Willingness to pay for midwife-endorsed product: An Australian best–worst study

References

• Aaker, D. A., & Myers, J. G. (1987). Advertising management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Arcos, F. D., & Loureiro, M. L. (2012). Applying best–worst scaling in a stated preference analysis of forest management programs. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(1), 381–394. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2007). Using best–worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 299–326. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9112-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. B., & Lusk, J. L. (2009). Fairness and food choice. Food Policy, 34(6), 483–491. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, J. and Garland, R. (2010). Product effects on endorser image: The potential for reverse image transfer. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 22(1), 101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Chief nursing officers of England, N. I., Scotland and Wales. (2010). Midwifery 2020: Delivering expectations. Jill Rogers Associates. London, UK: Midwifery 2020 Programme, 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Coltman, T. R., Devinney, T. M., & Keating, B. W. (2011). Best–worst scaling approach to predict customer choice for 3PL services. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(2), 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Crano, W. D. (1970). Effects of sex, response order, and expertise in conformity: A dispositional approach. Sociometry, 33, 239–252. doi:10.2307/2786155
   Google Scholar
• Crisci, R., & Kassinove, H. (1973). Effect of perceived expertise, strength of advice, and environmental setting on parental compliance. The Journal of Social Psychology 89(2), 245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Daneshvary, R., & Schwer, K. (2000). The association endorsement and consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(3), 203–213. doi:10.1108/07363760010328987
   Google Scholar
• Dean, D. H., & Biswas, A. (2001). Third-party organization endorsement of products: An advertising cue affecting consumer pre-purchase evaluation of goods and services. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 41–57. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, K., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities? Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 223–232. doi:10.1086/208671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57–88. doi:10.2307/2393494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, B. Z., Baker, M. J., & Tagg, S. (2001). Selecting celebrity endorsers: The practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(3), 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, T. N. (2010). Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: Recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10(3), 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., Peters, T. J., & Coast, J. (2007). Best–worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. Journal of Health Economics, 26(1), 171–189. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. H., & Friedman, L. (1979). Endorser effectiveness by product type. Journal of Advertising Research, 19(5), 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, G. (2004). Data mining—if only it really were about beer and diapers. Retrieved from http://www.information-management.com/news/1006133-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Giffen, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 104–120. doi:10.1037/h0024833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., Lockshin, L., & Cohen, E. (July 6, 2006). Using the best–worst method to examine market segments and identify different influences of consumer choice. International Wine Business and Marketing Research Conference, Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J. B., & Sarel, D. (1991a). Comparative advertising effectiveness: The role of involvement and source credibility. Journal Advertising, 20(1), 38–45. doi:10.1080/00913367.1991.10673205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J. B., & Sarel, D. (1991b). Effects of price advertisements on perceived quality and purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 22, 195–210. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(91)90001-e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J. B., & Sarel, D. (1992). The influence of type of advertisement, price, and source credibility on perceived quality. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 253–260. doi:10.1007/bf02723412
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M. E., & Bansal, P. (2007). Consumers’ willingness to pay for corporate reputation: The context of airline companies. Corp Reputation Rev 10(3), 189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Heesacker, M., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1990). Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: An elaborative processing perspective. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 30–39. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh, J., & Langteau, R. (2007). Presumed influence of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising on patients: The physician’s perspective. Journal of Advertising, 36(3), 151–172. doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the match-up hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13. doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M. A., Brand, M. J., Hoeke, S. A., & Moe, J. C. (1989). Two-sided versus one-sided celebrity endorsements: The impact on advertising effectiveness and credibility. Journal of Advertising, 18(2), 4–10. doi:10.1080/00913367.1989.10673146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanungo, R. N., & Pang, S. (1973). Effects of human models on perceived product quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 172–178. doi:10.1037/h0037042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenton, S. B. (1989). Speaker credibility in persuasive business communication: A model which explains gender differences. The Journal of Business Communications, 26, 143–157. doi:10.1177/002194368902600204
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A., & Shiv, B. (1998). The effects of source congruity on brand attitudes and beliefs: The moderating role of issue-relevant elaboration. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(1), 25–47. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0701_02
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research 44(2), 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(8), 661–677. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbu, Y. B. H., Bruce, A., & Peterson, R. T. (2012). An examination of humor and endorser effects on consumers’ responses to direct-to-consumer advertising: The moderating role of product involvement. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 6(1), 23–38. doi:10.1108/17506121211216888
   Google Scholar
• Longman, P. (1997). Endorsements for sale. US News and World Report, 123(8), 11.
   Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, J. (1980). Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness and supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 235–244. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley, A. A. J., & Pihlens, D. (2012). Models of best–worst choice and ranking among multiattribute options (profiles). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L. (1998). Relationship marketing: A high-involvement product attribute approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(1), 6–26. doi:10.1108/10610429810209700
   Google Scholar
• Massey, G. R., Waller, D. S., Wang, P. Z., & Lanasier, E. V. (2013). Marketing to different Asian Communities: The importance of culture for framing advertising messages, and for purchase intent. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(1), 8–33. doi:10.1108/13555851311290911
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16(3), 310–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., De Chernatony, L., & Harris, F. (2001). Corporate marketing and service brands: Moving beyond the fast-moving consumer goods model. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 335–352. doi:10.1108/03090560110382057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, A. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 164–182.
   Google Scholar
• Miciak, A. R., & Shanklin, W. L. (1994). Choosing celebrity endorsers. Marketing Management, 3(3), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. W., & McGoldrick, P. J. (1996). Consumers’ risk-reduction strategies: A review and synthesis. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 6(1), 1–33. doi:10.1080/09593969600000001
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., & Umberger, W. J. (2010, September). Pick the tick the impact of health endorsements on consumers’ food choices. Selected Paper prepared for presentation for the 1st Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, Freising, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 10(2), 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, K. (2008). New midwifery students’ views of their future role. Midwives Online, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., Burge, P., Flynn, T., Netten, A., Malley, J., Forder, J., & Brazier, J. E. (2011). Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data. Social Science & Medicine, 72(10), 1717–1727. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth, J. A., & Simonin, B. L. (2003). Brought to you by brand A and brand B. Investigating multiple sponsors’ influences on consumers’ attitudes toward sponsored events. Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 19–30. doi:10.1080/00913367.2003.10639139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Levy, B. (2005). Doctor’s orders—are doctor endorsements the newest prescription for healthy feet? Footwear News. Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-128031510.html
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). Unpacking institutional arguments. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. (1990). The persuasive effect of salesperson credibility: Conceptual and empirical examination. Journal or Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (1998). Matching products with endorsers: Attractiveness versus expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576–586. doi:10.1108/07363769810241445
   Google Scholar
• Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients’ access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(1), 172–182. doi:10.1177/0146167288141017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). The state of the world’s midwifery 2011. Delivering health, saving lives, WHO, Figure 2.2, p. 18. Washington, DC: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar