“It’s Scary but It’s Also Exciting”: Evidence of Meta-Affective Learning in Science

References

• Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1043–1047. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango-Muñoz, S. (2014). The nature of epistemic feelings. Philosophical Psychology, 27(2), 193–211. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.732002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, C. (1865). An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (Henry Copley Greene, Trans). USA: Henry Schuman [1927].
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error-Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: a representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for Long-Term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1936). Physics and reality. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 221(3), 349–382.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., … Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestein, S. (2012). Ignorance: How it drives science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, B. D., Gouvea, J. S., Sawtelle, V., & Turpen, C. (2014). Sources of Affect around Disciplinary Sense Making. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A. (1998). Explanation as Orgasm. Minds and Machines, 8(1), 101–118. doi:10.1023/A:1008290415597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Danielak, B. A., & Elby, A. (2018). Exploring the entanglement of personal epistemologies and emotions in students' thinking. Physical Review of Physics Education Research, 14(010129), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–120). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D. (1965). Messing about in science. Science and Children, 2(5), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016a). Engaging in Science: A Feeling for the Discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D., (2016b). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 1(2), 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: the life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., & Brown, D. E. (1999). "You understand but you don't believe it": Tracing the stabilities and instabilities of interaction in a physics classroom through a multidimensional framework. Cognition & Instruction, 17(1), 93–135. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1701_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R. (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759–771. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2017). Problematizing as a scientific endeavor. Physical Review of Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radoff, J. (2017). Dynamics contributing to the emergence and stability of students’ Scientific engagement over multiple timescales (Doctoral dissertation). Medford, MA: Tufts University.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F., & Hammer, D. (2009). Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 629–642. doi:10.1119/1.3119150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. (Ed.). (1999). The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard P. Feynman. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. D., Atkins, L. J., Levin, D. M., & Richards, J. (2016). What is responsive teaching? In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics (pp.1–35). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16(1), 61–77. doi:10.1080/02698590120118837
   Google Scholar
• Salter, I. Y., & Atkins, L. (2013). Student-generated scientific inquiry for elementary education undergraduates: course development, outcomes and implications. The Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 157–177. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9250-3
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. (2014). Science education's need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383–387. doi:10.1002/sce.21107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A., Greenwood, K. E., Williams, S., Wykes, T., & Rose, D. S. (2013). Hearing the voices of service user researchers in collaborative qualitative data analysis: the case for multiple coding. Health Expectations, 16(4), e89–e99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2002). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2008). Hot thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., Hammer, D., Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Phillips, A. M. (2018). Positioning as not understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 573–599.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L., & Richards, A. (1997). Passionate minds: The inner world of scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When atudents believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar