1,313
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Understanding Human Well-being: How could Sen’s Capability Approach Contribute?

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245797.001.0001
  • Alkire, S., & Black, R. (1997). A practical reasoning theory of development ethics: Furthering the capabilities approach. Journal of International Development, 9, 263–279.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199703)9:2<>1.0.CO;2-7
  • Biggeri, M., & Ferrannini, A. (2014). Opportunity gap analysis: Procedures and methods for applying the capability approach in development initiatives. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 60–78. doi:10.1080/19452829.2013.837036 10.1080/19452829.2013.837036
  • Binder, M. (2014). Subjective well-being capabilities: Bridging the gap between the capability approach and subjective well-being research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1197–1217. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9471-6
  • Claassen, R. (2011). Making capability lists: Philosophy versus democracy. Political Studies, 59, 491–508.10.1111/post.2011.59.issue-3
  • Clark, D. A. (2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. Journal of Development Studies, 41, 1339–1368. doi:10.1080/00220380500186853
  • Elson, D. (1998). The economic, the political and the domestic: Businesses, states and households in the organisation of production. New Political Economy, 3, 189–208.10.1080/13563469808406349
  • Gandjour, A. (2008). Mutual dependency between capabilities and functionings in Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Social Choice and Welfare, 31, 345–350. doi:10.1007/s00355-007-0283-7
  • Giovanola, B. (2005). Personhood and human richness: Good and well-being in the capability approach and beyond. Review of Social Economy, 63, 249–267. doi:10.1080/00346760500130416
  • Hollywood, E., Egdell, V., McQuaid, R., & Michel-Schertges, D. (2012). Methodological issues in operationalising the capability approach in empirical research: An example of cross-country research on youth unemployment in the EU. Social Work and Society, 10, 1–20.
  • Jackson, W. A. (2005). Capabilities, culture and social structure. Review of Social Economy, 63, 101–124. doi:10.1080/00346760500048048
  • Jackson, W. A. (2013). The desocialising of economic theory. International Journal of Social Economics, 40, 809–825. doi: 10.1108/IJSE-09-2012-0174
  • Jasek-Rysdahl, K. (2001). Applying Sen’s capabilities framework to neighborhoods: Using local asset maps to deepen our understanding of well-being. Review of Social Economy, 59, 313–329.
  • Lawson, T. (2003). Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.
  • Martins, N. (2007a). Ethics, ontology and capabilities. Review of Political Economy, 19, 37–53. doi:10.1080/09538250601080768
  • Martins, N. (2007b). Realism, universalism and capabilities. Review of Social Economy, 65, 253–278. doi:10.1080/00346760701635817
  • Moss, J. (2013). The foundations of well-being. Australian Economic Review, 46, 62–69.10.1111/j.1467-8462.2013.12001.x
  • Nussbaum, M. (1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture, and development: A study of human capabilities (pp. 61–104). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198289642.001.0001
  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841286
  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9, 33–59.
  • Pelenca, J., Bazilec, D., & Cerutid, C. (2015). Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: A case study. Ecological Economics, 118, 226–239. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001
  • Pressman, S., & Summerfield, G. (2000). The economic contributions of Amartya Sen. Review of Political Economy, 12, 89–113.10.1080/095382500106830
  • Qizilbash, M. (2002). Development, common foes and shared values. Review of Political Economy, 14, 464–480.
  • Qizilbash, M. (2005). Sen on freedom and gender justice. Feminist Economics, 11, 151–166. doi:10.1080/13545700500301551
  • Robeyns, I. (2000, December). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined, (0–33). Retrieved from https://merode.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/eng/ew/discussionpapers/Dps00/DPS0030.pdf
  • Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9, 61–92. doi:10.1080/1354570022000078024
  • Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1 10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1
  • Schölmerich, M. J. (2013). On the impact of corporate social responsibility on poverty in Cambodia in the light of Sen’s capability approach. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2, 1–33. doi:10.1007/s13520-012-0016-6
  • Sen, A. (1983). Development: Which way now? The Economic Journal, 93, 745–776.10.2307/2232744
  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency, freedom. The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.
  • Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflict. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities (pp. 123–149). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and wellbeing. In M. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (1997). Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica, 65, 745–779.10.2307/2171939
  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Trani, J. F., Biggeri, M., & Mauro, V. (2013). The multidimensionality of child poverty: Evidence from Afghanistan. Social Indicators Research, 112, 391–416. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0253-7 10.1007/s11205-013-0253-7
  • Zimmermann, B. (2006). Pragmatism and the capability approach: Challenges in social theory and empirical research. European Journal of Social Theory, 9, 467–484. doi:10.1177/1368431006073014 10.1177/1368431006073014

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.