REFERENCES
- Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts’ Law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. Proceedings of the CHI 1997 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Accot, J., & Zhai, S. (2001). Scale effects in steering law tasks. Proceedings of the CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P., Bederson, B., & Zierlinger, A. (2003). Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems. Proceedings of INTERACT 2003. Laxenburg, Austria: IFIP.
- Bi, X., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2013). FFitts law: Modeling finger touch with Fitts’ law. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Blanch, R., Guiard, Y., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004). Semantic oointing: Improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Chapuis, O., Labrune, J. B., & Pietriga, E. (2009). Dynaspot: Speed-dependent area cursor. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391. doi:10.1037/h0055392
- Grossman, T., & Balakrishnan, R. (2005). The bubble cursor: Enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor’s activation area. Proceedings of the CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- ISO 9241-9:2000. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices.
- Jagacinski, R. J., Repperger, D. W., Ward, S. L., & Moran, M. S. (1980). A test of Fitts’ Law with moving targets. Human Factors, 22, 225–233.
- La Viola, J. (1997). Analysis of mouse movement time based on varying control-to-display ratios using Fitts’ law ((Tech. Rep. No. CS-97-17)). Providence, RI: Brown University.
- Liao, M., Jagacinski, R. J., & Greenberg, N. (1997). Quantifying the performance limitations of older and younger adults in a target acquisition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1644–1664.
- MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., Dugas, C., Liske, D., & Eickmeier, B. (1987). Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ task: Implications for control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 39, 629–647. doi:10.1080/14640748708401806
- MacKenzie, I. S. (1992). Fitts’s law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3
- MacKenzie, I. S., & Teather, R. J. (2012). FittsTilt: The application of Fitts’ law to tilt-based interaction. Proceedings of the 2012 Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. New York, NY: ACM.
- McGuffin, M. J., & Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Fitts’ law and expanding targets: Experimental studies and designs for user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 388–422. doi:10.1145/1121112
- Medryk, S., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2013). A comparison of accelerometer and touch-based input for mobile gaming. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Multimedia and Human-Computer Interaction. Ottawa, Canada: International ASET.
- Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Kornblum, S., Wright, C. E., & Keith Smith, J. E. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340–370. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.340
- Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A., & Wright, C. E. (1990). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in aimed movements: Toward a theory of rapid voluntary action. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 173–226). Hague, the Netherlands: IASAP.
- Munoz, L. M. (2012). Scaling Transformation for the Operator Interface in Assisted Teleoperation ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain.
- Munoz, L. M., Casals, A., Frigola, M., & Amat, J. (2011). Motor-model-based dynamic scaling in human–computer interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 41, 435–447. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2010.2057423
- Radix, C., Robinson, P., & Nurse, P. (1999). Extension of Fitts’ law to modeling motion performance in man-machine interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 29, 205–209. doi:10.1109/3468.747855
- Shoemaker, G., Tsukitani, T., Kitamura, Y., & Booth, K. (2012). Two-part models capture the impact of gain on pointing performance. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(4), 28. doi:10.1145/2395131.2395135
- Wobbrock, J. O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S. S., Kimuro, S., & Harada, S. (2009). The angle mouse: Target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. Proceedings of the CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
- Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3(13), 1–119.
- Zaman, S., & MacKenzie, I. S. (2013). Evaluation of nano-stick, foam buttons, and other input methods for gameplay on touchscreen phones. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Multimedia and Human-Computer Interaction. Ottawa, Canada: International ASET.
- Zhai, S., Conversy, S., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Guiard, Y. (2003). Human on-line response to target expansion. Proceedings of the CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.