administration, 85(3), 739–756. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2009). PNet: Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Hawthorn, VIC, Australia: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, M., Rongerude, J., & Ansell, C. K. (2009). Collaboration is not enough: Virtuous cycles of reform in transportation policy. Urban Affairs Review, 44(4), 455–489. doi:10.1177/1078087408322590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, M., Wolman, H., & Swanstrom, T. (2005). The calculus of coalitions: Cities, suburbs, and the metropolitan agenda. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 730–760. doi:10.1177/1078087405276200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikstrom, N. (1977). Councils of governments: A study of political incrementalism. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. (2008). The nature of metropolitan governance in urban America: A study of cooperation and conflict in the Kansas City region. Administration & Society, 40(5), 483–501. doi:10.1177/0095399708320186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S. (1973). Intergovernmental relations in large council-manager cities. American Politics Quarterly, 1(2), 151–188. doi:10.1177/1532673X7300100201
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S. (1990). Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 168–178. doi:10.2307/976864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wukich, C. (2014). Professional capital: Standards of performance that underlie interlocal cooperation. Public Administration Quarterly, 38(4), 573–604.
   Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. S. (2008). Governing interlocal cooperation: City council interests and the implications for public management. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 731–741. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00911.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. S. (2009). California county administrators as sellers and brokers of interlocal cooperation. State and Local Government Review, 41(3), 166–181. doi:10.1177/0160323X0904100302
   Google Scholar
• Zeemering, E. S. (2014). International connections for local government sustainability initiatives: Networks linking Detroit and Windsor. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 119–140. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00648.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. (1970). Metropolitan reform in the U.S.: An overview. Public Administration Review, 30(5), 531–543. doi:10.2307/974421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar