References
- Andrews, D.A., J.Bonta, and J.S.Wormith. 2011. “The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention?” Criminal Justice and Behavior38 (7): 735–755.
- Bonta, J., et al.2008. “Exploring the black box of community supervision.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation47 (3): 248–270.
- Bonta, J.et al.2010. The strategic training initiative in community supervision: risk-need-responsivity in the real world, Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
- Bourgon, G., L.Gutierrez, and J.Ashton. 2011. “The evolution of community supervision practice: the transformation from case manager to change agent.” Irish Probation Journal, 8: 28–48.
- Carlson, E.W., and E.C.Parks. 1979. Critical issues in adult probation. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
- Clear, T.R., and E.J.Latessa. 1993. “Probation officer roles in intensive supervision: surveillance versus treatment.” Justice Quarterly10: 441–462.
- Eaglin, J.B.1997. et al.RPI profiles: descriptive information about offenders grouped by their RPI scores, Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
- Ferguson, L.M., and J.S.Wormith. 2012. “A meta-analysis of Moral Reconation Therapy.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology20 (10): 1–31.
- Klockars, C.B.1972. “A theory of probation supervision.” Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science63: 550–557.
- Lombard, P., L.Hooper, and D.Rauma. 2001. Risk Prediction Index: frequently asked questions. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
- Lowenkamp, C.T., M.Alexander, and C.R.Robinson. 2013. “Using 20 minutes wisely: Community supervision officers as agents of change.” In Offender reentry: 21st century issues, edited by J.Smykla, and M.Crow. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
- Lowenkamp, C.T., A.M. Holsinger, C.R. Robinson, and F.T. Cullen. Dec 2012., When a person isn't a data point: making evidence-based practices work. Federal Probation.
- Martin, S.S., et al.2011. “The long and winding road to desistance from crime for drug-involved offenders: the long-term influence of TC treatment on re-arrest.” Journal of Drug Issues41 (2): 179–196.
- Ohlin, L.E., H.Piven, and M.D.Pappenfort. 1956. “Major dilemmas of the social worker in probation and parole.” National Probation and Parole Association Journal2: 21–25.
- Paparozzi, M., and C.T.Lowenkamp. 2000. “To be or not to be – a profession – that is the question for corrections.” Corrections Management Quarterly4 (2): 9–16.
- Robinson, C.R., et al.2012. “A random study of Staff Training Aimed at Reducing Rearrest (STARR): using core correctional practices in probation interactions.” Journal of Crime & Justice35 (2): 167–188.
- Taxman, F.2008. “To be or not to be: community supervision déjà vu.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation47 (3): 250–260.
- Trotter, C.1996. “The impact of different supervision practices in community supervision: cause for optimism.” The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology29 (1): 29–46.
- Wallace, J. A.1974. “Probation administration.” In Handbook of criminology, edited by D.Glaser, 949–969. New York: Rand McNally.