Innovating urban governance through ‘Challenges’

References

• Alizadeh, T. (2017). An investigation of IBM’s smarter cites Challenge: What do participating cities want? Cities, 63, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo, H., & Wachsmuth, D. (2020). Why does everyone think cities can save the planet? Urban Studies, 57(11), 2201–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2022). The wicked city: Genealogies of interdisciplinary hubris in urban thought. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(1), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co-design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg Philanthropies. (2015). City Hall innovation team playbook: The innovation delivery approach to develop and deliver bold innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2018). The new spirit of capitalism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Hartmann, C., Kronsell, A., Mai, L., Marvin, S., McCormick, K., van Steenbergen, F., & Voytenko Palgan, Y. (2016). Urban living labs: Governing urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaib, J. (2019). Public sector innovation projects: Beyond bureaucracy and market? In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 75–94). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., & Gruendel, A. (2022). Design in government: City planning, space-making, and urban politics. Political Geography, 97(102644), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102644
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, R., & Joss, S. (2020). Urban transformation through national innovation competitions: Lessons from the UK’s future city demonstrator initiative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 44(10), 1432–1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1828903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, D. (2020). In pursuit of being smart? A critical analysis of India’s smart cities endeavor. Urban Geography, 41(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1646049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., & Ward, K. (2022). Post-great recession municipal budgeting and governance: A mixed methods analysis of budget stress and reform. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(4), 634–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211068051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C. (2012). On Challenge.gov, the public and I can solve problems together. IBM Centre for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Doblin. (2014). The craft of incentive prize design. Deloitte Consulitng LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021) Cities. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.intelligentcitieschallenge.eu/cities
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (2017). The experimental city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertting, N., Thörn, C., & Franzén, M. (2022). Normalizing urban entrepreneurialism through sly de-politicization: City centre development in Gothenburg and Stockholm. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D., Fred, M., Bailey, S., & Hall, P. (2019). Introduction. In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., & Kauranen, I. (2014). Competition-based innovation: The case of the X prize foundation. Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, L. (2007). Managing innovation prizes in government. IBM Centre For the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, L. (2012). Opportunities and Challenges in the use of innovation prizes as a government policy instrument. Minerva, 50(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9198-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., & Vesnić-Alujević, L. (2020). After the toolkit: Anticipatory logics and the future of government. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1763545
   Google Scholar
• Lauermann, J. (2018). Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516673240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LSE Cities. (2015). Innovation in Europe’s cities: A report by LSE cities on Bloomberg Philanthropies’ 2014 mayors Challenge. LSE Cities & Bloomberg Philanthropies.
   Google Scholar
• Maalsen, S. (2022). Hacking housing: Theorising housing from the minor. International Journal of Housing Policy, 23(1), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2022.2059846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., & Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., Langley, P., Painter, J., Lewis, S., & Vradis, A. (2023). Interrogating ‘urban social innovation’: Relationality and urban change in Berlin. Urban Geography, 44(2), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.2003586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., Baker, T., Sisson, A., Dowling, R., & Maalsen, S. (2022). Innovating urban governance: A research agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 46(6), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221127298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P., Dowling, R., & Chatterjee, P. (2021). Municipal statecraft for the smart city: Retooling the smart entrepreneurial city? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(7), 1730–1748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211027905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, J. T., & Phelps, N. A. (2019). The intrapreneurial state: Singapore’s emergence in the smart and sustainable urban solutions field. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(3), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1467787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, S. (2020). Leveraging Bogotá: Sustainable development, global philanthropy and the rise of urban solutionism. Urban Studies, 57(11), 2263–2281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018798555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Munck af Rosenschöld, J., & Wolf, S. A. (2017). Toward projectified environmental governance? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16674210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesta Challenges. (2019). Challenge prizes: A practice guide. Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Enhancing innovation capacity in city government.
   Google Scholar
• Perng, S. Y., Kitchin, R., & Mac Donncha, D. (2018). Hackathons, entrepreneurial life and the making of smart cities. Geoforum, 97, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perng, S. Y., & Maalsen, M. (2020). Civic infrastructure and the appropriation of the corporate smart city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1674629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Miao, J. T. (2020). Varieties of urban entrepreneurialism. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619890438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihlajamaa, M., & Merisalo, M. (2021). Organizing innovation contests for public procurement of innovation—A case study of smart city hackathons in Tampere, Finland. European Planning Studies, 29(10), 1906–1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1894097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta & Bloomberg Philanthropies.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, E. (2019). Challenge competitions in economic development: A discussion of NYC policy under the Bloomberg and De Blasio administrations. Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. (2009). Judgment in the architectural competition—Rules, policies and dilemmas. Nordisk Arkitekturforskning - Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 21(2–3), 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S., Löfgren, K., & Godenhjelm, S. (2013). Projectified politics—Temporary organisations in a public context: Introduction to the special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17(2), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strebel, I., & Silberberger, J. (2018). Two geographical logics in architectural competitions. In I. Strebel & J. Silberberger (Eds.), Architecture competition: Project design and the building process (pp. 31–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, S. S. K. (2022). Shared projects and symbiotic collaborations: Shenzhen and London in comparative conversation. Urban Studies, 59(8), 1694–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211048675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with the rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(6), 1168–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., Nowak, V., Southern, A., Davies, J., & Furmedge, P. (2020). Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1171–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19899698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjornbo, O., & Westley, F. R. (2012). Game changers: The big green Challenge and the role of Challenge grants in social innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.726007
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Experimentation or projectification of urban change? A critical appraisal and three steps forward. Urban Transformations, 3(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1
   Google Scholar
• Usher, O., Dyson, T., & Gorst, C. (2020). The great innovation Challenge: How Challenge prizes can kick-start the British economy. Nesta Challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Utopia & World Economic Forum. (n.d.). Urban innovation Challenge for emergent cities. Retrieved November 25, 2022 from https://urbanchallenge.co/
   Google Scholar
• van Winden, W., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges. Research Policy, 48(9), 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. B. (2011). Why prize? The surprising resurgence of prizes to stimulate innovation. Research-Technology Management, 54(6), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5406013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S., Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (2021). Wheeling out urban resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, marketization, and local practice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, A. (2015). IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City, 19(2–3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2015). Citizen-driven innovation: A guidebook for city mayors and administrations.
   Google Scholar