0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The forms of neighborhood cohesion: From social contact to symbolic belonging in neoliberal Santiago de Chile

References

  • Aalbers, M. (2012). Subprime cities: The political economy of mortgage markets. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Anderson, B. (2020). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Routledge.
  • Araos, C., & Siles, C. (2021). “Juntos pero no Revueltos”: Family residential dependence and care vulnerabilities along the life course. Advances in Life Course Research, 49, 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2021.100404
  • Authier, J. Y., & Cayouette-Remblière, J. (2021). Neighbourliness in France: An enduring—and selective—practice. Population Societies, 589(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.589.0001
  • Bailey, N., Kearns, A., & Livingston, M. (2012). Place attachment in deprived neighbourhoods: The impacts of population turnover and social mix. Housing Studies, 27(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.632620
  • Blokland, T. (2017). Community as urban practice. Polity Press.
  • Blokland, T., & Nast, J. (2014). From public familiarity to comfort zone: The relevance of absent ties for belonging in Berlin’s mixed neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12126
  • Blokland, T., & Schultze, H. (2017). Belonging, conviviality or public familiarity? Making sense of urbanity in rapidly transforming neighborhoods through the lens of Berlin and Rotterdam. In M. Smagacz-Poziemska, K. Frysztacki, & A. Bukowski (Eds.), Re-imagining the city: Municipality and urbanity today from a sociological perspective (pp. 243–264). Jagiellonian University Press.
  • Blokland, T., Vief, R., Krüger, D., & Schultze, H. (2023). Roots and routes in neighbourhoods. Length of residence, belonging and public familiarity in Berlin, Germany. Urban Studies, 60(10), 1949–1967. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221136960
  • Borsdorf, A., Hidalgo, R., & Sánchez, R. (2007). A new model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities, 24(5), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.002
  • Carrasco, J. A., Miller, E. J., & Wellman, B. (2008). How far and with whom do people socialize? Empirical evidence about distance between social network members. Transportation Research Record, 2076(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.3141/2076-13
  • Casakin, H., Hernández, B., & Ruiz, C. (2015). Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size. Cities, 42, 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.07.007
  • Castells, M. (1973). Movimientos de Pobladores y lucha de clases en Chile [Movements of settlers and class struggle in Chile]. EURE, 3(7), 9–35.
  • Castillo, J. C., Espinoza, V., & Barozet, E. (2022). Cohesión social en Chile en tiempos de cambio: indicadores, perfiles y factores asociados [Social cohesion in Chile in times of change: indicators, profiles and associated factors]. Documentos de Proyectos, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (COES).
  • Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
  • Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification: A political challenge. In K. Paton (Ed.), Gentrification in a global context: The new urban colonialism (pp. 261–269). Routledge.
  • Contreras, Y. (2016). Nuevos habitantes del centro de Santiago [New residents of downtown Santiago]. Editorial Universitaria.
  • Contreras, Y., Ala-Louko, V., & Labbé, G. (2015). Acceso exclusionario y racista a la vivienda formal e informal en las áreas centrales de Santiago e Iquique [exclusionary and racist access to formal and informal housing in the central areas of Santiago and Iquique] Polis. Revista Latinoamericana, 42, 1–22. http://journals.openedition.org/polis/11266
  • Delclòs-Alió, X., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2018). Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: Mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation. Land Use Policy, 75, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.026
  • De Mattos, C. (2008). Globalización, negocios inmobiliarios y mercantilización del desarrollo urbano [Globalization, real estate business and the commoditization of urban development]. In P. Pereira & R. Hidalgo (Eds.), Producción inmobiliaria y reestructuración metropolitana en América Latina (pp. 35–62). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • De Mattos, C., Fuentes, L., & Link, F. (2014). Tendencias recientes del crecimiento metropolitano en Santiago de Chile: ¿Hacia una nueva geografía urbana? [Recent Trends in Metropolitan Growth in Santiago de Chile: Towards a New Urban Geography?]. Revista INVI, 29(81), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582014000200006
  • De Ramón, A. (1990). La población informal. Poblamiento de la periferia de Santiago de Chile. 1920–1970” [The informal population. Population of the periphery of Santiago de Chile. 1920–1970]. Revista EURE, 50(16), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.7764/1049
  • Dovey, K., & Symons, F. (2014). Density without intensity and what to do about it: Reassembling public/private interfaces in Melbourne’s Southbank hinterland. Australian Planner, 51(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2013.776975
  • Eizaguirre, S., Pradel, M., Terrones, A., Martinez-Celorrio, X., & García, M. (2012). Multilevel governance and social cohesion: Bringing back conflict in citizenship practices. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1999–2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444890
  • Felder, M. (2020). Strong, weak and invisible ties: A relational perspective on urban coexistence. Sociology, 54(4), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519895938
  • Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press.
  • Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087081
  • Friedkin, N. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
  • Fuentes, L., Ramirez, M. I., Rodríguez, S., & Señoret, A. (2023). Socio-spatial differentiation in a Latin American metropolis: Urban structure, residential mobility, and real estate in the high-income cone of Santiago de Chile. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2116087
  • Fuentes, L., Ramírez, M., Rodríguez, S., Greene, M., Berríos, E., Flores, M., Henríquez, C., Link, F., Lunecke, A., Navarrete, P., Ruiz-Tagle, J., Salazar, G., Rehner, J., Señoret, A., Truffello, R., & Valenzuela, N. (2021a). Percepciones sobre el desarrollo urbano sustentable en áreas metropolitanas de Chile. Síntesis de Investigación Nº12 [Perceptions of sustainable urban development in metropolitan areas of Chile. Research Summary No. 12]. Sustainable Urban Development Center (CEDEUS).
  • Fuentes, L., Ramírez, M., Rodríguez, S., Greene, M., Berríos, E., Flores, M., Henríquez, C., Link, F., Lunecke, A., Navarrete, P., Ruiz-Tagle, J., Salazar, G., Rehner, J., Señoret, A., Truffello, R., & Valenzuela, N. (2021b). Propuesta metodologíca de comprensión de la ciudad a través de clúster para la política pública. Documento para Política Pública Nº26 [Methodological proposal for understanding the city using cluster analysis for public policy. Public Policy Document No. 26]. Sustainable Urban Development Center (CEDEUS). https://doi.org/10.7764/cedeus.dpp.26
  • Fuentes, L., & Rodríguez, S. (2020). El acceso de los jóvenes al trabajo y la ciudad. Miradas territoriales de la desigualdad y la segregación en Santiago de Chile [Young people’s access to work and the city. Territorial perspectives of inequality and segregation in Santiago, Chile]. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 52(204), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.3723/0/CyTET.2020.204.10
  • Garreton, M. (2017). City profile: Actually existing neoliberalism in Greater Santiago. Cities, 65, 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.005
  • Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
  • Guest, A. M., & Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922184301
  • Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
  • Henning, C., & Lieberg, M. (1996). Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739608730394
  • Hidalgo, R. (2004). La vivienda social en Santiago de Chile en la segunda mitad del siglo XX: Actores relevantes y tendencias espaciales [Social housing in Santiago de Chile in the second half of the 20th century: Relevant actors and spatial trends]. In C. De Mattos, M. E. Ducci, A. Rodríguez, & G. Yáñez (Eds.), Santiago en la globalización. ¿Una nueva ciudad? (pp. 219–241). EURE libros.
  • Hidalgo, R., Borsdorf, A., & Plaza, F. (2009). Parcelas de agrado alrededor de Santiago y Valparaíso: ¿Migración por amenidad a la chilena? [Parcelas de agrado around Santiago and Valparaíso: Chilean-style amenity migration?]. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 44(44), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022009000300005
  • Hidalgo, R., & Zunino, H. M. (2011). La urbanización de las áreas periféricas en Santiago y Valparaíso: el papel de las relaciones de poder en el dibujo de la geografía socioresidencial [The urbanization of peripheral areas in Santiago and Valparaíso: The role of power relations in the drawing of socio-residential geography]. EURE, 37(111), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612011000200004
  • Inzulza-Contardo, J. (2012). ‘Latino gentrification’?: Focusing on physical and socioeconomic patterns of change in Latin American inner cities. Urban Studies, 49(10), 2085–2107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011423425
  • Jacobs, J. (2011). The death and life of Great American cities. Vintage Books. (Original work published 1961)
  • Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Social cohesion as a real-life phenomenon: Assessing the explanatory power of the universalist and particularist perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9604-9
  • Link, F., Señoret, A., & Figueroa, C. (2022). Del barrio al conjunto: Espacio público y sociabilidad en la vivienda social de Santiago [From the neighborhood to the social complex: Public space and sociability in social housing in Santiago]. Revista INVI, 37(106), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-8358.2022.67125
  • Link, F., Señoret, A., Fuentes, L., & Rodríguez, S. (2022). Vitalidad urbana y sociabilidad barrial: complejidades de una metrópolis latinoamericana [Urban vitality and neighborhood sociability: complexities of a Latin American metropolis]. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 54(212), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.3723/0/CyTET.2022.212.9
  • Link, F., Señoret, A., & Matus, C. (2023). Barrios verticales en Santiago de Chile: Nuevas formas de sociabilidad vecinal y familiaridad pública [Vertical neighborhoods in Santiago de Chile: New forms of neighborhood sociability and public familiarity]. Revista de urbanismo, 48(48), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-5051.2023.68121
  • Link, F., Señoret, A., & Valenzuela, F. (2022). From community to public familiarity: Neighborhood, sociability, and belonging in the neoliberal city. Urban Affairs Review, 58(4), 960–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211021512
  • Link, F., & Valenzuela, F. (2014). Sociabilidad en contextos de fragmentación urbana. Inclusión y exclusión metropolitana en Santiago de Chile [Sociability in contexts of urban fragmentation. Metropolitan inclusion and exclusion in Santiago, Chile]. Proyección, 17(8), 149–168.
  • López-Morales, E. J., Gasic, I. R., & Meza, D. A. (2012). Urbanismo pro-empresarial en Chile: políticas y planificación de la producción residencial en altura en el pericentro del Gran Santiago [Pro-Business Urbanism in Chile: Policies and Planning for High-Rise Residential Production in the Pericenter of Greater Santiago]. Revista INVI, 27(76), 75–114. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582012000300003
  • López-Morales, E. J., Gasic, I. R., & Meza, D. A. (2014). Captura desigual de renta de suelo y desplazamiento exclusionario. Indicadores generales del proceso de gentrificación en Santiago de Chile, 2000–2012 [Unequal land rent capture and exclusionary displacement. General indicators of the gentrification process in Santiago de Chile, 2000–2012]. Cadernos Metrópole, 16, 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2014-3212
  • Lynch, K. (2013). The image of the city. MIT. (Original work published 1960)
  • Manturuk, K., Lindblad, M., & Quercia, R. (2010). Friends and neighbors: Homeownership and social capital among low‐to moderate‐income families. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00494.x
  • Márquez, F. (2007). Imaginarios urbanos en el Gran Santiago: huellas de una metamorfosis [Urban imaginaries in Greater Santiago: traces of a metamorphosis]. Revista EURE, 33(99), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612007000200007
  • Mata, F., & Pendakur, R. (2014). Social capital, diversity and giving or receiving help among neighbours. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0419-3
  • Méndez, M. L., & Gayo, M. (2018). Upper middle class social reproduction: Wealth, schooling, and residential choice in Chile. Springer.
  • Méndez, M. L., Otero, G., Link, F., López Morales, E., & Gayo, M. (2021). Neighbourhood cohesion as a form of privilege. Urban Studies, 58(8), 1691–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020914549
  • Ministry of Transportation and Telecommunications. (2012). Origin destiny survey. Metropolitan area of Santiago. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from http://www.sectra.gob.cl/biblioteca/detalle1.asp?mfn=3253
  • Mollenhorst, G. (2015). Neighbour relations in the Netherlands: New developments. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 106(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12138
  • Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
  • Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800105
  • Mouratidis, K., & Poortinga, W. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103951
  • National Institute of Statistics of Chile. (2017). Census 2017 results. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from http://www.censo2017.cl
  • Netto, V. M., Saboya, R., & Vargas, J. C. (2022). Does architecture matter to urban vitality? Buildings and the social life of streets and neighbourhoods. Built Environment, 48(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.48.3.317
  • Netto, V. M., Soares, M., & Paschoalino, M. (2015). Segregated networks in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(6), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12346
  • Orellana, A., Vicuña, M., Link, F., Perrozzi, A., Marshall, C., Truffello, R., & Señoret, A. (2022). Verticalización y configuración socioespacial de Santiago. Verticalización y configuración socioespacial de Santiago [Verticalization and socio-spatial configuration of Santiago]. Revista AUS, 31(31), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.4206/aus.2022.n31-05
  • Otero, G., Méndez, M. L., & Link, F. (2022). Symbolic domination in the neoliberal city: Space, class, and residential stigma. Urban Geography, 43(4), 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1887632
  • Otero, G., Ramond, Q., Méndez, M. L., Carranza, R., Link, F., & Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2024). The damages of stigma, the benefits of prestige: Examining the consequences of perceived residential reputations on neighbourhood attachment. Urban Studies, 61(3), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231186141
  • Otero, G., Volker, B., & Rozer, J. (2021). Open but segregated? Class divisions and the network structure of social capital in Chile. Social Forces, 100(2), 649–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab005
  • Pastak, I., & Kährik, A. (2021). Symbolic displacement revisited: Place‐making narratives in gentrifying neighbourhoods of Tallinn. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(5), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13054
  • Peck, J. (2012). Neoliberalismo y crisis actual [Neoliberalism and the current crisis]. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, 12(19), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.14409/da.v1i19.1284
  • Pumarino, N. (2014). Edificio residencial: un Gigante Egoísta [Residential Building: a Selfish Giant]. Revista AUS, 15(15), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.4206/aus.2014.n15-09
  • Rodríguez, A., & Sugranyes, A. (2004). El problema de vivienda de los “con techo [The Housing Problem of the “Con Techo.”]. Revista EURE, 30(91), 53–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612004009100004
  • Rodríguez, A., & Sugranyes, A. (2005). Los con techo. Un desafío para la política de vivienda social Santiago de Chile [Those with roofs. A challenge for social housing policy Santiago, Chile]. Ediciones SUR.
  • Rojas Symmes, L. (2017). Ciudad Vertical: La “Nueva Forma” de la Precariedad Habitacional. Comuna de Estación Central, Santiago de Chile [Vertical City: The “New Form” of Housing Precariousness. Commune of Estación Central, Santiago de Chile]. Revista, 180(39), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32995/rev180.Num-39.(2017).art-365
  • Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2016). La persistencia de la segregación y la desigualdad en barrios socialmente diversos: un estudio de caso en La Florida, Santiago [The persistence of segregation and inequality in socially diverse neighborhoods: a case study in La Florida, Santiago]. Revista EURE, 42(125), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612016000100004
  • Ruiz-Tagle, J., Alvarez, M., & Labbé, G. (2023). Urban marginality and institutional effects: Disinvestment, inefficacy, and stigmatization in Santiago de Chile. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2150198
  • Sabatini, F., Cáceres, G., & Cerda, J. (2001). Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las tres últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción [Residential segregation in Chile’s main cities: Trends over the last three decades and possible courses of action]. Revista EURE, 27(82), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612001008200002
  • Sabatini, F., & Salcedo, R. (2007). Gated communities and the poor in Santiago, Chile: Functional and symbolic integration in a context of aggressive capitalist colonization of lower‐class areas. Housing Policy Debate, 18(3), 577–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2007.9521612
  • Sabatini, F., Wormald, G., & Rasse, A. (2013). Segregación de la vivienda social: Ocho conjuntos en Santiago, Concepción y Talca. Santiago [Segregation of social housing: Eight housing developments in Santiago, Concepción and Talca. Santiago]. Colección Estudios Urbanos UC.
  • Salcedo, R., & Torres, A. (2004). Gated communities in Santiago: Wall or frontier? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00501.x
  • Sarmiento, J. P., & Herard, D. (2015). Sistematización in urban disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management, 24(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2014-0201
  • Schiefer, D., & Van der Noll, J. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
  • Señoret, A., & Link, F. (2019). Densidad urbana, forma y sociabilidad en la ciudad neoliberal: el caso del barrio Santa Isabel en Santiago de Chile [Urban density, form and sociability in the neoliberal city: The case of Santa Isabel Neighborhood]. Revista de urbanismo, 41. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-5051.2019.52862
  • Stern, C. (2020). Una ciudadela para clases medias chilenas: subjetividades de vivienda y vida cotidiana Villa Olímpica, Ñuñoa (1960–1980) [A citadel for the Chilean middle classes: subjectivities of housing and daily life Villa Olímpica, Ñuñoa (1960–1980)]. Anuario Centro de Estudios Económicos de la Empresa y el Desarrollo, (13), 111–143.
  • Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounters. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
  • Van den Berg, P., Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2015). A multilevel analysis of factors influencing local social interaction. Transportation, 42(5), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9648-4
  • Van Marissing, E., Bolt, G., & Van Kempen, R. (2006). Urban governance and social cohesion: Effects of urban restructuring policies in two Dutch cities. Cities, 23(4), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.11.001
  • Vergara-Perucich, J. F. (2021). Precios y financierización: evidencia empírica en mercado de la vivienda del Gran Santiago [Prices and financialization: empirical evidence on the housing market of Greater Santiago]. Revista INVI, 36(103), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582021000300137
  • Vicuña, M. (2015). Diez Umbrales de Densidad Para Construir Una Hipótesis Sobre Las Urbanidades Del Gran Santiago Contemporáneo” [Ten density thresholds for constructing a hypothesis on the urbanities of contemporary greater santiago]. VII Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo, Barcelona-Montevideo, Departament d’Urbanisme i Ordenació del Territori (DUOT) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
  • Viry, G. (2012). Residential mobility and the spatial dispersion of personal networks: Effects on social support. Social Networks, 34(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.07.003
  • Völker, B., Flap, H., & Lindenberg, S. (2007). When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl022
  • Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods, and communities: Approaches to the study of the community question. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747901400305
  • Wormald, G., Flores, C., Sabatini, F., Trebilcock, M. P., & Rasse, A. (2012). Cultura de cohesión e integración en las ciudades chilenas [Culture of cohesion and integration in Chilean cities]. Revista INVI, 27(76), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582012000300004

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.