Generalization Across Multiple Mathematical Domains: Relating, Forming, and Extending

References

• Amit, M., & Klass-Tsirulnikov, B. (2005). Paving a way to algebraic word problems using a nonalgebraic route. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(6), 271–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.10.6.0271
   Google Scholar
• Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). “Rising to the challenge”: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM, 40(1), 111–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0069-5
   Google Scholar
• Aranda, C., & Callejo, M.L. (2010). Construction of the concept of linear dependence in a context of dynamic geometry: A case study. Relime, 13(2), 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2007). Factors affecting seventh graders’ cognitive perceptions of patterns involving constructive and deconstructive generalizations. In J.-H. Woo, H.-C. Lew, K.-S. Park, & D.-Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 129–136). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. D. (2006). Sixth graders’ figural and numerical strategies for generalizing patterns in algebra (1). In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 95–101). Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. E. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bills, L., & Rowland, T. (1999). Examples, generalization and proof. In L. Brown (Ed.), Making meaning in mathematics. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 103–116). York, UK: QED. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794809909461549
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2002). Developing elementary teachers’ algebra “eyes and ears”: Understanding characteristics of professional development that promote generative and self-sustaining change in teacher practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Čadež, T. H., & Kolar, V. M. (2015). Comparison of types of generalizations and problem-solving schemas used to solve a mathematical problem. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 283–306.
   Google Scholar
• Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM, 40(1), 3–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7
   Google Scholar
• Chinnappan, M., & Pandian, A. (2009). Malaysian and Australian children’s representations and explanations of numeracy problems. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8(3), 197–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-009-9071-8
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2008). The effect of different representations on Years 3 to 5 students’ ability to generalise. ZDM, 40(1), 23–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0066-8
   Google Scholar
• Davydov, V. V. (1990). Soviet studies in mathematics education: Vol. 2. Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula (J. Kilpatrick, Ed., & J. Teller, Trans.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (Original work published 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, P., & Karunakaran, S. (2016). Why research on proof-oriented mathematical behavior should attend to the role of particular mathematical content. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 44, 65–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfler, W. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Doerfler, W. (1991). Forms and means of generalization in mathematics. In A. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching (pp. 63–85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dorko, A. (2015, November 5–8). Generalizing average rate of change from single- to multivariable functions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 37th, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Dorko, A., & Lockwood, E. (2016, November 3–6). What do students attend to when first graphing planes in R3? North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 38th, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Dorko, A., & Weber, E. (2014). Generalizing calculus ideas from two dimensions to three: How multivariable calculus students think about domain and range. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 269–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.919873
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Darrough, R. L., & Pfannenstiel, K. H. (2015). Developing conceptions and generalizations to build algebraic thinking: The reversibility, flexibility, and generalization approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(5), 273–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214560892
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95–123). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students’ mathematical generalizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 308–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.4.0308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A.B. (2007a). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 221–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701193705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A.B. (2007b). The influence of reasoning with emergent quantities on students’ generalizations. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 439–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A.B., & Grinstead, P. (2008). Hidden lessons: How a focus on slope-like properties of quadratic functions encouraged unexpected generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 277–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.11.002
   Google Scholar
• El Mouhayar, R. (2018a). Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(1), 89–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9821-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Mouhayar, R. (2018b). Levels of generalization and the SOLO taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 5). Umeå, Sweden: PME.
   Google Scholar
• El Mouhayar, R., & Jurdak, M. (2015). Variation in strategy use across grade level by pattern generalization types. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 553–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.985272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L., & Warren, E. (1995). General reasoning processes and elementary algebraic understanding: Implications for instruction. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 17(4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Font, V., & Contreras, A. (2008). The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(1), 33–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9123-7
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory (pp. 185–212). Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract, and the generic. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C. R., Fey, J. T., Hart, E. W., Harold, L. S., & Watkins, A.E. (2015). Core-plus mathematics: Contemporary mathematics in context, course 1. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jurdak, M. E., & El Mouhayar, R. R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 75–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9494-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jureczko, J. (2017). The strategies of using a special kind of number patterns in different stages of education. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(12), 643–652.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0703_3
   Google Scholar
• Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalization strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217440
   Google Scholar
• Lappan, G., Phillips, E. E., Fey, J. T., & Friel, S. (2014). A guide to Connected Mathematics 3: Understanding, implementing and teaching. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (1996). An initiation into algebraic culture through generalization activities. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra (pp. 87–106). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1987). Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of generalization and justification (Research Report). Montreal, Canada: Concordia University, Department of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Kobiela, M., & Weinberg, P. (2013). Cultivating inquiry about space in a middle school mathematics classroom. ZDM, 45(3), 365–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0479-x
   Google Scholar
• Liang, B., & Moore, K. C. (2021). Figurative and operative partitioning activity: Students’ meanings for amounts of change in covarying quantities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(4), 291–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1789930
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001017
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E. (2011). Student connections among counting problems: An exploration using actor-oriented transfer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(3), 307–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9320-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E. (2013). A model of students’ combinatorial thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 251–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E. (2014). A set-oriented perspective on solving counting problems. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., & Gibson, B. R. (2016). Combinatorial tasks and outcome listing: Examining productive listing among undergraduate students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 247–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9664-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., & Reed, Z. (2016). Students’ meanings of a (potentially) powerful tool for generalizing in combinatorics. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, K. Keene, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings for the nineteenth special interest group of the MAA on research on undergraduate mathematics education. Pittsburgh, PA: West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Maj-Tatsis, B., & Tatsis, K. (2018). The use of variables in a patterning activity: Counting dots. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(2), 55–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.309
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to Algebra (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J., Drury, H., & Bills, E. (2007). Explorations in the zone of proximal awareness. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 42–58). Adelaide, Australia: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Mata-Pereira, J., & da Ponte, J.P. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: Teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 169–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Silverman, J., Paoletti, T., Liss, D., & Musgrave, S. (2019). Conventions, habits, and U.S. teachers’ meanings for graphs. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 179–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Stevens, I. E., Paoletti, T., Hobson, N. L. F., & Liang, B. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ figurative and operative graphing actions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J., Beatty, R., McNab, S. L., & Eisenband, J. (2006, April). The potential of geometric sequences to foster young students’ ability to generalize in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center/Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Napaphun, V. (2012). Relational thinking: Learning arithmetic in order to promote algebraic thinking. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35(2), 84–101.
   Google Scholar
• Oflaz, G. (2019). An aspect of generalization act from an actor-oriented transfer perspective. Başkent University Journal of Education, 6(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670406
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., & Lee, K. (2016). How can students generalize the chain rule? The roles of abduction in mathematical modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2331–2352.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1902). The essence of mathematics. In J. R. Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental imagery in the child: A study of the development of imaginal representation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pytlak, M. (2015). Learning geometry through paper-based experiences. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European Society for research in mathematics education (pp. 571–577). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University in Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalizations of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of international group for the psychology of mathematics education, North American Chapter (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mérida: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalization of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40(1), 83–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0061-0
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903569741
   Google Scholar
• Reed, Z. (2018). Undergraduate students’ generalizing activity in real analysis: Constructing a general metric (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/nz8064938.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 5–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/749867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, L. (1996). The role of representation systems in the learning of numerical structures. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 87–102). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D. (2013). Pattern generalization processing of younger and older students: Similarities and differences. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International (Vol. 4, pp. 97–104). Kiel, Germany: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D. (2008). On the pitfalls of abduction: Compolicities and complexities in patterning activity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. (2007). Visualizing as a mathematical way of knowing: understanding figural generalization. The Mathematics Teacher, 101(1), 69–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.101.1.0069
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2016). Middle school students’ patterning performance on semi-free generalization tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 53–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. ZDM, 40(1), 65–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0062-z
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Abduction-induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(2), 140–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2005). Figural and numerical modes of generalizing in algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11(4), 198–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.11.4.0198
   Google Scholar
• Schliemann, A.D., Carraher, D.W., & Brizuela, B.M. (2001). When tables become function tables. Proceedings of the XXV conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 145–152). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 15–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90022-5
   Google Scholar
• Steele, D. (2008). Seventh-grade students’ representations for pictoral growth and change problems. ZDM, 40(1), 97–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0063-y
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1991). The learning paradox: A plausible counterexample. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 26–44). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P. (1990). Mathematics curriculum design: A constructivist’s perspective. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 389–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L.P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory, and application. New York, NY: Praeger Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Strachota, S., Knuth, E., & Blanton, M. (2018). Cycles of generalizing activities in the classroom. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, C. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, M., & Nelson, S.C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasova, H., & Moore, K. (2018). Generalization of an invariant relationship between two “quantities”. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, & A. M. Tyminski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 588–595). Greenville, SC: University of South Carolina & Clemson University.
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, E., & Gatza, A. (2017). The processes and products of students’ generalizing activity. In Galindo, E., & Newton, J., (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 259–266). Indianapolis, IN: Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1985). Experience, problem solving, and learning mathematics: Considerations in developing mathematics curricula. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 189–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, C., Widjaja, W., Herbert, S., Bragg, L., & Loong, E.Y. (2017). Mapping variation in children’s mathematical reasoning: The case of ‘what else belongs?’ International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 873–894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9725-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1997). Homage to Jean Piaget (1896–1980). The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 293–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1997.10558148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans and ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, E., Miller, J., & Cooper, T.J. (2013). Exploring young students’ functional thinking. PNA, 7(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. K. (2014). Productive struggle in teaching and learning middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N. H., & Galarza, P. (2019). Conceptualizing and justifying sets of outcomes with combination problems. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(2), 83–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1392208
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X. (2018). An exploration of the interplay among teacher intervention, dynamic geometry software and students’ mathematical generalizing practices about properties of geometric transformations (Electronic thesis or dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Yeap, B., & Kaur, K. (2008). Elementary school students engaging in making generalisation: A glimpse from a Singapore classroom. ZDM, 40(1), 55–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0072-x
   Google Scholar