Revisiting Lexington Green: Implications for Teaching Historical Thinking

References

• Barton, K. C. (2005). Primary sources in history: Breaking through the myths. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 745–753. doi:10.1177/003172170508601006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. (2010). “You can form your own point of view”: Internally persuasive discourse in Northern Ireland students’ encounters with history. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 142–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Expert and “novice” problem solving strategies in chess: Sixty years of citing de Groot (1946). Thinking & Reasoning, 14(4), 395–408. doi:10.1080/13546780802265547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakstone, J., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2013). Beyond the bubble in history/social studies assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(5), 53–57. doi:10.1177/003172171309400512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Brown, K. D. (2017). “A spectacular secret:” Understanding the cultural memory of racial violence in K-12 official school textbooks in the era of Obama. Race, Gender & Class, 17(3), 111–125. doi:10.2307/41674755
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. H. (1996). Learning how to learn: The Amherst Project and history education in the schools. The Social Studies, 87(6), 267–273. doi:10.1080/00377996.1996.10114499
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. (1961). What is history? Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Nye, A. (2017). ‘Surprise Me!’ The (im)possibilities of agency and creativity within the standards framework of history education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 656–668. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1104231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329. doi:10.2307/1164355
   Google Scholar
• College Board. (2019). AP world history modern: Course and exam description. AP Central. Retrieved from https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-world-history/course.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2016). Teaching history then and now: A story of stability and change in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X034003003
   Google Scholar
• Duhaylongsod, L., Snow, C. E., Selman, R. L., & Donovan, M. S. (2015). Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Educational Review, 85(4), 587–608. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.4.587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquette, C. (2015). Relating historical consciousness to historical thinking through assessment. In K. Ercikan & P. Seixas (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 51–63). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. J. (1997). In defense of history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fogo, B., Reisman, A., & Breakstone, J. (2019). Teacher adaptation of document-based history curricula: Results of the Reading Like a Historian curriculum-use survey. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 62–83. doi:10.1080/00220272.2018.1550586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A., & Kennett, R. (2018). Conducting the orchestra to allow our students to hear the symphony: Getting richness of knowledge without resorting to fact overload. Teaching History, 171, 8–16. https://www.history.org.uk/publications/resource/9401/conducting-the-orchestra-to-allow-our-students-to.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & Maggioni, L. (2018). Multiple source use in history. In J. L. G. Brasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 205–220. doi:10.4324/9781315627496-12
   Google Scholar
• Hexter, J. H. (1971). The history primer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1965). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. D. Archembault (Ed.), Philosophical analysis and education (pp. 113–138). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, G. (2011). Why was Pitt not a mince pie? Enjoying argument without end: Creating confident historical readers at A-Level. Teaching History, 143, 4–14. https://www.history.org.uk/secondary/resource/4649/creating-confident-historical-readers-at-a-level.
   Google Scholar
• Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C. A. M., van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2017). Toward historical perspective taking: Students’ reasoning when contextualizing the actions of people in the past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 110–144. doi:10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynd, C., Holschuh, J. P., & Hubbard, B. P. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students’ reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(2), 141–210. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber, A. (2016). Translation and its discontents II: A German perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 440–456. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1171401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In J. Bransford & S. Donovan (Eds.), How students learn history, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 31–78). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2014). Fused horizons? UK research into students’ second‐order ideas in history: A perspective from London. In M. Köster, H. Thünemann, & M. Zülsdorf‐Kersting (Eds.), Researching history education: International perspectives and disciplinary traditions (pp. 170–194). Frankfurt/M: Wochenschau Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7-14. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 199–222). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progress and progression models in history. Teaching History, 113(1), 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque, S., & Clark, P. (2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and adaptations. In S. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 119–148). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, J. W. (2008). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logtenberg, A., Van Boxtel, C., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Stimulating situational interest and student questioning through three types of historical introductory texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 179–198. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, L., VanSledright, B., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Walking on the borders: A measure of epistemic cognition in history. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 187–213. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.3.187-214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megill, K. (2007). Historical knowledge, historical error: A contemporary guide to practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mink, L. O. (1966). The autonomy of historical understanding. History and Theory, 5(1), 24–47. doi:10.2307/2504434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96–107. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C., & Reisman, A. (2016). Studying historical understanding. L. Como & E. M. Anderman (Ed.) Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 281–294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery County Public Schools.(2014). United States history: Semester A. Retrieved from: www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/curriculum/socialstudies/high/grade9/US-A%20Overview%201-pager(2).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes, J. D. (2014). Elementary students’ roles and epistemic stances during document-based history lessons. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(3), 375–413. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.937546
   Google Scholar
• Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, G. A. (2009). Testing historical knowledge: Standards, multiple-choice questions and student reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37(3), 325–360. doi:10.1080/00933104.2009.10473401
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012a). The ‘document-based lesson’: Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233–264. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.591436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012b). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.634081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2015). Entering the historical problem space: Whole-class, text-based discussion in history class. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A., Brimsek, E., & Hollywood, C. (2019). Assessment of historical analysis and argumentation (AHAA): A new measure of document-based historical thinking. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 534–561. doi:10.1080/07370008.2019.1632861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A., & Fogo, B. (2016). Contributions of educative document-based curricular materials to quality of historical instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59(1), 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A., & McGrew, S. (2018). Reading in history education: Text, sources, and evidence. In S. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 527–550). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (1993). Studies in metahistory. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (2004). Historical consciousness: Narrative structure, moral function, and ontogenetic development. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing Historical Consciousness (pp. 63–85). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, C. (2019). Academic majors of social studies teachers and student achievement in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84(1), 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 229–272). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ,Segall, A., Trofenko, B. M., Schmitt, A. J. (2018). Critical theory and history education. In S. Metzger, L. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history education and learning (pp. 283, 309). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.,
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2006). What is historical consciousness?. In R. Sandwell (Ed.) To the past: History education, public memory, and citizenship in Canada (pp. 11–22). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2016). Translation and its discontents: Key concepts in English and German history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 427–439. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1101618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2017). A model of historical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 593–605. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. doi:10.1177/1086296X11424071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shemilt, D. (1983). The Devil’s locomotive. History and Theory, 22(4), 1–18. doi:10.2307/2505213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipress, J. M., & Voelker, D. J. (2009). From learning history to doing history: Beyond the coverage model. In R. A. R. Gurung, N. L. Chick, & A. Haynie (Eds.), Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 19–35). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. D. (2018). New multiple-choice measures of historical thinking: An investigation of cognitive validity. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(1), 1–144. doi:10.1080/00933104.2017.1351412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125–157. doi:10.3102/00346543075002125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel, G., Logtenberg, A., Wansink, B., Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2017). Measuring epistemological beliefs in history education: An exploration of naïve and nuanced beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 120–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.03.003
   Google Scholar
• University of the State of New York. (2014). New York State K-12 social studies framework. Retrieved from https://www.engageny.org/resource/new-york-state-k-12-social-studies-framework.
   Google Scholar
• van Boxtel, C., & van Drie, J. (2018). Historical reasoning: Conceptualizations and educational applications. In S. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 149–176). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Dack, H. (2016). From source to evidence? Teachers' use of historical sources in their classrooms. The Social Studies, 107(6), 209–217. doi:10.1080/00377996.2016.1214903.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. (2002). Fifth graders investigating history in the classroom: Results from a researcher-practitioner design experiment design experiment. The Elementary School Journal, 103(2), 131–160. doi:10.1086/499720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B., & Maggioni, L. (2016). Epistemic cognition in history. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.) Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 128–146). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff, L. M. (2012). Historiographic mapping: Toward a signature pedagogy for the methods course. Journal of American History, 98(4), 1114–1126. doi:10.1093/jahist/jar614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., Smith, M., & Breakstone, J. (2018). What is learned in college history classes? Journal of American History, 104(4), 983–993. doi:10.1093/jahist/jax434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar