MySkillsFuture for Students, STEM Learning, and the Design of Neoliberal Citizenship in Singapore

References

• Apple, M. W. (2017). Can STEM be stemmed? An essay review of Andrew Hacker, The math myth and other STEM delusions (New York, NY: The New Press, 2016). Educational Policy, 31(7), 1069–1078. doi:10.1177/0895904816681528
   Google Scholar
• Bahng, A. (2017). Migrant futures: Decolonizing speculation in financial times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2005). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London & NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. doi:10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. doi:10.1159/000345322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. London, UK: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., & Alsop, S. (Eds.) (2014). Activist science and technology education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bencze, L., Reiss, M. J., Sharma, A., & Weinstein, M. (2018). STEM education as “Trojan horse”: Deconstructed and reinvented for all. In L. A. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), 13 questions: Reframing education’s conversation: Science (pp. 69–88). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, K. (2017). Education, industrialization and the end of empire in Singapore. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2018). Critical technocultural discourse analysis. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1012–1030. doi:10.1177/1461444816677532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, E. C. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies: Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 53(6), 628–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1988). The developmental city-state in an open world economy: The Singapore experience. Berkeley roundtable on the international economy (Vol. 31). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. A., & Buell, J. Y. (2018). Of models and myths: Asian(Americans) in STEM and the neoliberal racial project. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 607–625. doi:10.1080/13613324.2017.1377170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesky, N., & Goldstein, R. A. (2018). Packaging girls for STEM or STEM for girls? A critique on the perceived crisis of increasing female representation in STEM education. Critical Education, 9(16), 98–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM education: A critical investigation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (2018). Liberalism disavowed: Communitarianism and state capitalism in Singapore. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, T. (2014). Vocational education in Singapore: Meritocracy and hidden narratives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 637–648. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.927165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCoito, I., Steele, A., & Goodnough, K. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 109–113. doi:10.1080/14926156.2016.1166298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Statistics Singapore (2018). Population Trends 2018. Report. Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/population/population2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Roock, R. S., Bhatt, I., & Adams, J. (2016). Video analysis in digital literacy studies: exploring innovative methods. In C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, H. Snee, & H. Watson (eds). Digital methods for social sciences: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation, Digital Methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Roock, R. S., & Espeña, D. M. (2018). Constructing underachievement: The discursive life of Singapore in US federal education policy. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(3), 303–318. doi:10.1080/02188791.2018.1505600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekbia, H. R., & Nardi, B. A. (2017). Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. (2015). FCJ-186 Hack for good: Speculative labour, app development and the burden of austerity. The Fibreculture Journal, 25 2015: Apps and Affect, 183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunckel, K. L., & Tolbert, S. (2018). The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 938–961. doi:10.1002/tea.21458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2008). The political context of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), 415–422.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM education (pp. 57–78). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, P. (2008). Postcolonial desire: Placing Singapore. Postcolonial Studies, 11(3), 345–361. doi:10.1080/13688790802226736
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. F. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 799–824. doi:10.1177/0162243915578486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. (2017). A Marxist education of the encounter: Althusser, interpellation, and the seminar. Rethinking Marxism, 29(2), 303–317. doi:10.1080/08935696.2017.1358498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. doi:10.1177/1461444816675438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L., & Tan, M. (2018). Culture, pedagogy and equity in a meritocratic education system: Teachers’ work and the politics of culture in Singapore. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 184–202. doi:10.1080/03626784.2018.1435974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S., & Lin, C. (2017). Making and its promises. CoDesign, 13(2), 70–82. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1308518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. B. (2008). E(race)ing race from a national conversation on mathematics teaching and learning: The National Mathematics Advisory Panel as White institutional space. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), 387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Means, A. J. (2018). Platform learning and on-demand labor: Sociotechnical projections on the future of education and work. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 326–338. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1504792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales-Doyle, D. (2017). Justice-centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101(6), 1034–1060. doi:10.1002/sce.21305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Vakil, S. (2017). STEM-focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 376–406. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). Better skills, better jobs, better lives: A strategic approach to skills policies. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2016). Fungible life: Experiment in the Asian city of life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., Bang, M., & Jackson, K. (2018). Articulating the “how,” the “for what,” the “for whom,” and the “with whom” in concert: A call to broaden the benchmarks of our scholarship. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 83–88. doi:10.1080/07370008.2018.1413530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prádanos, L. I. (2018). Postgrowth imaginaries: New ecologies and counterhegemonic culture in post-2008 Spain - Introduction. Modern Languages Open, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.3828/mlo.v0i0.245
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 1031–1051. doi:10.1002/tea.21232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2009). Taking a stand(point): Introduction to a science (education) from people for people. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Science education from people for people: Taking a stand(point) (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, K. J. (2015). Learning from the neo-liberal movement: Towards a global justice education movement. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 315–326. doi:10.1080/00220620.2015.1038697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SkillsFuture Singapore. (n.d.-a). About SkillsFuture. Retrieved from https://www.skillsfuture.sg/AboutSkillsFuture
   Google Scholar
• SkillsFuture Singapore (n.d.-b). About MySkillsFuture. Retrieved from https://www.myskillsfuture.sg/content/student/en/secondary.html
   Google Scholar
• SkillsFuture Singapore (n.d.-c). MySkillsFuture. Retrieved from https://www.myskillsfuture.sg/content/student/en/primary.html
   Google Scholar
• Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez-Villa, L. (2009). Technocapitalism: A critical perspective on technological innovation and corporatism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2011). Anthropological relocations and the limits of design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40(1), 1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, A. (2017, Oct 7). Parliament: Some 1,800 foreign pupils who applied to enter Primary 1 this year rejected. The Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/parliament-some-1800-foreign-pupils-who-applied-to-enter-primary-1-this-year
   Google Scholar
• The Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a new era of U.S. nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Urrieta, L. Jr. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. The Urban Review, 39(2), 107–116. doi:10.1007/s11256-007-0051-0
   Google Scholar
• Vakil, S. (2018). Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review, 88(1), 26–52. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-88.1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil, S., de Royston, M. M., Nasir, N. S., & Kirshner, B. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146. doi:10.5840/enviroethics199012221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1990). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. The Sociological Review, 38(1_suppl), 58–99. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, M. (2016). Design, participation, and social change: What design in grassroots spaces can teach learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 236–249. doi:10.1080/07370008.2016.1169818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar