97
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reducing Costs of Breast Examination: Ultrasound Performance and Inter-Observer Variability of Expert Radiologists Versus Residents

, , , , , & show all
Pages 355-360 | Received 16 Jan 2016, Accepted 09 Jun 2016, Published online: 20 Jul 2016

References

  • Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM. Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: State of the art. Radiology 2013 Sep;268(3):642–659.
  • Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196(1):123–134.
  • Cho SH, Park SH. Mimickers of breast malignancy on breast sonography. J. Ultrasound. Med. 2013 Nov;32(11):2029–2036.
  • Masciadria N, Ferranti C. Benign breast lesions: Ultrasound. J Ultrasound 2011 Jun;14(2):55–65.
  • Elverici ME, Zengin B, Barca AN, Yilmaz PD, Alimli A, Araz L. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of sonographic BIRADS lexicon in the assessment of breast masses. Iran J. Radiol. 2013 Sep;10(3):122–127.
  • Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, et al. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy. Radiology 2009;253(3):641–651.
  • Pagani C, Coscia DR, Dellabianca C, Bonardi M, Alessi S, Calliada F. Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of breast lesions. J. Ultrasound 2011 Dec;14(4):182–187.
  • Plantade R. Interventional radiology: The corner-stone of breast management. Diagn. Intervent. Imaging 2013;94(6):575–591.
  • Leconte I, Fellah L. US and dense breasts: Where do we stand? J Radiol. 2008 Sep;89(9, Pt 2):1169–1179.
  • Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, et al. Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar;101(11):814–827.
  • ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Breast Ultrasound Examination Res. 11–2011. Amended 2014 (Res. 39). Available from http://www.acr.org/∼/media/52d58307e93e45898b09d4c4d407dd76.pdf
  • McNemar, Q. Note of the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12:153–157.
  • Newcombe RG. Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Statist Med. 1998;17:2635–2650.
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. In The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Freeman; 1995;724–743.
  • Bassett LW, Monsees BS, Smith RA, Wang L, Hooshi P, Farria DM, et al. Survey of radiology residents: Breast imaging training and attitudes. Radiology 2003 Jun;227(3):862–869. Epub May 1, 2003.
  • Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA, Onega TL, Buist DS, Sickles EA, et al. When radiologists perform best: The learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation. Radiology 2009 Dec;253(3):632–640.
  • Sickles EA, Philpotts LE, Parkinson BT, Monticciolo DL, Lvoff NM, Ikeda DM, et al. American College Of Radiology/Society of breast imaging curriculum for resident and fellow education in breast imaging. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2006 Nov;3(11):879–884.
  • Monticciolo DL, Rebner M, Appleton CM, Newell MS, Farria DM, Sickles EA, et al. The ACR/society of breast imaging resident and fellowship training curriculum for breast imaging, updated. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2013 Mar;10(3):207–210.
  • Golatta M, Baggs C, Schweitzer-Martin M, Domschke C, Schott S, Harcos A, et al. Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):889–95.
  • Brem RF, Tabár L, Duffy SW, Inciardi MF, Guingrich JA, Hashimoto BE, et al. Assessing Improvement in Detection of Breast Cancer with Three-dimensional Automated Breast US in Women with Dense Breast Tissue: The Somo Insight Study. Radiology 2015 Mar;274(3):663–73.
  • Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Parl JH, Lee KE, Kim JH. Automated breast ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: Inter-observer agreement on lesion detection and characterization. AJR 2011;197:747–754.
  • Xiao Y, Zhou Q, Chen Z. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening. Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):387–399. Epub Jan 22, 2015.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.