Creating an “in-between”: The post-migrant perspective and participatory urban development in Germany, a comparison between Berlin and Wiesbaden

References

• Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, E. (2018). Sozialraum Hochhaus: Nachbarschaft und Wohnalltag in Schweizer Großwohnbauten [Social space high-rise building: Neighborhood and everyday living in Swiss large residential buildings]. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 34(6), 959–980. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor*innen-Kollektiv INTERPART. (2021). Beteiligung interkulturell gestalten: Ein Lesebuch zu partizipativer Stadtentwicklung [Designing intercultural participation: A reader on participatory urban development]. jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, G., & Sunier, T. (Eds.). (1995). Post-migration ethnicity: De-essentializing cohesion, commitments and comparison. Het Spinhuis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. (2006). The participation trap: The limitations of participation for ethnic and racial groups. International Planning Studies, 11(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470600935008
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. (2012). Including the excluded? Changing the understandings of ethnicity in contemporary English planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(4), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.728005
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. (2022). Whose diversity? Race, space and the European city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2075269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burayidi, M. A. (Ed.). (2015). Cities and the politics of difference: Multiculturalism and diversity in urban planning. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castro Varela, M. D. M., & Mecheril, P. (2010). Grenze und Bewegung: Migrationswissenschaftliche Klärungen [Border and movement: Clarifications in migration studies]. In P. Mecheril, M. D. M. Castro Varela, İ. Dirim, A. Kalpaka, & C. Melter (Eds.), Migrationspädagogik (pp. 25–53). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, J. (2022). Wilhelmsburg is our home! Racialized residents on urban development and social mix planning in a Hamburg neighbourhood. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• City of Wiesbaden. (2016). Wiesbadener Leitlinien für Bürgerbeteiligung [Wiesbaden guidelines for citizen participation].
   Google Scholar
• Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the “de-migranticization” of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Bone, R. (2004). Milieumodelle und Milieuinstrumente in der Marktforschung [Milieu models and milieu instruments in market research]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Art. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, C., & Ulbricht, K. (2017). Gentrification hotspots and displacement in Berlin: A quantitative analysis. In I. Helbrecht (Ed.), Gentrification and resistance: Researching displacement processes and adaption strategies (pp. 9–35). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• El-Tayeb, F. (2011). European others: Queering ethnicity in postnational Europe. Difference incorporated. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, E. (2013). Community and democratic citizenship: A critique of the sinus study on immigrant milieus in Germany. German Politics and Society, 31(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2013.310208
   Google Scholar
• Espahangizi, K., Hess, S., Karakayalı, J., Kasparek, B., Pagano, S., Rodatz, M., & Tsianos, V. (2016). Rassismus in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft: Zur Einleitung [Racism in the post-migrant society: An introduction]. Movements Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 2(1), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, R. (1974). Die letzten fünfzig Jahre [The last fifty years]. In R. Faber (Ed.), Biebrich am Rhein: 874–1974: Chronik (pp. 143–178). Seyfried.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H., & Preston, V. (2014). Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleras, A., & Elliott, J. L. (2002). Engaging diversity: Multiculturalism in Canada. Nelson Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2011). An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Foroutan, N. (2019a). Die postmigrantische Gesellschaft: Ein Versprechen der pluralen Demokratie [The post-migrant society: A promise of plural democracy]. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Foroutan, N. (2019b). The post-migrant paradigm. In J.-J. Bock & S. Macdonald (Eds.), Refugees welcome? Difference and diversity in a changing Germany (pp. 142–167). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, A. (2019). The contradictions of participatory planning: Reflections on the role of politics in urban development in Niterói, Brazil. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(7), 910–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1569468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesecke, F. (2017). Aktivierung von beteiligungsschwachen Gruppen in der Stadt- und Quartiersentwicklung [Activating participation of weakly involved groups in urban and neighborhood development]. In H. Bauer, C. Büchner, & L. Hajasch (Eds.), Partizipation in der Bürgerkommune (pp. 117–138). Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, R., & Thomas, H. (2018). Race at the margins: A critical race theory perspective on race equality in UK planning. Environment & Planning C Politics & Space, 36(3), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417723168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haferland, E. (2018). Gentrifizierung - eine Frage des Lebensstils? Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Berliner Stadtteile Wedding und Moabit [Gentrification—A matter of lifestyle? An investigation using the example of the Berlin districts Wedding and Moabit]. Tectum Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. (2012). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning Theory, 11(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212440427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häußermann, H., Läpple, D., & Siebel, W. (2007). Stadtpolitik [Urban politics]. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003). “Agon”izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be “real”. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Hinger, S. (2016). Asylum in Germany: The making of the “crisis” and the role of civil society. Human Geography, 9(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277861600900208
   Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R., & Latham, A. (2020). Qualitative methods I: On current conventions in interview research. Progress in Human Geography, 44(2), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519856412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huning, S. (2020). From feminist critique to gender mainstreaming — and back? The case of German urban planning. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(7), 944–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1618796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huning, S., Droste, C., & Gliemann, K. (2021). Promoting interculture in participation in German urban planning: Fields of action for institutional change. Urban Planning, 6(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i2.3856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahre, S. (2021). Postmigrant spatial justice? The case of “Berlin develops new neighbourhoods” (BENN). Urban Planning, 6(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i2.3807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kast, A. (2006). Gesellschaftliche Teilhabe sichern: Partizipation von Migrantinnen und Migranten in der “Sozialen Stadt” Berlin [Ensuring social participation: Participation of migrants in the “socially integrative city” Berlin]. Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lanz, S. (2007). Berlin aufgemischt: abendländisch, multikulturell, kosmopolitisch? Die politische Konstruktion einer Einwanderungsstadt [Berlin stirred up: Occidental, multicultural, cosmopolitan? The political construction of an immigration city]. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, N., & Schreiber, V. (2015). Mothering urban space, governing migrant women: The construction of intersectional positions in area-based interventions in Berlin. Urban Geography, 36(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.961358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monno, V., & Khakee, A. (2012). Tokenism or political activism? Some reflections on participatory planning. International Planning Studies, 17(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.638181
   Google Scholar
• Office for Statistics and Urban Research Wiesbaden. (2021) . Stadtteilprofile Ortsbezirk Biebrich [District profiles of the Biebrich neighborhood]. City of Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Pilz, M., & Kirndörfer, E. (2021). “Tense encounters”: How migrantised women design and re-imagine urban everyday life. In A. M. Gaonkar, A. S. Ost Hansen, H. C. Post, & M. Schramm (Eds.), Postmigration: Art, culture, and politics in contemporary Europe (pp. 299–318). transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Kesten, J. (2018). The politicisation of diversity planning in a global city: Lessons from London. Urban Studies, 55(4), 891–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016674869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räuchle, C. (2021). Social encounter by experiment? Potentials and pitfalls of real-world labs for urban planning. Urban Planning, 6(1), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räuchle, C., & Nuissl, H. (2019). Migrantische Ökonomien zwischen Potentialorientierung und Differenzmarkierung. Konzeption und Erträge eines “prä-postmigrantischen” Forschungsgegenstands [Migrant economies between potential orientation and difference marking. Concept and yields of a “Pre-postmigrant” research subject]. Geographica Helvetica, 74(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-1-2019
   Google Scholar
• Rodatz, M. (2012). Produktive “Parallelgesellschaften”: Migration und Ordnung in der (neoliberalen) “Stadt der Vielfalt” [Productive “Parallel Societies”. Migration and order in the (neoliberal) “City of Diversity”]. Behemoth, 5(1), 70–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/behemoth.2012.006
   Google Scholar
• Römhild, R. (2015). Jenseits ethnischer Grenzen: Für eine postmigrantische Kultur- und Gesellschaftsforschung [Beyond ethnic boundaries: For a post-migrant culture and social research. In E. Yıldız & M. Hill (Eds.), Nach der Migration: Postmigrantische Perspektiven jenseits der Parallelgesellschaft (pp. 37–48). transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Römhild, R. (2017). Beyond the bounds of the ethnic: For postmigrant cultural and social research. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 9(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2017.1379850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römhild, R., & Schwanhäußer, A. (2018). The city as laboratory. In Yurdakul, G., Römhild, R., Schwanhäußer, A., Zur Nieden, B., Ajayi, F. M., Kneffel, C., Litfin, M., Hoang Tran, H. H. & A. Lakić (Eds.), Witnessing the transition: Moments in the long summer of migration (pp. 345–351). BIM.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., Stelzer, F., Caniglia, G., Bergmann, M., Wanner, M., Singer-Brodowski, M., Loorbach, D., Olsson, P., Baedeker, C., & Lang, D. J. (2018). Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16
   Google Scholar
• Schmiz, A., & Kitzmann, R. (2017). Negotiating an Asiatown in Berlin: Ethnic diversity in urban planning. Cities, 70, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, O. (2018). “Quartiersentwicklung für alle“? Von Integrationsdiskursen und Quartierspolitiken [“Neighborhood development for all?” On integration discourses and neighborhood policies]. In F. Gesemann & R. Roth (Eds.), Handbuch Lokale Integrationspolitik (pp. 373–391). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Selle, K. (2013). Über Bürgerbeteiligung hinaus: Stadtentwicklung als Gemeinschaftsaufgabe? Analysen und Konzepte [Beyond citizen participation: Urban development as a community task? Analyses and concepts]. Rohn.
   Google Scholar
• SenSW—Senate Department for Urban Development and Housing. (2021) . Leitlinien für Beteiligung von Bürgerinnen und Bürgern an Projekten und Prozessen der räumlichen Stadtentwicklung: Umsetzungskonzept [Guidelines for the participation of citizens in projects and processes of spatial urban development: Implementation concept]. City of Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sironi, A., Bauloz, C., & Emmanuel, M. (2019). Glossary on migration (International Migration Law No. 34). International Organization for Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Office Berlin-Brandenburg. (2020). Einwohnerregister [Population register].
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. (2017). Postmigrant theatre: The Ballhaus Naunynstraße takes on sexual nationalism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 9(2), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2017.1370358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struck, W. ‑H. (1974). Vom Residenzort und Bauerndorf zur Industriestadt [From a residence and farming village to an industrial city]. In R. Faber (Ed.), Biebrich am Rhein: 874–1974: Chronik (pp. 116–142). Seyfried.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., Rossi, U., & van Houtum, H. (2005). Reinventing multiculturalism: Urban citizenship and the negotiation of ethnic diversity in Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3), 622–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vhw - Federal Association for Housing and Urban Development. (2021). Milieuwissen für die Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung.
   Google Scholar
• Wanner, M., Hilger, A., Westerkowski, J., Rose, M., Stelzer, F., & Schäpke, N. (2018). Towards a cyclical concept of real-world laboratories. DisP - the Planning Review, 54(2), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiest, K. (2020). Ordinary places of postmigrant societies: Dealing with difference in West and East German neighbourhoods. Urban Planning, 5(3), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.2960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will, A. ‑K. (2019). The German statistical category “migration background”: Historical roots, revisions and shortcomings. Ethnicities, 19(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796819833437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A., & Velayutham, S. (2009). Everyday multiculturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, E. (2015). Postmigrantische Perspektiven: Aufbruch in eine neue Geschichtlichkeit [Postmigrant perspectives: Departure into a new historicity]. In E. Yıldız & M. Hill (Eds.), Nach der Migration: Postmigrantische Perspektiven jenseits der Parallelgesellschaft (pp. 19–48). transcript.
   Google Scholar