Examining the Impact of Systemic Tensions on Agency and Identity: The Multiple Positions of Reggie in Production-Centered, Technology-Mediated Activity

References

• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, A. B., & Clark, L. M. (2011). Examining dilemmas of practice associated with the integration of technology into mathematics classrooms serving urban students. Urban Education, 46(6), 1300–1331. doi:10.1177/0042085911416015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.730082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. doi:10.1002/sce.20392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. doi:10.1159/000345322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76–107. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 271–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B., Walter, S. E., Martin, C. K., & Schatz, C. (2010). Predictors of creative computing participation and profiles of experience in two Silicon Valley middle schools. Computers & Education, 54(1), 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73. doi:10.1002/tea.20269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K. (2013). Informing design research: Learning from teachers’ designs of social infrastructure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 258–311. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.691925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridg; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229. doi:10.1080/10508400903530044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. doi:10.3102/0002831207308641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. (2009). An Interpretive Scheme for Analyzing the Identities That Students Develop in Mathematics Classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,40(1), 40–68.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C. & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.) Social Inequality (355–400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., & Allen, C. D. (2016). Hollowed out: Meaning and authoring of high school math and science identities in the context of neoliberal reform. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 188–198. doi:10.1080/10749039.2016.1188962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139814744
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2014). Nobody’s rich and nobody’s poor … It sounds good, but it’s actually not: Affluent students learning mathematics and social justice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 348–391. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.847371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., Brodie, K., Dookie, L., & Takeuchi, M. (2009). Social identities and opportunities to learn: Student perspectives on group work in an urban mathematics classroom. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(2), 18–45.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 714–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2016). Gaming lives in the twenty-first century: Literate connections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L.(1999). Discovery of grounded theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: How technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media & Society, 12(3), 497–513. doi:10.1177/1461444809343560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445–472. doi:10.17763/haer.65.3.r16146n25h4mh384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, V., & Gresalfi, M. (2015). The joint accomplishment of identity. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 190–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1075401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M. (Ed.). (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2012). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119. doi:10.3102/0091732X10383211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. doi:10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2015). From getting “fired” to becoming a collaborator: A case of the coconstruction of identity and engagement in a project-based mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 53–92. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.944643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M., Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2012). Science learning as participation with and in a place. In J. A. Bianichini, V. L. Akerson, A. Calabrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. J. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science (pp. 191–209). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A.(2002).Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. (2010). Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. K., Nacu, D., & Pinkard, N. (2016). Revealing opportunities for 21st century learning: An approach to interpreting user trace log data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 37–87. doi:10.18608/jla.2016.32.4
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity (pp. 269–305). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582–590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Saxe, G. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005014
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Vakil, S. (2017). STEM-focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 376–406. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962/national-science-education-standards.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patchen, T., & Smithenry, D. W. (2014). Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: A cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 606–634. doi:10.1002/tea.21140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R. (2016). Studying science and engineering learning in practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 89–104. doi:10.1007/s11422-014-9632-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Gresalfi, M., Tekinbas, K. S., & Santo, R.(2014). Soft circuits: Crafting e-fashion with DIY electronics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Pinkard, N., Barron, B., & Martin, C. (2008). Digital youth network: Fusing school and after-school contexts to develop youth's new media literacies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on International Conference for the Learning Sciences-Volume 3 (pp. 113–114). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of Mind (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. (2014). From differentiated use to differentiating practices: Negotiating legitimate participation and the production of privileged identities. Information, Communication & Society, 17(6), 670–682. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., Jona, K., Penney, L., Champion, D., Ramey, K. E., Hilppö, J., … Penuel, W. (2016). FUSE: An alternative infrastructure for empowering learners in schools. In 12th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners, ICLS 2016. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, F. R. (2017). Creativity, technology, and learning: Theory for classroom practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, F. R., & Wilson, N. C. (2015). Playful talk: Negotiating opportunities to learn in collaborative groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 5–52. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.839945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2008). Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginny. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(1), 43–71. doi:10.1007/s11422-007-9076-7
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (2014). Engaging girls’ sociohistorical identities in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 392–446. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.888351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2017). Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 437–476. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M., Grant, D., Del Real, G., & Rousseau, M. (2004). Promoting academic literacy with technology: Successful laptop programs in K-12 schools. System, 32(4), 525–537. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. (2014). Interrogating the divide: A case study of student technology use in a one-to-one laptop school. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee, & L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 1, pp. 448–454). Colorado, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. (2017). Sociotechnical and pedagogical barriers to technology integration. In Advancing next-generation teacher education through digital tools and applications (pp. 19–37). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2007). Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a cultural—historical activity theory (CHAT) framework. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 451–484. doi:10.1080/10508400701524777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Haudenschild, M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 507–517. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar