A comparison of the uniformity of an elevated CO₂ environment in three different types of open‐top chambers

D. R. Hileman Department of Biology, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088

P. P. Ghosh Department of Plant and Soil Science, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088

N. C. Bhattacharya Department of Plant and Soil Science, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088; USDA‐ARS, Western Cotton Research Laboratory, 4135 E. Broadway, Phoenix, AZ, 85040

P. K. Biswas Department of Plant and Soil Science, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088

L H. Allen Jr. USDA‐ARS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611

G. Peresta USDA‐ARS, U.S. Water Conservation Lab, Phoenix, AZ, 85040; Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, P.O. Box 28, Edgewater, MD, 21037

B. A. Kimball USDA‐ARS, U.S. Water Conservation Lab, Phoenix, AZ, 85040

show all

References

Heagle , AS , Body , DE and Heck , WW . 1973 . An open top field chamber to assess the impact of air pollution on plants . J Environ Qual , 2 : 365 – 368 .
Google Scholar
Nakayama , FS and Kimball , BA . 1988 . Soil carbon dioxide distribution and flux within the open‐top chamber . Agron J , 80 : 394 – 398 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Phene , CJ , Baker , DN , Lambert , JR , Parsons , JE and McKinion , JM . 1978 . SPAR‐a soil‐plant‐atmosphere research system . Trans ASAE , 21 : 924 – 930 .
Google Scholar
Rogers , HH , Bingham , GE , Cure , JD , Smith , JM and Surano , KA . 1983a . Responses of selected plant species to elevated carbon dioxide in the field . J Environ Qual , 12 : 569 – 574 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Rogers , HH , Heck , WW and Heagle , AS . 1983b . A field technique for the study of plant responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations . J Air Pollut Control Assoc , 33 : 42 – 44 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Rogers , HH , Cure , JD , Thomas , JF and Smith , JM . 1984 . Influence of elevated CO2on growth of soybean plants . Crop Sci , 24 : 361 – 366 .
Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

A comparison of the uniformity of an elevated CO₂ environment in three different types of open‐top chambers

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

A comparison of the uniformity of an elevated CO2 environment in three different types of open‐top chambers

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

A comparison of the uniformity of an elevated CO₂ environment in three different types of open‐top chambers