What Does it Mean to Notice my Students’ Ideas in Science Today?: An Investigation of Elementary Teachers’ Practice of Noticing their Students’ Thinking in Science

References

• Act, N. C. L. B. (2002). United States department of education. Section, 625, 104e208.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18(3), 327–356. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00034-6
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 213–233. doi:10.1002/tea.20323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkin, J. M., & Coffey, J. (Eds.). (2003). Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, S., Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. (2010). The construction of knowledge in classroom talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 358–402. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.481013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686. doi:10.1002/tea.20359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397. doi:10.1086/461730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2007). What makes education research ‘‘educational’’? Educational Researcher, 36(9), 529–540. doi:10.3102/0013189X07312896
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. E., & Nieswandt, M. (2010). Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates’ beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 380–401. doi:10.1002/tea.20343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., & Recesso, A. (2006). Promoting reflection among science student teachers using a web-based video analysis tool. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908. doi:10.1002/tea.20385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1987). Teacher planning. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 84–103). London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., & Edwards, A. R. (2016). The role subject matter plays in prospective teachers’ responsive teaching practices in elementary math and science. In. A. Robertson, R. Scherr, and D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 145–161). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colestock, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2009). Teachers’ sense-making strategies while watching video of mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25–42. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023007005
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, E. B., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). Instructional reasoning about interpretations of student thinking that supports responsive teaching in secondary mathematics. ZDM, 48(1-2), 69–82. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0740-1
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1936). Physics and reality. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221(3), 349–382. doi:10.1016/S0016-0032(36)91047-5
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. Sherin, R. Phillip, & V. Jacobs (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gearhart, M., Nagashima, S., Pfotenhauer, J., Clark, S., Schwab, C., Vendlinski, T., … Bernbaum, D. J. (2006). Developing expertise with classroom assessment in K–12 science: Learning to interpret student work. Interim findings from a 2-year study. Educational Assessment, 11(3-4), 237–263. doi:10.1080/10627197.2006.9652990
   Google Scholar
• Gearhart, M., & Saxe, G. B. (2004). When teachers know what students know: Integrating assessment in elementary mathematics. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 304–313. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4304_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. (1994). Teachers’ knowledge. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 10, 2nd ed., pp. 6117–6122). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K., Taboada, A., Davis, M., … Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–119). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. M., & vanZee, E. (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, L., & Guerra, M. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1604_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30. doi:10.1086/428763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers' ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863–895. doi:10.1002/sce.21182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, N., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. doi:10.1002/sce.20013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers' analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 172–181. doi:10.1177/0022487109347875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85(2), 89–110. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<89::AID-SCE10>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, M. (2010). Understanding the dynamics of teacher attention: Case studies of how high school physics and physical science teachers attend to student ideas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi:10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., & Richards, J. (2011). Learning to attend to the substance of students' thinking in science. Science Educator, 20(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86(1), 1–22. doi:10.1002/sce.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineback, J. E. (2015). The redirection: An indicator of how teachers respond to student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 419–460. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.930707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, M. J. (2012). Elementary Teachers’ In-the-Moment Seeing of Children’s Science Thinking. In J. Umphress (Chair), Gearing up: New technologies for participant-collected data. Symposium conducted at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, April 13–7, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, M. J., & Sherin, M. G. (2017). Using a video club design to promote teacher attention to students’ ideas in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 282–294. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLachlan, G., & Reid, I. (1994). Framing experience: “What is it that's going on here?” In G. L. MacLachlan & I. W. Reid (Eds.), Framing and interpretation (pp. 40–67). Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., & Palincsar, A. (2005). Teaching to promote the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning about light at the elementary school level. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn science in the classroom (pp. 421–474). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co‐construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464. doi:10.1002/tea.21007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93–127. doi:10.3102/00346543065002093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. R. Duschl, H. Schweingruber, and A. Shouse. (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497–523. doi:10.1002/tea.20229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development (Vol.985). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI. Varenna, Italy: Italian Physical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, A., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (Eds). (2016). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rop, C. (2002). The meaning of student inquiry questions: A teacher's beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717–736. doi:10.1080/09500690110095294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347–360. doi:10.1177/0022487108322128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322–357. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. J. (2002). Talking to understand science. Advances in Research on Teaching, 9, 197–262. doi:10.1016/S1479-3687(02)80009-8
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. doi:10.1002/tea.20163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284–314. doi:10.1002/tea.21063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174. doi:10.1080/07370000902797379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Models of the teaching process. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243–261. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00031-0
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In: V. Richardson (Ed), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066–1101). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, B. L., Sherin, M. G., Colestock, A. A., Russ, R. S., Luna, M. J., Mulligan, M., & Walkoe, J. (2010). Using digital video to investigate teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010), Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2000). Viewing teaching on videotape. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 36–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383–395). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–168. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940. doi:10.1002/tea.1039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
   Google Scholar
• Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science‐as‐practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. doi:10.1002/sce.21112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers' assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585–609. doi:10.1002/tea.21209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students' understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 189–208. doi:10.1002/tea.21074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 205–216. doi:10.2307/2786752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, M., & Zoest, L. R. (2013). Building coherence in research on mathematics teacher characteristics by developing practice-based approaches. ZDM, 45(4), 583–594. doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0491-9
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Windschitl, M., & Braaten, M. (2013). Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 574–615. doi:10.3102/0002831213476334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphress, J., & Sherin, B. (2014). The body as viewfinder: Using wearable cameras in research. In V. R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (Vol. 135, pp. 220–237). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
   Google Scholar
• V.I.O., Inc. (2009). POV. 1.5. Retrieved September 21, 2009 from http://www.vio-pov.com.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2004). What is high-quality instruction? Educational Leadership, 61(5), 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling and meta-cognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454–462. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar