3,462
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

“Look It, This is how You Know:” Family Forest Walks as a Context for Knowledge-Building About the Natural World

References

  • Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, J., Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2010). Positioning place: Polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative Research, 10, 589–604. doi:10.1177/1468794110375796
  • Angelillo, C., Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (2007). Examining shared endeavors by abstracting video coding schemes with fidelity to cases. In R., Goldman, R., Pea, B., Barron, & S. J., Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 189–206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Archibald, J. A. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver UBC press.
  • Bang, M. (2015). Culture, learning, development, and the natural world: The influence of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50, 220–233. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1075402
  • Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., Suzukovich, E., & Strack, G. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets and living Chicago as indigenous land. Environmental Education Research. 20(1), 37–55. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.865113
  • Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature-culture constructs in science learning: Human-non-human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 530–544. doi:10.1002/tea.21204
  • Bang, M., Marin, A., Medin, D., & Washinawatok, K. (2015). Learning by observing, pitching in and being in relations in the natural world. In R. Mejía-Arauz, M. Correa-Chávez, & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Advances in child development behavior: Research on how children learn by observing and contributing in their families and communities (pp. 303–313) Burlington: Academic Press.
  • Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026. doi:10.1002/sce.20392
  • Brayboy, B. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. Urban Review, 37, 425–446. doi:10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y
  • Brayboy, B. M., & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might Native science inform “informal science learning”? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 731–750. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9125-x
  • Brayboy, B. M. J., Gough, H. R., Leonard, B., Roehl, R. F., II, & Solyom, J. A. (2012). Reclaiming scholarship: Critical Indigenous research methodologies. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and design (pp. 423–450). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
  • Brayboy, B. M. J., & Maughan, E. (2009). Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 1–21. doi:10.17763/haer.79.1.l0u6435086352229
  • Burkhart, B. Y. (2004). What coyote and thales can teach us: An outline of American Indian epistemology. In A. Waters (Ed.), American Indian thought: Philosophical essays (pp. 15–26). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light.
  • Callanan, M., Luce, M., Triona, L., Rigney, J., Siegel, D., & Jipson, J. (2012). What counts as science in everyday and family interactions? In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST opportunities: Learning in out-of-school time (pp. 29–48). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5
  • Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M. (1992). Preschoolers' questions and parents' explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7, 213–233. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(92)90012-G
  • Chavajay, P., & Rogoff, B. (1999). Cultural variation in management of attention by children and their caregivers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1079–1090. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1079
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
  • Correa-Chavez, M., Rogoff, B., & Mejia Arauz, R. (2005). Cultural patterns in attending to two events at once. Child Development, 76, 664–678. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00870.x
  • d'Alessio, M. A. (2012). Schoolyard geology as a bridge between urban thinkers and the natural world. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60, 106–113. doi:10.5408/11-246.1
  • Deloria, V., & Wildcat, D. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
  • Dyment, J. E. (2005). Green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning: Barriers and opportunities. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 14(1), 28–45. doi:10.1080/09500790508668328
  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist's world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39–68. doi:10.3102/0034654308325899
  • Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2017). From seeing to observing: How parents and children learn to see science in a botanical garden. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4), 608–642 ( just-accepted). doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1308867.
  • Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge, UK Polity.
  • Fisher, J. A. (2001). The demise of fieldwork as an integral part of science education in United Kingdom schools: A victim of cultural change and political pressure? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 9(1), 75–96. doi:10.1080/14681360100200104
  • Frello, B. (2008). Towards as discursive analytics of movement: On the making and unmaking of movement as an object of knowledge. Mobilities, 3(1), 25–50. doi:10.1080/17450100701797299
  • Gleason, M., & Schauble, L. (1999). Parents' assistance of their children's scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 343–378. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_1
  • Good, J. C. Multitasking and attention in interaction: Dealing with multiple tasks in everyday family life (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (Order No. 3384038).
  • Goodnow, J. J. (1990). The socialization of cognition: What's involved? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology. Essays on comparative human development (pp. 259–286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
  • Goodwin, C. (2006). Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 97–125). Oxford, England: Berg.
  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
  • Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies and changing landscapes. Semiotica, 191, 257–286.
  • Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
  • Hall, R., & Stevens, R. (2016). Interaction analysis approaches to knowledge in use. In A. A. diSessa, M. Levin, & N. J. S. Brown (Eds.), Knowledge and interaction: A synthetic agenda for the learning sciences (pp. 72–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Haury, D. L. (2002). Fundamental skills in science: Observation. ERIC Identifier ED478714. ERIC Digest. Retrieved November 21(2006), 2004–2001.
  • Hutchins, E. (2010). Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 705–715. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x
  • Hutchins, E., & Renner, N. (2012). Situated and embodied learning in the field. In K. A. Kastens & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences (pp. 181–182). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2004). Vitalistic causality in young children's naive biology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 356–362. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.004
  • Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints through the weather-world: Walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, S121–S139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01613.x
  • Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. In H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp.113–153). Oxford, England: Berg.
  • Jipson, J. L., & Callanan, M. A. (2003). Mother-child conversation and children's understanding of biological and nonbiological changes in size. Child Development, 74, 629–644. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402020
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Kahn, Jr., P. H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R. L., Reichert, A. L., & Fowler, E. (2010). A nature language: An agenda to catalog, save, and recover patterns of human–nature interaction. Ecopsychology, 2(2), 59–66. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0047
  • Kawagley, A. O. (2006). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to ecology and spirit (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Keifert, D. T. (2015). Young children participating in inquiry: Moments of joint inquiry and questioning practices at home and in school (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University).
  • Kidwell, M., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2007). Joint attention as action. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 592–611. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.012
  • Kohlhauf, L., Rutke, U., & Neuhaus, B. (2011). Influence of previous knowledge, language, skills and domain-specific interest on observation competency. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 667–678. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9322-3
  • Kong, L. (2000). Nature's dangers, nature's pleasures: Urban children and the natural world. In S. L. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children's geographies (pp. 257–271). London, England: Routledge.
  • Kovach, M. E. (2010). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • Lahlou, S. (2011). How can we capture the subject's perspective? An evidence-based approach for the social scientist. Social Science Information, 50, 607–655. doi:10.1177/0539018411411033
  • Lee, C. D. (2010). Soaring above the clouds, delving the ocean's depths understanding the ecologies of human learning and the challenge for education science. Educational Researcher, 39, 643–655. doi:10.3102/0013189X10392139
  • Lee, V.R. (Ed.), (2015). Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lee, V. R., & Drake, J. (2013). Digital physical activity data collection and use by endurance runners and distance cyclists. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1-2), 1–25. doi:10.1007/s10758-013-9204-2
  • Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. doi:10.3102/0091732X09358129
  • Luce, M. R., Callanan, M. A., & Smilovic, S. (2013). Links between parents' epistemological stance and children's evidence talk. Developmental Psychology, 49, 454–461. doi:10.1037/a0031249
  • Ma, J. Changing local practice for good: Walking scale geometry as designed disruptions for productive hybridity (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06212012-101032/
  • Ma, J. Y. (2017). Multi-party, whole-body interactions in mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 35, 141–164. doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1282485
  • Magntorn, O., & Helldén, G. (2005). Student-teachers' ability to read nature: Reflections on their own learning in ecology. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1229–1254. doi:10.1080/09500690500102706
  • Maltese, A. V., Balliet, R. N., & Riggs, E. M. (2013). Through their eyes: Tracking the gaze of students in a geology field course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(1), 81–88. doi:10.5408/11-263.1
  • Marin, A. M. (2013). Learning to attend and observe: Parent-child meaning making in the natural world. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
  • Marin, A. M. (2014, June). Re-placing walking in the analysis of children's observational inquiry. In J. L., Polman, E. A., Kyza, D. K., O'Neill, I., Tabak, W. R., Penuel, A. S., Jurow, K., O'Connor, T., Lee, & L., D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The international conference of the learning sciences, (ICLS) 2014, Volume 3 (pp. 1240–1241). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  • McCarty, T., & Lee, T. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and Indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101–124. doi:10.17763/haer.84.1.q83746nl5pj34216
  • McCoy, K., Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2016). Land education: Rethinking pedagogies of place from indigenous, postcolonial, and decolonizing perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who's asking?: Native science, western science, and science education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Medin, D., Ojalehto, B., Marin, M., & Bang, M. (2013). Culture and epistemologies: Putting culture back into the ecosystem. In M. Gelfand, C. Y. Chiu, & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (pp. 177–217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Medin, D., Waxman, S., Woodring, J., & Washinawatok, K. (2010). Human-centeredness is not a universal feature of young children's reasoning: Culture and experience matter when reasoning about biological entities. Cognitive Development, 25, 197–207. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.02.001
  • Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119–131). London, England: Academic.
  • Melander, H. (2012). Transformations of knowledge within a peer group. Knowing and learning in interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 232–248. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003
  • Metz, K. E. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 219–290. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_3
  • Mogk, David W., & Goodwin, Charles. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences. In K. A. Kastens & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking & learning in the geosciences (pp. 131–163). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
  • Mundy, P., & Newell, L. (2007). Attention, joint attention, and social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 16, 269–274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x
  • Myers, M. (2011). Walking again lively: Towards an ambulant and conversive methodology of performance and research. Mobilities, 6, 183–201. doi:10.1080/17450101.2011.552775
  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Board on science education, center for education. division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Council, National Research. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Norris, S. P. (1985). The philosophical basis of observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 817–833. doi:10.1002/tea.3660220905
  • Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 37–72. doi:10.1080/01638539209544801
  • Orellana, M. F. (1999). Space and place in an urban landscape: Learning from children's views of their social worlds. Visual Studies, 14(1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/14725869908583803
  • Philip, T. M., & Azevedo, F. S. (2017). Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education, 101, 526–532. doi:10.1002/sce.21286.
  • Pierotti, R. J. (2010). Indigenous knowledge, ecology, and evolutionary biology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies 2: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 64–91). London, England: Sage.
  • Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 153–172. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0702_1
  • Richardson, T. (2011). Navigating the Problem of Inclusion as Enclosure in Native Culture-Based Education: Theorizing Shadow Curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 41, 332–349. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00552.x
  • Richland, L. E., Bjork, R. A., & Linn, M. C. (2007). Cognition and instruction: Bridging laboratory and classroom settings. In F. Durso, R. Nickerson, S. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. Perfect (Eds), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 555–584). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development.: New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Rogoff, B. (2014). Learning by Observing and Pitching In to Family and Community Endeavors: An Orientation. Human Development, 57, 69–81. doi:10.1159/000356757
  • Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejía Arauz, R., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175–203. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
  • Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Sahlström, F. (2009). Conversation analysis as a way of studying learning: An introduction to a special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 103–111. doi:10.1080/00313830902757543
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. Studies in social interaction, 75–119.
  • Shapiro, B. R., & Hall, R. P. (2017, May). Interaction geography in a museum. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2076–2083). Denver, CO: ACM.
  • Sherin, B. L., Krakowski, M., & Lee, V. R. (2012). Some assembly required: How scientific explanations are constructed during clinical interviews. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 166–198. doi:10.1002/tea.20455
  • Siegel, D. R., Esterly, J., Callanan, M. A., Wright, R., & Navarro, R. (2007). Conversations about science across activities in Mexican-descent families. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1447–1466. doi:10.1080/09500690701494100
  • Simpson, L. (2011). Dancing on our turtle's back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg, Canada: Arbeiter Ring.
  • Smith, G., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place- and community-based education in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Smith, B. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2005). Explaining behavior through observational investigation and theory articulation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 315–360. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1403_1
  • Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343–348. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00156-6
  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
  • Stevens, R. (2010). Learning as a members' phenomenon: Toward an ethnographically adequate science of learning. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1), 82–97.
  • Stevens, R. (2012). The missing bodies of mathematical thinking and learning have been found. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 337–346. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.614326
  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp.107–149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids' lives. In K. Salen (Ed.), Ecology of games: MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 41–66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Taylor, K. H. Counter-mapping the neighborhood: A social design experiment for spatial justice (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (Order No. 3575572).
  • Taylor, K. H. (2017). Learning along lines: Locative literacies for reading and writing the city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26, 533–574.
  • Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1-2), 65–93. doi:10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5
  • Tenenbaum, H. R., & Callanan, M. A. (2008). Parents' science talk to their children in Mexican-descent families residing in the USA. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/0165025407084046
  • Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.x
  • Tulbert, E., & Goodwin, M. H. (2011). Choreographies of attention: Multimodality in a routine family activity. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction. Language and body in the material world (pp.79–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Umphress, J., & Sherin, B. L. (2015). The body as viewfinder: Using wearable cameras in learning research. In V. R. Lee Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. (pp. 220–237). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • V.I.O., Inc. (2010). POV.1.5. Retrieved October 2, 2010 from http://www.vio-pov.com.
  • Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86, 206–232. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552. doi:10.1002/tea.1017
  • Willson, V. L. (1987). Theory-building and theory-confirming observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 279–284. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240308
  • Windschitl, M., Dvornich, K., Ryken, A. E., Tudor, M., & Koehler, G. (2007). A comparative model of field investigations: Aligning school science inquiry with the practices of contemporary science. School Science and Mathematics, 107(1), 382–390. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17761.x
  • Woods, D., & Fassnacht, C. (2012). Transana v2.51. Madison, WI: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Retrieved from http://www.transana.org
  • Yazzie-Mintz, T. (2009). Intimately biased: Creating purposeful research in American Indian education with appropriate and authentic methodology. In R. Winkle-Wagner, C.A. Hunter, & D.H. Ortloff (Eds.). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in educational research: Methods at the margins. (pp. 159–170). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Zimmerman, H. T., & McClain, L. R. (2014). Intergenerational learning at a nature center: Families using prior experiences and participation frameworks to understand raptors. Environmental Education Research, 20, 177–201. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.775219
  • Zimmerman, H., Perin, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Parents, science, and interest. Museums & Social Issues, 5(1), 67–86. doi:10.1179/msi.2010.5.1.67
  • Zimmerman, H. T., Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2010). Family sense-making practices in science center conversations. Science Education, 94, 478–505.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.