Articulating the “How,” the “For What,” the “For Whom,” and the “With Whom” in Concert: A Call to Broaden the Benchmarks of our Scholarship

References

• Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition & Instruction, 34(3), 173–193. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community Based Design Research: Learning Across Generations and Strategic Transformations of Institutional Relations Towards Axiological Innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. A. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93(3), 518–533. doi:10.2307/1340546
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social–ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism, and the problem of workers' control. Radical America, 11(6), 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217–233. doi:10.1002/asi.22803
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge, discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, E. N., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2013). Physicians and implicit bias: How doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(11), 1504–1510. doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American psychologist, 65(3), 216. doi:10.1037/a0018957
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. L. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437–447. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Hall, R. (2017). Cognition and instruction in transition. Cognition and Instruction, 35(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1262105
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. N. (2016). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jaramillo, N. E. (2006). Looking for educational equity: The consequences of relying on Brown. National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2014). Relevance to practice as a criterion for rigor. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 19–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X13520289
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Jurow, A. S. (2015). Changing concepts in activity: Descriptive and design studies of consequential learning in conceptual practices. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 173–189. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B. (1989). Oral and literate traditions among Black Americans living in poverty. American Psychologist, 44, 367–373. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.367
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. doi:10.1038/466029a
   Google Scholar
• Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16385–16389. doi:10.1073/pnas.0403723101
   Google Scholar
• Hursch, D. (2005. Neo-liberalism, Market and Accountability: Transforming Education and Undermining Democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 3–15. doi:10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.6
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri R.K., & Meyer L.A., (eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. doi:10.2307/2667054
   Google Scholar
• Jurow, A. S., Teeters, L., Shea, M., & Steenis, E. V. (2016). Extending the consequentiality of “invisible work” in the food justice movement. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 210–221. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1172833
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2008). The Centrality of Culture to the Scienti c Study of Learning and Development: How an Ecological Framework in Educational Research Facilitates Civic Responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279. doi:10.3102/0013189X08322683
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. (2017). Forward: Critical learning opportunities for the Learning Sciences. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the Learning Sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. vii–xii). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S. (2017). How can the Learning Sciences (better) impact policy and practice? Journal of the Learning Sciences. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1404404
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D., Ojalehto, B., Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2017). Systems of (non-)diversity. Nature Human Behavior, 1(0088), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz, I., Paredes, M., & Thorp, R. (2007). Group inequalities and the nature and power of collective action: Case studies from Peru. World development, 35(11), 1929–1946. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. E. (2010). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. W. (2014). How diversity works. Scientific American, 311(4), 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M. (2011). An “ideology in pieces” approach to studying change in teachers' sense-making about race, racism, and racial justice. Cognition & Instruction, 29(3), 297–329. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.583369
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., & Azevedo, F. S. (2017). Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education, 101(4), 526–532. doi:10.1002/sce.21286
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., Olivares-Pasillas, M. C., & Rocha, J. (2016). Becoming racially literate about data and data-literate about race: Data visualizations in the classroom as a site of racial-ideological micro-contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1210418
   Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L. (2006). Mastery and appropriation as means to understand the interplay of history learning and identity trajectories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 221–259. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_3
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, D. L., & Packel, A. K. (2014). Diversity on corporate boards: How much difference does difference make. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 39(2), 377–426.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
   Google Scholar
• Rubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Sullivan, M. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: An investigation of the lottery. Cognition & Instruction, 34(1), 1–26. doi:10.1080/07370008.2015.1118691
   Google Scholar
• Scholars, Feminist (2017). Statement by Feminist scholars on the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States. Retrieved from https://feministscholarstatement.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sikor, T., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2007). Why may forest devoluton not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam's Central Highlands. World Development, 35(11), 2010–2025. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.011
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2001). Measuring the social impact of research: Difficult but necessary. British Medical Journal, 323(7312), 528. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7312.528
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision making: identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 597.
   Google Scholar
• Suškevičs, M., Hahn, T., Rodela, R., Macura, B., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2017). Learning for social-ecological change: A qualitative review of outcomes across empirical literature in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–28. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1339594
   Google Scholar
• Spring, J. (2004). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• The Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a new era of U.S. Nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 91–102. doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1282486
   Google Scholar
• Vakil, S., Royston, M. M. d., Nasir, N. S., & Kirshner, B. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
   Google Scholar
• Von Korff, Y., Daniell, K., Moellenkamp, S., Bots, P., & Bijlsma, R. (2012). Implementing participatory water management: Recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation. Ecology and Society, 17(1). doi:10.5751/ES-04733-170130
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Vakil, S. (Forthcoming). Towards what ends? A critical analysis of militarism, equity and STEM education. In A. Ali & T. L. Buenavista (Eds.), At War!: Challenging Racism, Materialism, and Militarism in Education. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. (2004). The interdependence of social identification and learning. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 715–750. doi:10.3102/00028312041003715
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, M. (2016). Design, participation, and social change: What design in grassroots spaces can teach learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 236–249. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1169818
   Google Scholar