Feeling pressured by health prevention campaigns as a motivational force: Examining the role of visual and verbal mode design features

References

• Auter, P. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159209364165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2018). The number of choice tasks and survey satisficing in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 26(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beege, M., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2017). Look into my eyes! Exploring the effect of addressing in educational videos. Learning and Instruction, 49, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock, H. M. (1969). Theory construction: From verbal to mathematical formulations. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brusch, M., Baier, D., & Treppa, A. (2002). Conjoint analysis and stimulus presentation. A comparison of alternative methods. In Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis. Recent Advances and Applications. (pp. 203–210). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., & Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance. Communicating threats to attitudinal freedom. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook. Developments in theory and practice (pp. 196–212). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Bell, R. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of the impact of point of view on narrative processing and persuasion in health messaging. Psychology & Health, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1894331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Bell, R. A., & Taylor, L. D. (2016). Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: The role of protagonist-reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., McGlone, M. S., & Bell, R. A. (2015). Persuasive effects of linguistic agency assignments and point of view in narrative health messages about colon cancer. Journal of Health Communication, 20(8), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy, K. R. (2018). I, you, or he: Examining the impact of point of view on narrative persuasion. Media Psychology, 21(4), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1400443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrzan, K., & Orme, B. (2000). An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, 98382, 161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Oliver, M. B., & Bilandzic, H. (2019). The differential effects of direct address on parasocial experience and identification: Empirical evidence for conceptual difference. Communication Research Reports, 36(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1530977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (1985). The logic of causal order. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. A., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., Smit, E. G., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2015). Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genette, G. (1990). Narrative discourse revisited. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeken, H., & Fikkers, K. M. (2014). Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Poetics, 44, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J.-J., & Rodríguez-Contreras, L. (2020). Narrative voice matters! Improving smoking prevention with testimonial messages through identification and cognitive processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., & Nan, X. (2018). Role of narratives in promoting mental illnesses acceptance. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1471925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. E., & Wilson, W. C. (1957). Identification and observational learning from films. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 55(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Dahlstrom, M. F., Richards, A., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Communication, 30(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.888629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazione, S. (2016). An investigation of first- versus third-person risk narrative processing through the lens of the heuristic-systematic model. Communication Research Reports, 33(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1155048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, G. J., & Reid, K. (1990). The uses and effects of public service advertising. Public Relations Research Annual, 2(1–4), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0201-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Orme, B. K. (2010). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Research Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 660–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 448–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Tylus, T. (2019). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00056
   Google Scholar
• Rosaen, S. F., Dibble, J. L., & Hartmann, T. (2019). Does the experience of parasocial interaction enhance persuasiveness of video public service messages? Communication Research Reports, 36(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1598854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., Seung, S., Andersen, K. K., & McNeal, D. (2018). The psychological mechanisms of persuasive impact from narrative communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 17(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2017.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J. T., Lienemann, B. A., & Rosenberg, B. D. (2017). Resistance, reactance, and misinterpretation: Highlighting the challenge of persuading people with depression to seek help. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(6), e12322. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 223(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R., & Sangalang, A. (2016). The effect of relational and interactive aspects of parasocial experiences on attitudes and message resistance. Communication Reports, 29(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2016.1148750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeiadis, M., & Shen, F. (2021). Effects of narratives, frames, and involvement on health message effectiveness. Health Marketing Quarterly, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2021.1965824
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei, L., Ferchaud, A., & Liu, B. (2019). Endorser and bodily addressing in public service announcements: Effects and underlying mechanisms. Communication Research Reports, 36(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1524752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance (p. 205). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar