The Meaning of Interactivity—Some Proposals for Definitions and Measures

REFERENCES

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglements of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity (Advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2011). The human–artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human–Computer Interaction, 26(4), 315–371. doi:10.1080/07370024.2011.626709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A Philosophical inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brende, E. (2005). Better off – flipping the switch on technology. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. (2004). Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. The Information Society, 20, 373–383. doi:10.1080/01972240490508063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucy, E. P., & Tao, -C.-C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9(3), 647–672. doi:10.1080/15213260701283269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2010). The Shallows—What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (Ed.). (2003). HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19. doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. B. (2015). The world beyond your head, on becoming an individual in an age of distraction. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dix, A. (1991). Formal methods for interactive systems. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dix, A. (2003). Upside downs and algorithms – computational formalisms and theory. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufman. p. 381–429.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a digital future—mess and mythology in Ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, E., & McMillan, S. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media Society, (2), 157. doi:10.1177/14614440022225751
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of the DIS 2004 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. (2006, July 5). The age of interruption. The New York Times. p. A17.
   Google Scholar
• Fujinami, K. (2009). Implicit interaction with daily objects: Applications and issues. Proceedings of the 2009 Universal Communication Symposium.New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1667780.1667813
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). Attention shoppers! Wired, 5, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (2013). Focus—The hidden driver of excellence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hallnäs, L., & Redström, J. (2001). Slow technology—Designing for reflection. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 5(3), 201–212. doi:10.1007/PL00000019
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M., & Thimbleby, H. (1990). Formal methods in human–computer interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human–Computer Interaction, 9, 319–349. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., Hollan, J., & Norman, D. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In D. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 87–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Interactable. (n.d.). In English Wiktionary. Retrieved October 31, 2014, from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/interactable
   Google Scholar
• Interactive. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate online dictionary ( 11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interactive
   Google Scholar
• Janlert, L.-E., & Stolterman, E. (2010). Complex interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17, 2. doi:10.1145/1746259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janlert, L.-E., & Stolterman, E. (2015). Faceless Interaction - a conceptual examination of the notion of interface: Past, present and future. Human–Computer Interaction, 30(6), 507–539. doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.944313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, K. (2008, March). Interactivity is evil! A critical investigation of web 2.0. First Monday, 13(3).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity. Nordicom Review, Nordic Research on Media and Communication Review, 19, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. (2008). The concept of interactivity–revisited: Four new typologies for a new media landscape. Proceedings of the UXTV 2008 Conference on Designing Interactive User Experiences for TV and Video. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ju, W. (2015). The design of implicit interactions. Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. (2014). Affordances and design. Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective. Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4, 355. doi:10.1177/146144480200400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguish epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurel, B. (1986). Interface as mimesis. In D. Norman & S. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 67–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, D. (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 63–139. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society, 2, 157. doi:10.1177/14614440022225751
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. (2005). The researchers and the concept: Moving beyond a blind examination of interactivity. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(2), 157–179.
   Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 134–140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here—The folly of technological Solutionism. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. (2004). Human factors in methods for design – making systems human-centered. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. doi:10.1145/301153.301168
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2004). Affordances and design ( Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://jnd.org/dn.mss/affordances_and_design.html
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D., & Draper, S. (Eds.). (1986). User centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, W., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., Banks, R., Regan, T., Selby, M., … Zimmerman, J. (2014). Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: A long term field study of the photobox. Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., & Kuorelahti, J. (2005). Interaction in 4-second bursts: The fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. Proceedings of the CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. (2012). Undesigning technology: Considering the negation of design by design. Proceedings of the CHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Sage annual review of communication research: Advancing communication science (Vol. 16, pp. 110–134). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Retzinger, K. (2009, October 5–7). Confounding definitions: Using a continuum to understand interactivity. Proceedings of the SIGDOC 2009 Conference on Design of Communication. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. (2010). Continuous partial attention: Reconsidering the role of online learning in the age of interruption. Educational Technology, 50(4), 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M., & McCormick, E. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, A., & Victor, D. (1997). The past and future of global mobility. Scientific American, 277, 58–61. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1097-58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk, D. (1999). The end of patience. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A. (2000). Implicit human computer interaction through context. Personal Technologies, 4, 191–199. doi:10.1007/BF01324126
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, P. (2011). What I learned on change islands: Reflections on IT and pace of life. ACM Interactions, 18, 2. doi:10.1145/1925820
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M., & Beck, J. (2014). Slow change interaction design. ACM Interactions, 21(1), 28–35. doi:10.1145/2540069
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1903). Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben. In Die Großstadt. Vorträge und Aufsätze zur Städteausstellung ( Jahrbuch der Gehe-Stiftung Dresden, Band 9; pp. 185–206). Dresden, Germany: Th. Petermann.
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, J. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 33–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E., Jung, H., Ryan, W., & Siegel, M. A. (2013). Device landscapes: A new challenge to interaction design and HCI research. Archives of Design Research, 26(2), 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391–394. doi:10.1080/01972240490508081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svanæs, D. (2000). Understanding interactivity: Steps to a phenomenology of human–computer interaction. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Szalai, A. (Ed.). (1972). The use of time: Daily activities of urban and suburban populations in twelve countries. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, Y. (1979, August). The UMOT Project (Rep. No. DOT-RSPA-DPB-20-79-3). Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar