References
- Alam, K., & Mamun, S. A. K. (2017). Access to broadband Internet and labour force outcomes: A case study of the Western Downs Region, Queensland. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.011
- Alemanne, N. D., Mandel, L. H., & McClure, C. R. (2011). The rural public library as leader in community broadband services. Library Technology Reports, 47(6), 19–28. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/4554/5354
- Alizadeh, T. (2015). The spatial justice implications of telecommunication infrastructure: The socio-economic status of early National Broadband Network rollout in Australia. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 11(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2015.072156
- Alizadeh, T., & Farid, R. (2017). Political economy of telecommunication infrastructure: An investigation of the National Broadband Network early rollout and pork barrel politics in Australia. Telecommunications Policy, 41(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.02.002
- Alizadeh, T., Grubesic, T., & Helderop, E. (2020). Socio-spatial patterns of the National Broadband Network revealed: Lessons from greater Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane. Telecommunications Policy, 44(5), 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101941
- Alizadeh, T., Grubesic, T. H., & Helderop, E. (2017). Urban governance and big corporations in the digital economy: An investigation of socio-spatial implications of Google Fiber in Kansas City. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.007
- Apatov, E., Chappell, N., & Grimes, A. (2018). Is internet on the right track? The digital divide, path dependence, and the rollout of New Zealand’s ultra-fast broadband (Working paper 18-04). Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
- Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
- Baumgartner, J. (2019, February 14). Google Fiber: A timeline of the good, the bad & the ugly. LightReading. https://www.lightreading.com/services/broadband-services/google-fiber-a-timeline-of-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-/a/d-id/749461?page_number=1
- Campos-Castillo, C. (2015). Revisiting the first-level digital divide in the United States: Gender and race/ethnicity patterns, 2007–2012. Social Science Computer Review, 33(4), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314547617
- City Council of Austin, Texas. (2013a, August 22). Resolution 20130822-083. http://austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Telecommunications/Resolution_No._20130822-083_—_Google_Fiber.pdf
- City Council of Austin, Texas. (2013b, December 12). Resolution 20131212-070. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=203303
- City Council of Austin, Texas. (2014, August 28). Resolution 20140828-094. http://assets.austintexas.gov/austincouncilforum/93-20150729154608.pdf
- Dailey, D., Bryne, A., Powell, A., Karaganis, J., & Chung, J. (2010). Broadband adoption in low-income communities. Social Science Research Council.
- Devenyns, J. (2019, May 31). Austin’s Google Fiberhood smaller than promised. The Austin Monitor. https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/2019/05/austins-google-fiberhood-smaller-than-promised/
- Dinges, G. (2015, January 17). For select few, it’s a whole new Fiberhood. The Austin American-Statesman (pp. B5).
- Eligon, J. (2012, September 9). For Kansas City, Google Internet drive becomes civic cause. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/us/in-one-city-signing-up-for-internet-becomes-a-civic-cause.html
- Falch, M., & Henten, A. (2010). Public private partnerships as a tool for stimulating investments in broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.07.010
- Federal Communications Commission [FCC]. (2018). Fixed broadband deployment data from FCC form 477. https://www.fcc.gov/general/broadband-deployment-data-fcc-form-477
- Feiock, R. (1986). The political economy of urban service distribution: A test of the underclass hypothesis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 8(3), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1986.tb00146.x
- Flamm, K., & Chaudhuri, A. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6–7), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.006
- Florida, R., & Mellander, C. (2015). Segregated city: The economic geography of segregation in America’s metros. Martin Prosperity Institute.
- Freeman, J., Park, S., Middleton, C., & Allen, M. (2016). The importance of broadband for socio-economic development: A perspective from rural Australia. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 20, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1192
- Gerli, P., Wainwright, D., & Whalley, J. (2017). Infrastructure investment on the margins of the market: The role of niche infrastructure providers in the UK. Telecommunications Policy, 41(9), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.03.005
- Gómez-Barroso, J. L., & Feijóo, C. (2010). A conceptual framework for public-private interplay in the telecommunications sector. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.01.001
- Gonzales, A. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1050438
- Google. (2020). Community connections. https://fiber.google.com/communityconnections/
- Gramlich, E. M. (1994). Infrastructure investment: A review essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1176–1196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2728606
- Greenberg, A. J., Haney, D., Blake, K. D., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2018). Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. The Journal of Rural Health, 34(S1), s30–s38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12228
- Grisales, C. (2014a, October 16). Google Fiber to hit Austin in December. The Austin American-Statesman (pp. B1).
- Grisales, C. (2014b, December 5). Google Fiber sign-ups robust. The Austin American-Statesman (pp. B8).
- Grubesic, T. H. (2006). A spatial taxonomy of broadband regions in the United States. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2006.05.001
- Grubesic, T. H. (2015). The broadband provision tensor. Growth and Change, 46(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12083
- Grubesic, T. H. (2017). Broadband internet provision: Why geography matters. Regions Magazine, 306(1), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2017.11878970
- Grubesic, T. H., Helderop, E., & Alizadeh, T. (2019). Closing information asymmetries: A scale agnostic approach for exploring equity implications of broadband provision. Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.002
- Grubesic, T. H., & Mack, E. A. (2015). Broadband telecommunications and regional development. Routledge.
- Grubesic, T. H., & Murray, A. T. (2008). Sex offender residency and spatial equity. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(3), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9013-5
- Halegoua, G. (2015). Calling all ‘fiberhoods’: Google Fiber and the politics of visibility. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877913513690
- Hawkins, L. (2013, August 3). Google seeks non-profits for Fiber. The Austin American-Statesman (pp. B7).
- Hawkins, R. (2015, July 28). Replacement site for the Google Fiber Community Connections Program. Memorandum to Ellen Troxclair. Retrieved January 23, 2020, from http://assets.austintexas.gov/austincouncilforum/93-20150729153113.doc
- Helderop, E., Grubesic, T. H., & Alizadeh, T. (2019). Data deluge or data trickle? Difficulties in acquiring public data for telecommunications policy analysis. The Information Society, 35(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1574528
- Hovis, J., Schulhof, M., Baller, J., & Stelfox, A. (2016). The emerging world of broadband public–private partnerships: A business strategy and legal guide. Benton Foundation.
- Huygen, A. (2014, February 20). In Austin fiber wars, the little guy beats Google & AT&T to the punch. KUT News. https://www.kut.org/post/austin-fiber-wars-little-guy-beats-google-att-punch
- Kansas City. (2011). Development agreement. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from http://www.netcompetition.org/wp-content/uploads/Google-Kansas-Agreement1.pdf
- Kim, Y., & Orazem, P. F. (2017). Broadband internet and new firm location decisions in rural areas. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(1), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw082
- Kuby, M. J. (1987). Programming models for facility dispersion: The p‐dispersion and maxisum dispersion problems. Geographical Analysis, 19(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1987.tb00133.x
- Ladendorf, K., Hawkins, L., & Gaar, B. (2013, April 10). Thought F1 was fast? Google Fiber’s coming. The Austin American-Statesman (pp. A1).
- Lampland, E., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Santa Monica City Net: An incremental approach to building a fiber optic network. https://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/santa-monica-city-net-fiber-2014-2.pdf
- Lucey, P., & Mitchell, C. (2016). Successful strategies for broadband public-private partnerships. Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
- Mack, E. A., Dutton, W. H., Rikard, R. V., & Yankelevich, A. (2019). Mapping and measuring the information society: A social science perspective on the opportunities, problems, and prospects of broadband Internet data in the United States. The Information Society, 35(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1574526
- Mack, E. A., & Grubesic, T. H. (2014). US broadband policy and the spatio‐temporal evolution of broadband markets. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 6(3), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12042
- Marsh, S. (2020). NBN internet speeds recover after social distancing measures crippled network. 9News. https://tinyurl.com/y7pojh5v
- Medin, M. (2013). Google Fiber’s next stop: Austin, Texas. https://fiber.google.com/blog/2013/google-fibers-next-stop-austin-texas/
- Mejia, R. (2015). A pressure chamber of innovation: Google Fiber and flexible capital. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 12(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2015.1027240
- Mersand, S., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Udoh, E., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019). Public libraries as anchor institutions in smart communities: Current practices and future development. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3305–3314). Maui, Hawaii.
- Mims, C. (2019, August 24). Cities are saying no to 5G, citing health, aesthetics—And FCC bullying. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/cities-are-saying-no-to-5g-citing-health-aestheticsand-fcc-bullying-11566619391
- Murin, W. (1985). Contracting as a method of enhancing equity in the delivery of local government services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1985.tb00079.x
- Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2014). Fortifying large scale, geospatial networks: Implications for supervisory control and data acquisition systems. In Information Resource Management Association (Ed.), Crisis management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 224–246). IGI Global.
- National Digital Inclusion Alliance. (n.d.). Definitions. https://www.digitalinclusion.org/definitions/
- Nguyen, A., Mosadeghi, S., & Almario, C. V. (2017). Persistent digital divide in access to and use of the Internet as a resource for health information: Results from a California population-based study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 103, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.008
- Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e‐government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x
- Pick, J. B., Sarkar, A., & Johnson, J. (2015). United States digital divide: State level analysis of spatial clustering and multivariate determinants of ICT utilization. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 49, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2014.09.001
- Prieger, J. E., & Hu, W. M. (2008). The broadband digital divide and the nexus of race, competition, and quality. Information Economics and Policy, 20(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.01.001
- Rajabiun, R., & Middleton, C. (2018). Strategic choice and broadband divergence in the transition to next generation networks: Evidence from Canada and the US. Telecommunications Policy, 42(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.08.001
- Riddlesden, D., & Singleton, A. D. (2014). Broadband speed equity: A new digital divide? Applied Geography, 52, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.008
- Ruhle, E. O., Brusic, I., Kittl, J., & Ehrler, M. (2011). Next Generation Access (NGA) supply side interventions—An international comparison. Telecommunications Policy, 35(9–10), 794–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.06.001
- Samios, Z. (2020). NBN misled customers in Canberra on network switch. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://tinyurl.com/ydetwr58
- Seitz, H. (1995). The productivity and supply of urban infrastructures. The Annals of Regional Science, 29(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581802
- Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
- Singla, A., Shumberger, J., & Swindell, J. (2019). Paying for infrastructure in the post-recession era: Exploring the use of alternative funding and financing tools. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–23. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1660580
- Stanton, L., & Curran, J. (2015). Commissioners: Data, examples needed to address “digital redlining” concerns. Telecommunications Reports, 81(3), 6–8.
- Strover, S., Riedl, M. J., & Dickey, S. (2019). Scoping new policy frameworks for local broadband networks. SSRN 3427571.
- Telecom & Regulatory Affairs Department, City of Austin, Texas. (2013). 2013 City of Austin Google Fiber Community Connections Program application and instructions. http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Telecommunications/Sample_ApplicationSingle.pdf
- Telecom & Regulatory Affairs Department, City of Austin, Texas. (2015). Community Connections program 78744 site replacement: Eligible applicants. http://assets.austintexas.gov/austincouncilforum/93-20150729153535.xls
- Telecom & Regulatory Affairs Department, City of Austin, Texas. (2019). Community Connections program: 100 Gigabit speed (Google Fiber) Public Facilities administered through the City’s Office of Telecom & Regulatory Affairs (TARA) and Google Fiber [Data set]. City of Austin, Texas Open Data Portal. https://doi.org/10.26000/013.000012
- Telecom & Regulatory Affairs Department, City of Austin, Texas. (n.d.). Google Fiber Community Connections Program frequently asked questions. http://austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Telecommunications/FAQs.pdf
- Tranos, E., & Mack, E. A. (2016). Broadband provision and knowledge-intensive firms: A causal relationship? Regional Studies, 50(7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.965136
- Tretter, E. (2012). Austin restricted: Progressivism, zoning, private racial covenants, and the making of a segregated city. Report to the Institute for Urban Policy Research and Analysis. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/21232
- Trogdon, H. (2013). Lessons from Google Fiber: Why coordinated cost reductions to infrastructure access are necessary to achieve universal broadband deployment. The Federal Communications Law Journal, 66(1), 103.
- Tucker, R. S. (2010). Broadband facts, fiction and urban myths. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 60(3), 43.1–43.15. https://doi.org/10.2104/tja10043
- U.S. Government Printing Office [GPO]. (2009). American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public law 111-5, U.S. Congressional record) (Vol. 155). U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Watson, B. (2013, April 12). It’s official: Google Fiber is coming to Austin. The Austin Chronicle. https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2013-04-12/its-official-google-fiber-is-coming-to-austin/
- Welch, C. (2019, February 7). Google Fiber is leaving Louisville in humiliating setback. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/7/18215743/google-fiber-leaving-louisville-service-ending
- Whitacre, B., & Rhinesmith, C. (2016). Broadband un-adopters. Telecommunications Policy, 40(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.008
- Whitacre, B. E., Alam, M. R., & Lobo, B. J. (2018). Econometric error nullifies finding of the impact of broadband speed on county-level employment. Information Economics and Policy, 44, 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2018.05.001
- Wicks, B. E., & Crompton, J. L. (1989). Allocating services for parks and recreation: A model for implementing equity concepts in Austin, Texas. Journal of Urban Affairs, 11(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1989.tb00186.x
- Williams, D. (2017, February 10). Even taxpayer subsidies can’t save Google Fiber. The Hill. http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/318983-even-taxpayer-subsidies-cant-save-google-fiber
- Wilson, K. (2017). Does public competition crowd out private investment? Evidence from municipal provision of internet access (Evidence from Municipal Provision of Internet Access (June 16, 2017) .NET Institute Working Paper, (16-16)). NET Institute.
- Wohlsen, M. (2012, September 7). Google Fiber splits along Kansas City’s digital divide. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2012/09/google-fiber-digital-divide/