International Organizations and Gender Parity in Education: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)¹

References

• Ahmed, M. (1992). Literacy in a larger context. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 520(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716292520001005
   Google Scholar
• Apodaca, C. (1998). Measuring women’s economic and social rights achievement. Human Rights Quarterly, 20(1), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1998.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, L. (2014). Defying Convention: US Resistance to the UN Treaty on Women’s Rights (Problems of International Politics). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775565
   Google Scholar
• Celik, Y. (2004). The effect of the CEDAW on women’s rights in Turkey. 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S.-Y. (2014). International women’s convention, democracy, and gender equality. Social Science Quarterly, 95(3), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (1979). 34 UN GAOR Supp. No. 21 A/34/46 UN Doc. A/RES/34/180 at 193.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A. P., & Davis, J. W. Jr. (1996). How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer, C. D., Simmons, B. A. (2018). The dynamic impact of periodic review on women’s rights, 81. Law and Contemporary Problems. 31–72. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol81/iss4/3
   Google Scholar
• Creamer, C. D., Simmons, B. A. (2020). The proof is in the process: Self-reporting under international human rights treaties. 114 American Journal of International Law, U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 20-05, Available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3536566 https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.70
   Google Scholar
• Englehart, N. A., & Miller, M. K. (2014). The CEDAW effect: International law’s impact on women’s rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.824274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevrek, D., Guner, S. E. (2020). Management of Economic Development: Gender Parity in Education and Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Society for Advancement of Management International Business Conference Proceedings (pp. 189–195).
   Google Scholar
• Gevrek, D., & Middleton, K. (2016). Globalization and women’s and girls’ health in 192 UN-member countries CEDAW. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(7), 692–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-07-2014-0139
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M. M., Kittilson, M. C., & Sandholtz, W. (2006). Women and globalization: A study of 180 countries, 1975-2000. International Organization, 60(02), 293–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060176
   Google Scholar
• Htun, M., & Weldon, S. (2018). References. In The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women’s Rights Around the World (Cambridge Studies in Gender and Politics) (pp. 303–338). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277891.012
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Pippa, N. (2003). Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). (2010). Recognizing rights, promoting progress: the global impact of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. www.icrw.org
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Research on Women (ICRW). (2016). Recognizing rights, promoting progress: The global impact of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
   Google Scholar
• Jivan, V., & Forster, C. (2005). What would Gandhi say? Reconciling universalism, cultural relativism and feminism through women’s use of CEDAW. Singapore Year Book of International Law, 9, 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H. H. (1998). The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home. Houston Law Review, 35(3), 623–681.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Elimination of Discrimination against Women (OHCHR). (2011). https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CEDAW.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, R. (2001). Los Derechos Humanos en la Politica Exterior Costarricense. Revista Costarricense de Politica Exterior, 1(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. (2004). International law compliance and human rights. 45th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811340
   Google Scholar
• Stromquist, N. P. (1990). Women and illiteracy: The interplay of gender subordination and poverty. Comparative Education Review, 34(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/446905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, S. E. (2004). Global transformations national institutions and women’s rights: Across-national comparative analysis. 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). (2006). Reservations to CEDAW. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reservations.htm
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Data Bank. (2022). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 2 January, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. (2003). Interpreting Islam and women’s rights. International Sociology, 18(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809030183007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1802–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar