Beyond Empirical Adequacy: Learning Progressions as Models and Their Value for Teachers

References

• Alonzo, A. C. (2011). Learning progressions that support formative assessment practices. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9, 124–129. doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.599629
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C. (2012). Eliciting student responses relative to a learning progression: Assessment challenges. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 241–254). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C. (2018). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 104–112. doi:10.1080/08957347.2017.1408630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Christensen, J. A. (2017). Using learning progressions in instruction on energy and momentum [Unpublished curriculum materials]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., Christensen, J. A., Hancock, J. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2017). Learning progressions to support TE 407 microteaching [Unpublished curriculum materials]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., de los Santos, X. E., & Kobrin, J. L. (2014, April). Teachers’ interpretations of score reports based upon ordered-multiple choice items linked to a learning progression. In J. Masters (Chair), Diagnostic assessment: Recent advances from psychometric modeling to classroom applications. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A., & Elby, A. (2014). The nature of student thinking and its implications for the use of learning progressions to inform classroom instruction. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, S. Jurow, K. O’Conner, T. Lee, & L. D’Amico. (Eds.). Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 2, pp. 1037–1041). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Elby, A. (2015, April). Physics teachers’ use of learning-progression-based assessment information to reason about student ideas and instructional responses. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Chicago, IL. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3334.1922
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., Neidorf, T., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). Using learning progressions to inform large-scale assessment. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 211–240). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93, 389–421. doi:10.1002/sce.20303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (2008, February). Conceptual and empirical validation of learning progressions. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/ccii/images/stories/ccii_pdfs/learning%20progressions%20anderson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. A., & Adams, M. (1992). Acknowledging the learning styles of diverse student populations: Implications for instructional design. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 49, 19–33. doi:10.1002/tl.37219924904
   Google Scholar
• Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2003). When scientific models represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59–74. doi:10.1080/02698590305238
   Google Scholar
• Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, J. A., Yestness, N., Nilsen, K. J., Kim, J., Hammond, L. M., Carpenter, S.,… Berkowitz, A. R. (2014, March). Learning progression-based teaching strategies in environmental science: Teachers’ successes and struggles in implementation. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21, 49–97. doi:10.1080/03057269308560014
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Wilson, M., & Yao, S.-Y. (2011). Roadmaps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9, 71–123. doi:10.1080/15366367.2011.591654
   Google Scholar
• Blasius, B., Huppert, A., & Stone, L. (1999). Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems. Nature, 399, 354–359. doi:10.1038/20676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., & Alonzo, A. C. (2012). The psychometric modeling of ordered multiple-choice item responses for diagnostic assessment with a learning progression. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 293–316). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., & Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., Circi, R., & McClarty, K. L. (2014, March). Challenges when using an artificial neural network to make diagnostic classifications from ordered multiple choice items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Buell, J. Y., Tayne, K., & Furtak, E. M. (2018, March). Challenges in supporting teachers’ use of learning progressions for formative assessment. In A. C. Alonzo (Chair), Teachers’ use of learning progressions to inform classroom instruction. Related paper set presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41, 1123–1130. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. B., D’Angelo, C. M., & Schleigh, S. P. (2011). Comparison of students' knowledge structure coherence and understanding of force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 207–261. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.508028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1982). Student preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66–70. doi:10.1119/1.12989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 127–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., Barnatt, J., Friedman, A., & Pine, G. (2009). Inquiry on inquiry: Practitioner research and student learning. Action in Teacher Education, 31, 17–32. doi:10.1080/01626620.2009.10463515
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305. doi:10.2307/1167272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. (CPRE Research Report #RR-63). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. doi:10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606–609. doi:10.1002/tea.20316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 655–674. doi:10.1002/tea.20312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elby, A. (2000). What students' learning of representations tells us about constructivism. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 481–502. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00054-2
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C., & McKaughan, D. J. (2014). Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science. Philosophy of Science, 81, 1–21. doi:10.1086/674345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finegold, M., & Gorksy, P. (1991). Students’ concepts of force as applied to related physical systems: A search for consistency. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 97–113. doi:10.1080/0950069910130109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J., & Wiser, M. (2012). The potential of learning progression research to inform the design of state standards. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 435–459). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181–1210. doi:10.1002/tea.21054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. C. (2014). Exploring the influence of learning progressions in two teacher communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 982–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.21156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Swanson, R., de León, V., & Circi, R. K. (2015, April). Learning progressions, formative assessment, and professional development: Results of a longitudinal study. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Morrison, D., & Kroog, H. (2014). Investigating the link between learning progressions and classroom assessment. Science Education, 98, 640–673. doi:10.1002/sce.21122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742–752. doi:10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl, M. J., Leighton, J. P., & Hunka, S. (2007). Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills. In J. P. Leighton & M. J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications (pp. 242–274). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language, 7, 145–171. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1992.tb00202.x
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Learning progressions for multiple purposes: Challenges in using learning progressions. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 461–472). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Learning progressions. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 596–601). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46, 365–388. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9461-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2010). Reasoning up and down a food chain: Using an assessment framework to investigate students’ middle knowledge. Science Education, 94, 259–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., … & DeAngelis, D. L. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science, 310, 987–991. doi:10.1126/science.1116681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2013). Appraising models nonrepresentationally. Philosophy of Science, 80, 850–861. doi:10.1086/673893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., & Salinas, I. (2014, April). Teachers’ uses of learning progression-based tools for reasoning in teaching about water in environmental systems. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1056–1065. doi:10.1119/1.14031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 68(S1), S52–S59. doi:10.1119/1.19520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Goldberg, F. & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Sikorski, T.-R. (2015). Implications of complexity for research on learning progressions. Science Education, 99, 424–431. doi:10.1002/sce.21165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia, S., Furtak, E. M., & Morrison, D. (2012, March). Item context: How organisms used to frame natural selection items influence student response choices. Paper presented at the NARST annual international conference, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Learning_Progressions_Supporting_2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science (Vol. 7). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., & Wells, M. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30, 159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–166. doi:10.1119/1.2343497
   Google Scholar
• Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2001). The changing meanings of force: From coherence to fragmentation. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5–62. Retrieved from the University of Athens website: http://www.cs.phs.uoa.gr/el/staff/vosniadou/force.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180. doi:10.1002/tea.21051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., Shin, H. J., Johnson, M., Jinho, K., & Anderson, C. W. (2014). Promise and problems of learning progression-guided interventions. Retrieved from http://www.pathwaysproject.kbs.msu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CarbonPCK_03242014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469. doi:10.3102/00346543060003419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T., & Bejar, I. I. (2014). Cognitive frameworks for assessment, teaching, and learning: A validity perspective. Psicología Educativa, 20, 117–123. doi:10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, T. (2005). Models, representation, and mediation. Philosophy of science, 72: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1260–1271. doi:10.1086/508124
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17. doi:10.3102/0013189X028004004
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2009). Images of learning, images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 731–735. doi:10.1002/tea.20317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). Learning progressions: The whole world is NOT a stage. Science Education, 99, 432–437. doi:10.1002/sce.21168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307. doi:10.1023/A:1013124409567
   Google Scholar
• May, R. M. (1973a). Qualitative stability in model ecosystems. Ecology, 54, 638–641. doi:10.2307/1935352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, R. M. (1973b). Time-delay versus stability in population models with two and three trophic levels. Ecology, 54, 315–325. doi:10.2307/1934339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., & Smith, L. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348–356. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1983a). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 249, 122–130.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M. (1983b). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–324). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Minstrell, J., Anderson, R., & Li, M. (2011, May). Building on learner thinking: A framework for assessment in instruction. Commissioned paper for the Committee on Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education. National Academies of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., & Anderson, C. W. (2009, June). Teaching experiments and the carbon cycle learning progression. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) conference, Iowa City, IA. Retrieved from http://education.msu.edu/projects/leaps/proceedings/Mohan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675–698. doi:10.1002/tea.20314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2006). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162–188. doi:10.1002/tea.21061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, C., Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). What is this substance? What makes it different? Mapping progression in students’ assumptions about chemical identity. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2438–2461. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.927082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenbaugh, J. (2005). Idealized, inaccurate, but successful: A pragmatic approach to evaluating models in theoretical ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 231–255. doi:10.1007/s10539-004-0478-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 247–255. doi:10.1177/0022487105285963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. (2001). Students' alternative conceptions and scientifically acceptable conceptions about gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 691–706. doi:10.1080/09500690010006527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research, 34(5) Part II, 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, J. L. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Riggan, M., & Oláh, L. N. (2011). Locating interim assessments within teachers’ assessment practice. Educational Assessment, 16(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/10627197.2011.551085
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 205–235.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81, 530–565. doi:10.3102/0034654311423382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1960). What do scientists do? Behavioral Science, 5(1), 1–27. doi:10.1002/bs.3830050102
   Google Scholar
• Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 10–23. doi:10.1039/C3RP00111C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., Young, D. B., Pottenger, F. M. III. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In J. E. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Sterns (Eds.), Assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 21–36). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, B. (2006). Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 535–555. doi:10.1002/tea.20136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikorski, T.-R., & Hammer, D. (2010). A critique of how learning progressions research conceptualizes sophistication and progress. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 1032–1039). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14, 1–98. doi:10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610–631. doi:10.1002/tea.20313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM, 48(1), 1–27. doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y
   Google Scholar
• Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 699–715. doi:10.1002/tea.20308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C. & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 47, 687–715. doi:10.1002/tea.20324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. (2009, June). Towards a model for the development of an empirically tested learning progression. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA. Retrieved from http://education.msu.edu/projects/leaps/proceedings/Stevens.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swackhamer, G., & Hestenes, D. (2005). Energy concept inventory. Retrieved from http://modeling.asu.edu/MNS/MNS.html
   Google Scholar
• Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147–156. doi:10.3102/0013189X12442801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2002). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth, and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 28–47. doi:10.1086/520941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858–867. doi:10.1119/1.16350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2016). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 1385–1418. doi:10.1002/tea.21262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trout, J. D. (2002). Scientific explanation and the sense of understanding. Philosophy of Science, 69, 212–233. doi:10.1086/341050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61–76). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M., Frazier, K. E., & Fox, V. (2013). At the beginning was amount of material: A learning progression for matter for early elementary grades. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Conceptions of matter in science education (pp. 95–122). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M., Smith, C. L., Asbell-Clarke, J, & Doubler, S. (2009, April). Developing and refining a learning progression for matter: The Inquiry Project: Grades 3–5. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wiser, M., Smith, C. L., & Doubler, S. (2012). Learning progressions as tools for curriculum development. In A. C. Alonzo & A. W. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions (pp. 359–403). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Tomita, M. K., & Shavelson, R. J. (2013). Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 531–552. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.787556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar