Unsilencing Critical Conversations in Social-Studies Teacher Education using Agent-based Modeling

References

• Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a New Era of immigration. International Migration Review, 31, 826–874. doi:10.2307/2547416
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2000). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Hammond, R. A. (2003). The evolution of ethnocentric behavior. In proceedings from MPSC '03, the Midwest Political Science Convention. Chicago, IL: Midwest Political Science Association, (pp. 2–30).
   Google Scholar
• Barr, R., Barth, J., & Shermis, S. (1977). Defining the social studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, L. (2002). “ I'm not a racist, but…”: The moral quandary of race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 465–480. doi:10.2307/2657316
   Google Scholar
• Cable, D. (2013). The racial dot map. Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 1–61. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x
   Google Scholar
• Chirot, D. E., & Seligman, M. E. (2001). Ethnopolitical warfare: Causes, consequences, and possible solutions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee system. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 100–148. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dickes, A. C., Sengupta, P., Farris, A. V., & Basu, S. (2016). Development of mechanistic reasoning and multilevel explanations of ecology in third grade using agent-based models. Science Education, 100, 734–776. doi:10.1002/sce.21217
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Desmond, M. (2015). The racial order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2014). Perspectival computational thinking for learning physics: A study of collaborative agent-based modeling. Proceedings from ICLS '14, the 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2010). A national perspective on the effects of high-stakes testing and standardization on elementary social studies marginalization. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38, 114–130. doi:10.1080/00933104.2010.10473418
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., & Mellander, C. (2015). Segregated city: The geography of economic segregation in America's metros. Toronto, Canada: Martin Prosperity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge: And the discourse on language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Promoting transfer by grounding complex systems principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 465–516. doi:10.1080/10508400802394898
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. G., & Salinas, C. (2010). 13 Assessment and accountability in the social studies. In: L. S., Levstik & C. A., Tyson (Eds.). Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 219–234). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., & Larson, J. (1994). Language borders: Recitation as hegemonic discourse. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3, 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, R. A., & Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of ethnocentrism. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 926–936.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. (2005). How do teachers political views influence teaching about controversial issues? Social Education, 69, 47–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, N. I. (1991). The deforming mirror of truth: Slavery and the master narrative of American history. Radical History Review, 1991, 25–48. doi:10.1215/01636545-1991-49-25
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L. (2002). Against presentism. From the President pp. 1–5. Washington, DC: American Historical Association, ( May 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2011). Teachers' controversial issue decisions related to race, gender, and religion during the 2008 presidential election. Theory and Research in Social Education, 39, 348–392. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473459
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. (1998). Communication and opinion. Annual review of political science, 1, 167–197. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.167
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. G., & Ettensoe, R. (1999). Consumer animosity and consumer ethnocentrism: An analysis of unique antecedents. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11, 5–24. doi:10.1300/J046v11n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, J. W. (2007). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, D. E. (2006). Waking up the neighbors: Surveying multicultural and antiracist education in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Multicultural Perspectives, 8, 35–43. doi:10.1207/s15327892mcp0801_7
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist review, 30, 61–88. doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Carbonaro, W. (2001). On the ecology of classroom instruction: The case of writing in high school English and social studies. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 57–81). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa, G. L., & Pineda, D. (2008). Deconstructing power, privilege, and silence in the classroom. Radical History Review, 2008, 45–62. doi:10.1215/01636545-2008-012
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E pluribus…separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Civil Rights Project (Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus…separation-deepeningdouble-segregation-for-more-students).
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. (2011). Feel free to change your mind: A response to “The potential for deliberative democratic civic education.” Democracy & Education, 19(2), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, M. (2004). Race wrestling: Struggling strategically with race in educational practice and research. American Journal of Education, 111, 25–67. doi:10.1086/424719
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Los Angeles, CA: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 153–172. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0702_1
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J., & Banerjee, P. (2013). Kids talking about race: Tween-agers in a post-civil rights era. Sociological Forum, 28, 213–235. doi:10.1111/socf.12016
   Google Scholar
• Rock, T., Heafner, T., Oldendorf, S., Passe, J., O'Connor, K., Good, A., & Byrd, S. (2006). One state closer to a national crisis: A report on elementary social studies in North Carolina schools. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34, 455–483. doi:10.1080/00933104.2006.10473318
   Google Scholar
• Romero, M. (2008). Crossing the immigration and race border: A critical race theory approach to immigration studies. Contemporary Justice Review, 11, 23–37. doi:10.1080/10282580701850371
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. (1989). Representing the colonized: Anthropology's interlocutors. Critical inquiry, 15, 205–225. doi:10.1086/448481
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., Morton, T., Colyer, J., & Fornazzari, S. (2013). The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Toronto, Canada: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2015). A model of historical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Learning electricity with NIELS: Thinking with electrons and thinking in levels. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14, 21–50. doi:10.1007/s10758-009-9144-z
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Farris, A. V., Karan, A., Martin, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Programming in K-12 science classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 58, 33–35. doi:10.1145/2822517
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 351–380. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x
   Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. E. (2011). Becoming white: Reinterpreting a family story by putting race back into the picture. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14, 421–433. doi:10.1080/13613324.2010.547850
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (2016). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a new era of US nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (2013). The new mind of the south. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Dennen, J. M. G. (1995). The origin of war: The evolution of a male-coalitional reproductive strategy, Vols. 1 & 2. Groningen, The Netherlands: Origin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vavrus, M. (2014). Diversity and education: A critical multicultural approach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, W. C. (1998). The fiery cross: The Ku Klux Klan in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., Brady, C. E. & Horn, M. S. (2014). Fostering computational literacy in science classrooms. Communications of the ACM, 57, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2007). Making models match: Replicating an agent-based model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—an embodied modeling approach. Cognition and instruction, 24, 171–209. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (2012). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (2012). Undue certainty: Where Howard Zinn's a people's history falls short. American Educator, Winter 2012–2013, pp. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena—A study of the first not-me possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., & Bankston, C. L., III (1998). Growing up American: The adoption of Vietnamese adolescents in the United States. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zinn, H., & Macedo, D. (2005). On democratic education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar