Linking Gestures: Cross-Cultural Variation During Instructional Analogies

REFERENCES

• Abrahamson, D. (2007). Handling problems: Embodied reasoning in situated mathematics. In T. Lamberg & L. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty ninth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 219–226). Stateline (Lake Tahoe), NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J.F., & Baddorf, A.K. (2012). Try to see it my way: The discursive function of idiosyncratic mathematical metaphor. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(1), 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M.W., Bassok, M., Solomon, K.O., Syc, S.E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10, 327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M.W., & Nathan, M.J. (2007). Teachers' gestures as a means of scaffolding students' understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B.J. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 349–365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M.W., Nathan, M.J., Wolfgram, M.S., Church, R.B., Jacobs, S.A., Martinez, C.J., & Knuth, E.J., (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32, 65–100. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2013.858161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alibali, M.W., Sylvan, E.A., Fujimori, Y., & Kawanaka, T. (1997). The functions of teachers’ gestures: What's the point? Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral & Social Sciences & Education. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physic problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T. H., Glaser, R. and Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R.S. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 33, pp. 1–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M.T H., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In K.J. Holyoak & R.G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 371–399). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Holyoak, K.J., and Cannon, T.D. (2007). Analogical reasoning in working memory: Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1445–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R.B., Ayman-Nolley, S., & Mahootian (2004). The role of gesture in bilingual education: Does gesture enhance learning?. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7, 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Church, R.R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, D. (1941). Gesture and environment: A tentative study of some of the spatio-temporal and “linguistic” aspects of the gestural behavior of eastern Jews and southern Italians in New York City, living under similar as well as different environmental conditions. New York, NY: King's Crown Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs, (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 52–66). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flevares, L.M., & Perry, M. (2001). How many do you see? The use of nonspoken representations in first-grade mathematics lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 330–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M.J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S.A. Gelman & J.P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 225–277). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Ratterman, M., & Forbus, K. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A.M., & D.A. Robertson (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture's role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 123, 448–453.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009–001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J.A., & Argyle, M. (1975). A cross-cultural study of the communication of extra-verbal meaning by gestures. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, G.S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K.B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., Chui, A.M., … Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. NCES 2003–013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1855–1878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K.J., Junn, E.N., & Billman, D.O. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development, 55, 2042–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A.B., & Alibali, M.W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetter, A.B., & Alibali, M.W. (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the gesture as simulated action framework. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, J.M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication of Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28(2), 164–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M., & Son, J. (2010). Perceptual learning modules in mathematics: Enhancing students’ pattern recognition, structure extraction, and fluency. Topics in Cognitive Science (Special Issue on Perceptual Learning), 2(2), 285–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 175–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, D.R., & Holyoak, K.J. (2000). Transfer and expertise. In E. Tulving & F.I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 109–122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2000). Analogic/analytic representations and cross-linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehus, S., Stevens, R., & Scopelitis, S. (2010, July). Highlighting gesture in explanation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Mannheim, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M.J., & Alibali, M.W. (2007, June). Giving a hand to the mind: Gesture enables intersubjectivity in classrooms. In M.W. Alibali & M.J. Nathan (Eds.), (Co-chairs), Mechanisms by which gestures contribute to establishing common ground: Evidence from teaching and learning. Evanston, IL: Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the International Society for Gesture Studies.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Executive summary: Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Rasmussen, C., Sweeney, G., & Wawro, M. (2012). When the classroom floor becomes the complex plane: Addition and multiplication as ways of bodily navigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 287–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, L.R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, L.R., & Holyoak, K.J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning. Gesture, 2(4), 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richland, L.E., Holyoak, K.J., & Stigler, J.W. (2004). Analogy generation in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L.E., & McDonough, I.M. (2010). Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 28–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L.E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K.J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316, 1128–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J.R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 561–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M.W. (2001), Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopelitis, S.A. (2013). Interactive explanations: The functional role of gestural and bodily action for explaining and learning scientific concepts in face-to-face arrangements (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ResearchWorks Archive, http://hdl.handle.net/1773/23614
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E.A. (2009). Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: What might we learn?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 827–832.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M.A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Children learn when their teacher's gestures and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Radinsky, J., & Goldman, S. (2008). The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes, 45(4), 365–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J.R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). It pays to compare: An experimental study on computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 408–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M.K., Engle, R.A., Smith, M.S., & Hughes, E.K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313–340.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M.L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H.W., & Stigler, J.W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing, and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Summit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, J.W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2012). Bridging the gap between the dense and the discrete: The number line and the “rubber line” bridging analogy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(4), 265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.) (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, J.A., Lau, A., Grewal, S.K., & Holyoak, K.J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar