200
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Designing messages for fluorosis mitigation behavior change: Role of message framing and perceived risk

, , &

References

  • Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22(1), 60.
  • Arlappa, N., Qureshi, A., & Srinivas, R. (2013). Fluorosis in India: An overview. International Journal of Research & Development of Health, 1(2), 97–102.
  • Ayoob, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2006). Fluoride in drinking water: A review on the status and stress effects. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 36(6), 433–487.
  • Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178.
  • Bartels, R. D., Kelly, K. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2010). Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychology and Health, 25(7), 821–838.
  • Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.
  • Brandon, T. H., & Baker, T. B. (1991). The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3(3), 484.
  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control (Vol.26). New York: Academic Press.
  • Brewer, N. T., & Fazekas, K. I. (2007). Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: A theory-informed, systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 45(2), 107–114.
  • Burnkrant, R. E., & Sawyer, A. G. (1983). Effects of involvement and message content on information-processing intensity. Information Processing Research in Advertising, 12(2), 46–64.
  • Chang, C. T. (2007). Health‐care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology and Marketing, 24(2), 143–169.
  • Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Sherman, S. J., Corty, E., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1981). Self-images and cigarette smoking in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(4), 670–676.
  • Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Zimet, G. (2006). Understanding consumer responses to product risk information. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 79–91.
  • Cucchiara, C., Kwon, S., & Ha, S. (2015). Message framing and consumer responses to organic seafood labeling. British Food Journal, 117(5), 1547–1563.
  • Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168.
  • Dollahite, J., Hosig, K. W., White, K. A., Rodibaugh, R., & Holmes, T. M. (1998). Impact of a school-based community intervention program on nutrition knowledge and food choices in elementary school children in the rural Arkansas Delta. Journal of Nutrition Education, 30(5), 289–301.
  • Espejel, J., Fandos, C., & Flavián, C. (2009). The influence of consumer involvement on quality signals perception: An empirical investigation in the food sector. British Food Journal, 111(11), 1212–1236.
  • Farhangmehr, M., Jalali, M. S., & Silva, C. L. (2015). Anti-smoking themes–what works best for adolescents? International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 12(1), 17–35.
  • Fischhoff, B., Watson, S. R., & Hope, C. (1984). Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17(2), 123–139.
  • Fluorosis. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.nhp.gov.in/disease/non-communicable-disease/fluorosis
  • Gallagher, K. M., Updegraff, J. A., Rothman, A. J., & Sims, L. (2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30(2), 145–152. doi: 10.1037/a0022264
  • Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145–153.
  • Hull, S. J., & Hong, Y. (2016). Sensation seeking as a moderator of gain-and loss-framed HIV-test promotion message effects. Journal of Health Communication, 21(1), 46–55.
  • Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. In SV-Proceedings of the third annual conference of the association for consumer research. Retrieved from http://acrwebsite.org/volumes/12016/volumes/sv02/SV-02
  • Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1–47.
  • Joireman, J., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1159–1168.
  • Jung, W. S., & Villegas, J. (2011). The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(3), 219–231.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9682%28197903%2947%3A2%3C263%3APTAAOD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3
  • Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8–18.
  • Latimer, A. E., Rench, T. A., Rivers, S. E., Katulak, N. A., Materese, S. A., Cadmus, L., … Salovey, P. (2008). Promoting participation in physical activity using framed messages: An application of prospect theory. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(4), 659–681.
  • McAlister, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., & Milburn, M. A. (1984). Causes of adolescent cigarette smoking: Tests of a structural equation model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(1), 24–36.
  • Menon, G., Block, L. G., & Ramanathan, S. (2002). We're at as much risk as we are led to believe: Effects of message cues on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 533–549.
  • Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500.
  • Paneth-Pollak, R., Klingler, E. J., Blank, S., & Schillinger, J. A. (2010). The elephant never forgets; piloting a chlamydia and gonorrhea retesting reminder postcard in an STD clinic setting. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(6), 365–368.
  • Quick, B. L., Kam, J. A., Morgan, S. E., Montero Liberona, C. A., & Smith, R. A. (2015). Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: An extension of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Communication, 65(1), 40–61.
  • Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). The Reactance Restoration Scale (RRS): A measure of direct and indirect restoration. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 131–138.
  • Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229–255.
  • Rim, H., Hong Ha, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). The evidence of compelling arguments in agenda building: Relationships among public information subsidies, media coverage, and risk perceptions during a pandemic outbreak. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1), 101–116.
  • Robberson, M. R., & Rogers, R. W. (1988). Beyond fear appeals: Negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self‐esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(3), 277–287.
  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.
  • Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408–433.
  • Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(11), 1355–1369.
  • Shen, L. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30(10), 975–985. DOI:10.1080/10410236.2014.910882
  • Susheela, A. K. (1999). Fluorosis management programme in India. Current Science, 77(10), 1250–1256.
  • Susheela, A. K. (2004). Strategy for Fluorosis Mitigation Program in India. In 4th Int. Workshop on Fluorosis Prevention and Defluoridation of Water, available at http://de-fluoride.net/4thproceedings/129-137.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2014).
  • Toll, B. A., O'Malley, S. S., Katulak, N. A., Wu, R., Dubin, J. A., Latimer, A., … Salovey, P. (2007). Comparing gain-and loss-framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained-release bupropion: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(4), 534.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
  • Yavas, U., Riecken, G., & Babakus, E. (1993). Efficacy of perceived risk as a correlate of reported donation behavior: An empirical analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 65–70.
  • Zhang, H., Sun, J., Liu, F., & Knight, G. J. (2014). Be rational or be emotional: Advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2105–2126.
  • Zimet, G. D., Mays, R. M., Sturm, L. A., Ravert, A. A., Perkins, S. M., & Juliar, B. E. (2005). Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(2), 132–137.
  • Zinkhan, G. M., & Karande, K. W. (1991). Cultural and gender differences in risk-taking behavior among American and Spanish decision makers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 741–742.
  • Zúñiga, M. A., Torres, I. M., & Niculescu, M. (2015). Boundary conditions to the effect of fluency and comprehension on AAD when targeting hispanics vs whites with single meaning vs polysemous slogans. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(3), 145–156.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.