713
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Access Through Compensation: Emancipatory View of a Mathematics Learning Disability

ORCID Icon &
Pages 424-459 | Received 11 Feb 2017, Accepted 15 Mar 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018

References

  • Ashkenazi, S., Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2009). Attention, automaticity, and developmental dyscalculia. Neuropsychology, 23 (4), 535–540.
  • Ashkenazi, S., Mark-Zigdon, N., & Henik, A. (2009). Numerical distance effect in developmental dyscalculia. Cognitive Development, 24 (4), 387–400.
  • Barnes, C. (2004). “Emancipatory disability research”: Project or process? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2 (1), no–n8.
  • Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing “emancipatory” disability research. Disability & Society, 18 (1), 3.
  • Barton, L. (2005). Emancipatory research and disabled people: Some observations and questions. Educational Review, 57 (3), 317–327.
  • Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38 (4), 333–345.
  • Boaler, J. (2014). Research suggests that timed tests cause math anxiety. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20 (8), 469–474.
  • Borgioli, G. M. (2008). A critical examination of learning disabilities in mathematics: applying the lens of ableism. Journal of Thought, 43 (1-2), 131–147.
  • Bugden, S., & Ansari, D. (2016). Probing the nature of deficits in the “Approximate Number System” in children with persistent Developmental Dyscalculia. Developmental Science, 19 (5), 817–833.
  • Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia Screener. London, UK: nferNelson.
  • Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46 (1), 3–18.
  • Butterworth, B. (2010). Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (12), 534–541.
  • Charlton, J. I. (2000). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Lambert, W., & Hamlett, C. (2012). The cognitive and academic profiles of reading and mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45 (1), 79–95.
  • Defever, E., De Smedt, B., & Reynvoet, B. (2013). Numerical matching judgments in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (10), 3182–3189.
  • Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2012). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 64–81.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (3), 493–513.
  • Furman, T., & Rubinsten, O. (2012). Symbolic and non symbolic numerical representation in adults with and without developmental dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8 (1), 55.
  • Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24 (4), 411–429.
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., & Bailey, D. H. (2012). Fact retrieval deficits in low achieving children and children with mathematical learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45 (4), 291–307.
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88 (2), 121–151.
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78 (4), 1343–1359.
  • Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22 (3), 170–218.
  • Jackson, K., Gibbons, L., & Sharpe, C. J. (2017). Teachers’ views of students’ mathematical capabilities: Challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119 (7), 1–43.
  • Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
  • Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S. E., Starke, M., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., & Wood, G. (2009). Developmental dyscalculia: Compensatory mechanisms in left intraparietal regions in response to nonsymbolic magnitudes. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5 (1), 35.
  • Kling, G., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Assessing basic fact fluency. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20 (8), 488–497.
  • Knox, M., Mok, M., & Parmenter, T. R. (2000). Working with the experts: Collaborative research with people with an intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 15 (1), 49–61.
  • Landerl, K., & Kölle, C. (2009). Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103 (4), 546–565.
  • Lewis, K. E. (2014). Difference not deficit: Reconceptualizing mathematical learning disabilities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45 (3), 351–396.
  • Lewis, K. E. (2016). Understanding mathematical learning disabilities as developmental difference: a fine-grained analysis of one student’s partitioning strategies for fractions/Las discapacidades para el aprendizaje de las matemáticas como diferencia en el…. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 39 (4), 812–857.
  • Lewis, K. E., & Fisher, M. B. (2016). Taking stock of 40 years of research on mathematical learning disability: Methodological issues and future directions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47 (4), 338–371.
  • Maccini, P., McNaughton, D., & Ruhl, K. L. (1999). Algebra instruction for students with learning disabilities: Implications from a research review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22 (2), 113–126.
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M., (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B., Berch & M. M. M., Mazzocco, (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. (pp. 29–47). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2009). Mathematical learning disability in girls with Turner syndrome: A challenge to defining MLD and its subtypes. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15 (1), 35–44.
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M., Devlin, K. T., & McKenney, S. J. (2008). Is it a fact? Timed arithmetic performance of children with mathematical learning disabilities (MLD) varies as a function of how MLD is defined. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33 (3), 318–344.
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschoolers’ precision of the Approximate Number System predicts later school mathematics performance. PLoS ONE, 6 (9), e23749.
  • Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Myers, G. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53 (1), 218–253.
  • Mejias, S., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M.-P. (2012). Numerical estimation in adults with and without developmental dyscalculia. Learning and Individual Differences, 22 (1), 164–170.
  • Mercer, G. (2004). From critique to practice: Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 118–137). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
  • Miura, I. T. (2001). The influence of language on mathematical representations. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics (pp. 53–62). Reston, VA.
  • Munter, C., Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2015). Dialogic and direct instruction: Two distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debate(s) surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117 (11), 1–32.
  • Murphy, M. M., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Hanich, L. B., & Early, M. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40 (5), 458–478.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. Reston, Va.: Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production?. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7 (2), 101–114.
  • Oliver, M. (1997). Emancipatory research: Realistic goal or impossible dream? In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Doing Disability Research (pp. 15–31). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
  • Rapp, R., & Ginsburg, F. (2001). Enabling disability: Rewriting kinship, reimagining citizenship. Public Culture, 13 (3), 533.
  • Riccomini, P. J., Stocker Jr., J. D., & Morano, S. (2017). Implementing an effective mathematics fact fluency practice activity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49 (5), 318–327.
  • Rousselle, L., & Noël, M.-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102 (3), 361–395.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The Math Wars. Educational Policy, 18 (1), 253–286.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., III., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student’s evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 55–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Scotch, R. K., & Schriner, K. (1997). Disability as human variation: Implications for policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 549 (1), 148–159.
  • Shalev, R. S. (2007). Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 49–60). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: where We Are and Where We Need to Go, 9–28. In S. N. Barnartt & B. M. Altman (Eds.). New York, NY: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
  • Skagerlund, K., & Träff, U. (2014). Development of magnitude processing in children with developmental dyscalculia: Space, time, and number. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 675.
  • Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42 (8), 795–819.
  • Stone, E., & Priestley, M. (1996). Parasites, pawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. The British Journal of Sociology, 47 (4), 699–716.
  • Swanson, H.,L. (2007). Cognitive aspects of math disabilities. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 133–146). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
  • Swanson, H. L. (2012). Cognitive profile of adolescents with math disabilities: Are the profiles different from those with reading disabilities? Child Neuropsychology, 18 (2), 125–143.
  • Thaler, L., Arnott, S. R., & Goodale, M. A. (2011). Neural correlates of natural human echolocation in early and late blind echolocation experts. PLoS ONE, 6 (5), e20162.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). Introduction: Fundamental problems of defectology. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 2: The Fundamentals of Defectology. London, New York: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1929.)
  • Walmsley, J. (2004). Inclusive learning disability research: The (nondisabled) researcher’s role. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32 (2), 65–71.
  • Wilhelm, A. G., Munter, C., & Jackson, K. (2017). Examining relations between teachers’ explanations of sources of students’ difficulty in mathematics and students’ opportunities to learn. The Elementary School Journal, 117 (3), 345–370. doi:10.1086/690113

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.