560
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Nudging Merit Goods: Conceptual, Normative, and Practical Connections

References

  • Angner, E. (2012). A course in behavioral economics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
  • Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2013). Choice architecture: A mechanism for improving decisions while preserving liberty? In C. Coons & M. Weber (Eds.), Paternalism: Theory and practice (pp. 178–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139179003
  • Brock, D. W. (1988). Paternalism and autonomy. Ethics, 98, 550–565.10.1086/292972
  • Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211–1254.10.2307/3312889
  • Conly, S. (2013). Against autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coons, C., & Weber, M. (2014). Manipulation: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338207.001.0001
  • Dworkin, G. (2014). Paternalism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism/
  • Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frankfurt, H. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68, 5–20.10.2307/2024717
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affection states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its meaning, measurement, and moral importance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Harsanyi, J. (1982). Morality and the theory of rational behavior. In A. Sen & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond (pp. 39–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Haybron, D. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Head, J. G. (1966). On merit goods. Finanz Archiv (new series), 25, 1–29.
  • Hill, C. A. (2007). Anti-anti-anti-paternalism. NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, 2, 444–454.
  • Hurd, H. (2016). Fudging nudging: Why “libertarian paternalism” is the contradiction it claims it’s not. Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, in press.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kirchgässner, G. (in press). Soft paternalism, merit goods, and normative individualism. European Journal of Political Economy.
  • Korobkin, R. (2009). Libertarian welfarism. California Law Review, 97, 1651–1685.
  • Loewenstein, G., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn’t it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 85–105). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlLbty.html
  • Mitchell, G. (2005). Libertarian paternalism is an oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 1245–1277.
  • Musgrave, R. A. (1957). A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanz Archiv (new series), 17, 333–343.
  • Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Musgrave, R. A. (2008). Merit goods. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_M000152
  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rebonato, R. (2012). Taking liberties: A critical examination of libertarian paternalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Saint-Paul, G. (2011). The tyranny of utility: Behavioral social science and the rise of paternalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.10.1515/9781400838899
  • Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 226–248.10.1007/s10602-008-9043-7
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Why nudge? The politics of libertarian paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2015). Do people like nudges? Working paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2604084
  • Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • White, M. D. (2013). The manipulation of choice: Ethics and libertarian paternalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137313577
  • White, M. D. (2014). The illusion of well-being: Economic policymaking based on respect and responsiveness. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137361158
  • White, M. D. (2016a). The crucial importance of interests in libertarian paternalism. In K. Mathis (Ed.), Nudging: Theory and applications (pp. 21–38). New York, NY: Springer.
  • White, M. D. (2016b). Bad medicine: Does the unique nature of health care decisions justify nudges? In I. Glenn Cohen, H. F. Lynch, & C. T. Robertson (Eds.), Nudging health: Health law and behavioral economics (pp. 72–82). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.