Teacher Responsiveness that Promotes Equity in Secondary Science Classrooms

References

• Agarwal, P., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2019). Integrating power to advance the study of connective and productive disciplinary engagement in mathematics and science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 349–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students’ discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009–1038. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterman, M. E., & Johnson, H. J. (2013). Video clubs as productive sites for preservice science teachers to interrogate instructional representations. Paper presented at NARST 2013 conference, Puerto Rico, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Elby, A., Richards, J., Walkoe, J., Gupta, A., Russ, R. S., Luna, M. J., … Sherin, M. G. (2014). Differing notions of responsive teaching across mathematics and science: Does the discipline matter? Paperpresented at International Society of the Learning Sciences 2014 convention, Boulder, CO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2009). Formative assessment for secondary science teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2008). Making students’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education, 92(5), 799–824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. A. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee, G. Haertel & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 76–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw and J. Brandsford (Ed.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. Pullin, J. P. Gee, G. Haertel & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Haverly, C., Calabrese Barton, A., Schwarz, C. V., & Braaten, M. (2020). “Making Space”: How novice teachers create opportunities for equitable sense-making in elementary science. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Anderson, C. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99 (5), 863–895. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Thompson, J. (2016). Designing learning opportunities for students that advance scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1316–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Grant, T., & Hammer, D. (2012). Attending and responding to student thinking in science. The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 158–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.3.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108330245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9775-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co‐construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (2015). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker‐Raymond, E. (2016). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1571–1600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 67–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis US.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020103
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., Hagenah, S., Kang, H., Colley, C., Windschitl, M., Stroupe, D., & Braaten, M. (2016). Rigor and responsiveness in classroom activity. Teachers College Record, 118(7), 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, E. A., Hand, V., & Mercado, J. (2017). Making visible the relationship between teachers’ noticing for equity and equitable teaching practice. In E.O. Schack, J. A. Wilhelm & M. H. Fisher (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 251–270). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., & Brand, B. R. (2012). Using critical race theory to analyze science teachers culturally responsive practices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 341–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9380-8
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar