References
- Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Texas University Press.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
- Barnhill, D. L. (2002). An interwoven world: Gary Snyer’s cultural ecosystem. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture & Ecology, 6(2), 111–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156853502760260266
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
- Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
- Cohen, L. E. (2015). Play through a Bakhtian lens. In J. E. Johnson, S. G. Eberle, T. S. Henricks, & D. Kuschner (Eds.), The handbook of the study of play (pp. 215–226). Rowan & Littlefield.
- Emerson, C. (1996). Keeping the self intact during the culture wars: A centennial essay for Mikhail Bakhtin. New Literary History, 27(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1996.0006
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press. ix, 586 pp.
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Šabanović, S. (2022). Co-constructing professional vision: Teacher and researcher learning in co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 7–26.
- Kavanagh, S. S., Resnick, A. F., Ghousseini, H., Gotwalt, E. S., Codero-Siy, E., Kasemi, E., & Dutro, E. (2022). Breaking the fourth wall: Reaching beyond observer/performer binaries in studies of teacher and researcher learning. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 126–147.
- Ko, M., Hall, A., & Goldman, S. R. (2022). Making teacher and researcher learning visible: Collaborative design as a context for professional growth. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 27–54.
- Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999 conference (pp. 308–313). International Society of the Learning Science.
- Kyza, E. A., & Agesilaou, A. (2022). Investigating the processes of teacher and researcher empowerment and learning in co-design settings. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 100–125.
- Lee, U.-S. A., DeLiema, D., & Gomez, K. (2022). Equity conjectures: A methodological tool for centering social change in learning and design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 77–99.
- Lefstein, A., & Snell, J. (2011). Professional vision and the politics of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 505–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.004
- Lezotte, S., Krishnamurthy, S., Tulino, D., & Zion, S. (2021). Finding the heart of a research-practice partnership: Politicized trust, mutualism, and use of research. Improving Schools. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802211019914
- Matusov, E. (2007). Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x
- Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters Ltd.
- Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Henson, K., Campanella, M., Patton, R., Rademaker, K., Reed, W., Watkins, D., Wingert, K., Reiser, B., & Zivic, A. (2022). Learning practical design knowledge through co-designing storyline science curriculum units. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 148–170.
- Penuel, W. R., & Hill, H. C. (2019). Building a knowledge base on Research-Practice Partnerships: Introduction to the special topic collection. AERA Open, 5(4), 233285841989195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891950
- Philip, T. M., Pham, J. H., Scott, M., & Cortez, A. (2022). Intentionally addressing nested systems of power in schooling through teacher solidarity co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 55–76.
- Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0183
- Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
- Stahl, G., Cress, U., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2014). Dialogic foundations of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9194-7
- Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Harvard University Press.
- Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.