Student Evaluations, Grade Inflation and Pluralistic Teaching: Moving from Customer Satisfaction to Student Learning and Critical Thinking

References

• Arreola , R. A. 2007 . Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems , San Francisco, CA : Anker Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Arum , R. and Roksa , J. 2011 . Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., Roksa, J., & Cho, E. (2011). Improving undergraduate learning: Findings and policy recommendations. Social Science Research Council. Retrieved from http://highered.ssrc.org/files/SSRC_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bain , K. 2004 . What the best college teachers do , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin , T. and Blattner , N. 2003 . Guarding against potential bias in student evaluations: What every faculty member needs to know . College Teaching , 51 ( 1 ) : 27 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Becker , W. E. , William , B. and Watts , M. 2012 . How departments of economics evaluate teaching . The Journal of Economic Education , 43 : 325 – 333 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk , R. A. 2005 . Survey of 12 strategies to assess teaching effectiveness . International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 17 ( 1 ) : 48 – 62 .
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum , M. H. 1999 . A survey of faculty opinions concerning student evaluations of teaching . The Senate Forum. Retrieved from http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbirnbaum/faculty3.htm
   Google Scholar
• Browne , M. N. , Hoag , J. H. , Myers , M. L. and Hiers , W. J. 1997 . Student evaluation of teaching as if critical thinking really mattered . The Journal of General Education , 46 : 192 – 206 .
   Google Scholar
• Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student ratings of instruction: The research revisited. Kansas State University Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Idea Paper 32. Retrieved from http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crumbley , D. L. and Reichelt , K. J. 2009 . Teaching effectiveness, impression management, and dysfunctional behavior: Student evaluation of teaching control data . Quality Assurance in Education , 17 : 377 – 392 .
   Google Scholar
• Emery , C. R. , Kramer , T. R. and Tian , R. G. 2003 . Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness . Quality Assurance in Education , 11 ( 1 ) : 37 – 46 .
   Google Scholar
• Filetti , J. , Mary , W. and King , W. M. 2010 . Grades and ranking: When tenure affects assessment . Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 15 : 1 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Gohmann , S. F. and McCrickard , M. J. 2001 . Tenure status and grade inflation: A time series approach . Journal of the Academy of Business Education , 2 : 1 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Hobson , S. M. and Talbot , D. M. 2001 . Understanding student evaluations: What all faculty should know . College Teaching , 49 ( 1 ) : 26 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , V. E. 2003 . Grade inflation: A crisis in college education , New York, NY : Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kezim , B. , Pariseau , S. E. and Quinn , F. 2005 . Is grade inflation related to faculty status? . Journal of Education for Business , 80 : 358 – 364 .
   Google Scholar
• Knoedler , J. T. and Underwood , D. A. 2003 . Teaching the principles of economics: A proposal for a multi-paradigmatic approach . Journal of Economic Issues , 37 : 697 – 724 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 2007 . “ Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness ” . In Scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective , Edited by: Perry , R. P. and Smart , J. C. Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Martinson , D. L. 2004 . A perhaps ‘Politically Incorrect’ solution to the very real problem of grade inflation . College Teaching , 52 : 47 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Moore , M. and Trahan , R. 1998 . Tenure status and grading practices . Sociological Perspectives , 41 : 775 – 781 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser , F. and Fresko , B. 2002 . Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 2 : 187 – 198 .
   Google Scholar
• Neal , A. D. 2008 . Reviewing post-tenure review . Academe , 94 : 27 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , J. A. 2009 . “ The principles course ” . In The handbook of pluralist economics education , 57 – 68 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Pallett , W. 2006 . “ Uses and abuses of student ratings ” . In Evaluating faculty performance , Edited by: Seldin , P. 50 – 65 . San Francisco, CA : Jossey Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Ryan , J. J. , Anderson , J. A. and Birchler , A. B. 1980 . Student evaluation: The faculty responds . Research in Higher Education , 12 : 317 – 333 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojka , J. , Gupta , A. K. and Deeter-Schmelz , D. R. 2002 . Student and faculty perceptions of student evaluations of teaching: A study of similarities and differences . College Teaching , 50 : 44 – 49 .
   Google Scholar
• Valsan , K. and Sproule , R. 2008 . The invisible hands behind student evaluation of teaching . Journal of Economic Issues , 42 : 939 – 958 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar