Entering the Historiographic Problem Space: Scaffolding Student Analysis and Evaluation of Historical Interpretations in Secondary Source Material

References

• Baron, C. (2012). Understanding historic thinking at historical sites. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 833–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benetos, K., & Bétrancourt, M. (2020). Digital authoring support for argumentative writing: What does it change? Journal of Writing Research, 12(vol. 12 issue 1), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blissett, S., Cavalcanti, R., & Sibbald, M. (2015). ECG rhythm analysis with expert and learner-generated schemas in novice learners. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(4), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9572-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blissett, S., Morrison, D., McCarty, D., & Sibbald, M. (2017). Should learners reason one step at a time? A randomized trial of two diagnostic scheme designs. Medical Education, 51(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouie, J. (2019, August 23). Slavery was not a secondary part of our history. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/23/opinion/1619-liberty-slavery-constitution.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. H. (1996). Learning how to learn: The Amherst Project and history education in the schools. The Social Studies, 87(6), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1996.10114499
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Censer, J. (2014). Historians revisit the Terror – Again. Journal of Social History, 48(2), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shu077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (2011). Twist and shout? Developing sixth-form students’ thinking about historical interpretations. Teaching History, 142(1), 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (2016). Developing students’ understanding of historical interpretations. Edexcel/Pearson. https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/A%20Level/History/2015/teaching-and-learning-materials/A_level_History_interpretations_guidance_abridged.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (2017). Historical interpretations. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp. 100–112). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Kapur, M. (2014). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the learning sciences (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology) (pp. 109–127). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2016). Teaching history then and now: A story of stability and change in schools. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallace, T. (2009). John Dewey’s influence on the origins of the social studies: An analysis of the historiography and new interpretation. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallace, T., & Neem, J. N. (2005). Historiographical thinking: Towards a new approach to preparing history teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2005.10473285
   Google Scholar
• Felton, M., & Herko, S. (2004). From dialogue to two-sided argument: Scaffolding adolescents’ persuasive writing. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(8), 672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogo, B., Reisman, A., & Breakstone, J. (2019). Teacher adaptation of document-based history curricula: Results from the Reading Like a Historian curriculum-use survey. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1550586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foner, E. (1988). Reconstruction: America’s unfinished revolution, 1863–1877. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & Maggioni, L. (2018). Multiple source use in history. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 205–220). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gellately, R. (1991). Rethinking the Nazi terror system: A historiographical analysis. German Studies Review, 14(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1430152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iggers, G. (2012). Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From scientific objectivity to the postmodern challenge. Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, L. (2021). Revisiting Lexington Green: Implications for teaching historical thinking. Cognition and Instruction, 39(3), 306–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1880410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Walker, A. E. (2018). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for STEM education: Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber, A. (2016). Translation and its discontents II: A German perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 440–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1171401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2000). Progression in historical understanding among students ages 7–14. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas & S. S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 199–222). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 31–77). National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., & Young, K. M. (1996). Two texts, three readers: Distance and expertise in reading history. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 441–486. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévesque, S., & Clark, P. (2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and adaptations. In S. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 119–148). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid, G. W., & Vinten-Johansen, P. (2000). A catwalk across the great divide: Redesigning the history teaching methods course. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 156–177). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online information: Learning from assessments of civic reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mink, L. O. (1966). The autonomy of historical understanding. History and Theory, 5(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2504434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while writing historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, P. (1988). That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1976). The logic of the social sciences. In T. W. Adorno (Ed.), The Positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 87–104). Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012). The “Document-Based Lesson:” Bringing disciplinary inquiry into high school history classrooms with adolescent struggling readers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 233–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.591436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2015). Entering the historical problem space: Whole-class, text-based discussion in history class. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479–530. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüsen, J. (2004). Historical consciousness: Narrative structure, moral function, and ontogenetic development. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 63–85). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saye, J. W, & SSIRC. (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory and Research in Social Education, 41(1), 89–132.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1994). Confronting the moral frames of popular film: Young people respond to historical revisionism. American Journal of Education, 102(3), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2016). Translation and its discontents: Key concepts in English and German history education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1101618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (2017). A model of historical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(6), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1101363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (Ed.). (2004). Theorizing historical consciousness. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P., & Clark, P. (2004). Murals as monuments: Students’ ideas about depictions of civilization in British Columbia. American Journal of Education, 110(2), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/380573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreiner, T. (2014). Using historical knowledge to reason about contemporary political issues: An expert–novice study. Cognition and Instruction, 32(4), 313–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.948680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. P., Hartmeyer, R., & Bentsen, P. (2017). Systematically reviewing the potential of concept mapping technologies to promote self-regulated learning in primary and secondary science education. Educational Research Review, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.002
   Google Scholar
• van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Dack, H. (2016). From source to evidence? Teachers’ use of historical sources in their classroom. The Social Studies, 107(6), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2016.1214903
   Google Scholar
• Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A., & Oostdam, R. (2016). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1089938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldstreitcher, D. (2020, January 24). The hidden stakes of the 1619 controversy. The Boston Review. http://bostonreview.net/race-politics/david-waldstreicher-hidden-stakes-1619-controversy
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff, L. (2012). Historiographic mapping: Toward a signature pedagogy for the methods course. Journal of American History, 98(4), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jar614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.1976.17.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar