184
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CONTROVERSIES IN PATIENT MANAGEMENT

Should Continuous Infusion 5-Fluorouracil Become the Standard of Care in the USA as It Is in Europe?

, M.D. & , M.D.
Pages 50-55 | Published online: 11 Jun 2009

REFERENCES

  • The Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. J. Clin. Oncol. 1992; 10: 896–903, [CSA]
  • The Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22: 3766–3755, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Hansen R. M., Quebbeman E., Anderson T. 5-fluorouracil by protracted venous infusion: a review of current progress. Oncology 1989; 46: 245–250, [CSA]
  • Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998; 6: 3537–3541, [CSA]
  • Pinedo H. M., Peters G. F. Fluorouracil: biochemistry and pharmacology. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998; 6: 1653–1664, [CSA]
  • Mandel H. G. The target cell determinants of the antitumor actions of 5-FU: does FU incorporation into RNA play a role. Cancer. Treat. Rep. 1981; 65(suppl 3)63–71, [CSA]
  • Danenberg P. V. Thymidilate synthase-a target enzyme in cancer chemotherapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1977; 473: 73–92, [CSA]
  • Danenberg P. V., Heidelberger C., Mulkins M. A., et al. The incorporation of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine into DNA of mammalian tumor cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1981; 102: 654–658, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Sobrero A. F., Aschele C., Bertino J. R. Fluorouracil in colorectal cancer—a tale of two drugs: implications for biochemical modulation. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997; 15: 368–381, [CSA]
  • Matsusaka S., Yamasaki H., Kitayama Y., et al. Differential effects of two fluorouracil administration regimens for colorectal cancer. Oncology Reports 2003; 10: 109–113, [CSA]
  • Calabro-Jones P., Byfield J, Ward J., et al. Time-dose relationships for 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity against epithelial cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Research 1982; 42: 4413–4420, [CSA]
  • Fraile R., Baker L., Buroker T., et al. Pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil administered orally, by rapid intravenous and by slow infusion. Cancer Research 1980; 40: 2223–2228, [CSA]
  • Hansen R. 5-Fluorouracil by protracted venous infusion: a review of recent clinical studies. Cancer Investigation 1991; 9: 647–652, [CSA]
  • Rustum Y. Fluoropyrimidines in Cancer Therapy. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 2003
  • Rich T., Shepard R., Mosley S. Four decades of continuing innovation with fluorouracil: current and future approaches to fluorouracil chemoradiation therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22: 2214–2232, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Lokich J., Bothe A., Fine N., et al. Phase I study of protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 1981; 48: 2565–2568, [CSA]
  • De Gramont A., Bosset J. F., Milan C., et al. Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997; 15: 808–815, [CSA]
  • Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998; 16: 301–308, [CSA]
  • Rougier P., Paillot B., Laplanche A., et al. End results of a multicenter randomized trial comparing 5-FU in continuous systemic infusion to bolus administration in measurable metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 1992; 11: 465, (Abstr)[CSA]
  • Hansen R. M., Ryan L., Anderson T., et al. Phase III study of bolus versus infusion fluorouracil with or without cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 1996; 88: 668–674, [CSA]
  • Lokich J. J., Ahlgren J. D., Gullo J J., et al. A prospective randomized comparison of continuous infusion fluorouracil with a conventional bolus schedule in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a mid Atlantic Oncology Program study. J. Clin. Oncol. 1989; 7: 425–432, [CSA]
  • Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998; 16: 3537–3541, [CSA]
  • O'Dwyer P., Manola J., Valone F., et al. Fluorouracil modulation in colorectal cancer: lack of improvement with N-Phosphoacetyl-l-aspartic acid or oral leucovorin or interferon, but enhanced therapeutic index with weekly 24-hour infusion schedule—An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 19: 2413–2421, [CSA]
  • Kohne C.-H., Wils J., Lorenz M., et al. Randomized phase III study of high dose fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion with or without leucovorin versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: European Organization of Research and treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40952. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003; 21: 3721–3728, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Wolmark N., Rockette H., Fisher B., et al. The benefit of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary colon cancer: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-03. J. Clin. Oncol. 1993; 11: 1879–1887, [CSA]
  • Wolmark N., Rockette H., Mamounas E. P., et al. Clinical trials to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisol, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisol in patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol C-04. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999; 17: 3553–3559, [CSA]
  • Saini A., Norman A. R., Cunnigham D., et al. Twelve weeks of protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) is as effective as 6 months of bolus 5-FU and folinic acid as adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer 2003; 66: 11859–1865, [CSA]
  • Vietti T., Eggerding F., Valeriote F. Combined effect of x-radiation and 5-fluorouracil on survival of transplanted leukemia cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1971; 47: 865–870, [CSA]
  • Smalley S., Kimler B., Evans R., et al. Heterogeneity of 5-Fluorouracil radiosensitivity modulation in cultured mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 1992; 24: 519–525, [CSA]
  • Byfield J. E., Calabro-Jones P., Klisak I., et al. Pharmacologic requirements for obtaining sensitization of human tumor cells in vitro to combine 5-Fluorouracil for ftorafur and X rays. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol Biol. Phys. 1982; 8: 1923–1933, [CSA]
  • O'Connell M. J., Martenson J. A., Wieand H. S., et al. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 331: 502–507, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Smalley S. R., Benedetti J., Williamson S., et al. Intergroup 0144-phase III trial of 5-FU based chemotherapy regimens plus radiotherapy (XRT) in postoperative adjuvant rectal cancer. Bolus 5-FU vs prolonged venous infusion (PVI) before and after XRT + PVI vs bolus 5-FU + leucovorin + levamisol (LEV) before and after XRT + bolus 5-FU + LV. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2003; 22, (Abst 1006)[CSA]
  • Leichman C. G., Benedetti J., Hochster H., et al. Phase III trial of protracted infusion (PI) vs intermittent high-dose infusion (HDI) 5-fluorouracil in patients with disseminated colorectal cancer. A Southwest Oncology group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2001, (Abst 497)[CSA]
  • Goldberg R., Sargent D., Morton R., et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22: 2084–2091, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Tournigand C., Andre T., Achille E., et al. FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer. A randomized GERCOR study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22: 229–237, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Benson A. B., Goldberg R. M. Optimal use of the combination of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. Seminars in Oncology 2003; 30: 68–77, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Hochster H. S., Welles L., Hart L., et al. Bevacizumab with oxaliplatin based chemotherapy in the first line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the randomized “TREE-2” trial. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. GI Symp. 2005, (Abst. 241)[CSA]
  • Hahn R. G., Moertel C. G., Schutt A. J., et al. A double-blind comparison of intensive course 5-fluorouracil by oral vs. intravenous route in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1975; 35: 1031–1035, [CSA]
  • Baker S. D., Khor S. P., Adjei A. A., et al. Pharmacokinetic, oral availability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C8, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. J. Clin. Oncol. 1996; 14: 3085–3096, [CSA]
  • Sulkes A., Benner S. E., Canetta R. M. uracil-ftorafur: an oral fluoropyrimidine active in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998; 16: 3461–3470, [CSA]
  • Miwa M., Ura M., Nishida M., et al. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumors by enzymes concentrated in liver and cancer tissue. Eur. J. Cancer 1998; 34: 1274–1281, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Schuller J., Cassidy J., Dumont E., et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2000; 45: 291–297, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • Mayer R. Oral versus intravenous fluoropyrimidines for advanced colorectal cancer: by either route, it's all the same. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003; 19: 4093–4096, [CSA]
  • Cassidy J., Scheithauer W., McKendrick J., et al. Capecitabine vs bolus 5FU/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer (the X-ACT study) : efficacy results of a phase III trial. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 22, (Abst 3509)[CSA]
  • Hoff P. M., Ansari R., Batist G, et al. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 19: 2282–2292, [CSA]
  • Van Custem E., Twelved C., Cassidy J., et al. Oral Capecitabine compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regikmen) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 19: 4907–4106, [CSA]
  • Arkenau H., Kubicka S., Greil R., et al. Phase III trial of infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FUFOX) versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as first line treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACRC): results of an interim efficacy and safety analysis. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. GI. Symposium 2005, (Abst 226)[CSA]
  • Liu G., Franssen E., Fitch M., et al. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997; 15: 110–115, [CSA]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.