Translocality in Global Software Development: the Dark Side of Global Agile

References

• Ågerfalk, P. (2006). Towards better understanding of agile values in global software development. Modeling methods for systems analysis and design, EMMSAD. Ireland: University of Limerick, Via Nova Architectura.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S., & Madon, S. (1997). The Indian software industry: Moving towards maturity. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 277–288. doi:10.1080/026839697345008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P. (2003). Re-negotiating protocols: A way to integrate groupware in collaborative learning settings. ECIS, New Paradigms in Organizations, Markets and Society, Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information System, Napoli.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P. (2016). New fundamentals for CSCW research: From distance to politics. Interactions(May-June), 50–53. ACM, SIGCHI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Boulus-Rødje, N. (2015). The multiple intersecting sites of design in CSCW research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 24(3), 319–351.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Christensen, L. R. (2011). Relation work: Creating socio-technical connections in global engineering. European Conference on Computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW). Aarhus, Denmark, Kluwer Academic: 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., Esbensen, M., Jensen, R. E., & Matthiesen, S. (2014). Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM Transaction Computer Human Interaction (Tochi), 21(5), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Hertzum, M. (2006). Project-based collaborative learning: Negotiating leadership and commitment in virtual teams. 5th Conference on Human Computer Interaction in Southern Africa (CHI-SA), Cape Town, South Africa, ACM SIGCHI.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 227–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørn, P., & Østerlund, C. (2014). Sociomaterial-design. Switzerland: Bounding technologies in practice, Springer, International Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J., & Karasti, H. (2013). Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 22(4–6), 373–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, A., Avram, G., Bannon, L., & Wulf, V. (2009). Knowledge management in distributed software development teams: Does culture matter? International conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), Limerick, Ireland, IEEE Press: 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, A., Nett, B., & Wulf, V. (2007). Coordination practices in distributed software development of small enterprises. International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), Munich, Germany, IEEE Press: 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L., & Bjørn, P. (2014). Documentscape: Intertextuallity, sequentiality and autonomy at work. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs: within and Without: Women, Gender, and Theory, 12(4), 678–718.
   Google Scholar
• D’Mello, M. (2005). Thinking local, acting global: Issues of identify and related tensions in global software organizations in India. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 22(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• D’Mello, M., & Sahay, S. (2007). I am kind of a nomad where I have to go places and places… Understanding mobility, place, and identity in global software work from India. Information and organization,17, 162–192. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Esbensen, M., & Bjørn, P. (2014). Routine and standardization in Global software development. GROUP. Sanible Island, Florida, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Esbensen, M., Tell, P., Cholewa, J., Pedersen, M., & Bardram, J. (2015). The dBoard: A digital scrum board for distributed software development. ITS (pp. 161–170). Funchal/Madeira, Portugal: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gertsen, M. C., & Søderberg, A. M. (2011). Intercultural collaboration stories: On narrative inquiry and analysis tools for research in International business. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6), 765–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertsen, M. C., Søderberg, A. M., & Zølner, M. (2012). Global collaboration: Intercultural experiences and learning. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, R. E., Herbsleb, J. D., & Perry, D. E. (1999). The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. GROUP. Phoenix, Arizona USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Havn, E. (1991). In serach of new structures: Issues in designing integrated manufacturing systems. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 1(4), 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J. (2007). Global software engineering: The future of socio-technical coordination. Future of Software Engineering (FOSE). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J., & Mockus, A. (2003). An empirical study of speed and communication in globally-distributed software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., Neeley, T., & Cramton, C. (2014). Language as a lighting rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. Journal of International Business, 45(5), 536–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., Retelny, D., & Cramton, C. (2015). In the flow, being heard, and having opportunities: Sources of power and power dynamics in global teams. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vancouver, BC, Canada, ACM: 864–875.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes, A., & Succi, G. (2012). The dark side of agile software development. Onward! Tucson, Arizona, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2014). Why closely coupled work matters in global software development. GROUP. Sanible Island, Florida, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E., & Bjørn, P. (2012). Divergence and convergence in global software development: Cultural complexities as societal structures. COOP: Design of cooperative systems (pp. 123–136). Grenoble, France: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E., & Nardi, B. (2014). The rhetoric of culture as an act of closure in cross-national software development department. European Conference of Information System (ECIS), Tel Aviv, AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2008). Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 307–332.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, G. (2002). Conventions and commitment in distributed CSCW groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, 11, 349–387.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, S., & Bjørn, P. (2015). Why replacing legacy systems is so hard in global software development: An information infrastructure perspective. CSCW. Vancouver, Canada: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, S., & Bjørn, P. (2016). Lets look outside the office: Analytical lens unpacking collaborative relationships in global work. COOP2016. Trento, Italy: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, S., & Bjørn, P. (2017). When distribution of tasks and skills are fundamentally problematic: A failure story from global software outsourcing. PACM on Human-Computer Interaction: Online First 2018 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1(2, Article 74), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, S., Bjørn, P., & Petersen, L. M. (2014). “Figure out how to code with the hands of others”: Recognizing cultural blind spots in global software development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Baltimore, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mayasandra, R., Pan, S., & Myers, M. (2006). Viewing information technology outsourcing organizations through a postcolonial lens. In E. Trauth, D. Howcroft, T. Butler, B. Fitzgerald, & B. DeGross (Eds), IFIP social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems (Vol. 208, pp. 381–396). New Jersey, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Metiu, A. (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17(4), 418–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naur, P. (1985). Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and Microprograming, 15, 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Some political and cultural issues in the globalisation of software development: Case experience from Britain and India. Information and Organization, 11, 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J., & Olson, G. (2014). Working together apart: Collaboration over the internet. San Rafael, California, USA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, B. (2004). India’s silicon valley or silicon valley’s India? Socially embedding the computer software industry in Bangalore. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 664–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, K., Irani, L., & Dourish, P. (2012). Postcolonial computing: A tactical survey. Science Technology & Human Values, 37(2), 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Poster, W. (2007). Saying ‘good morning’ in the night: The reversal of work time in global ICT service work. Workplace Temporalities: Research in the Sociology of Work, 17, 55–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Myers, M. D. (2013). Information technology offshoring in India: A postcolonial perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, L., Sackmann, S., & Primecz, H. (2011). Culture and negotiated meaning: The value of considering meaning systems and power imbalance for cross-cultural management. In H. Primecz, L. Romani, & S. Sackmann (Eds), Cross-cultural management in practice: Culture and negotiated meanings (pp. 1–17). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shklovski, I., Vertesi, J., & Lindtner, S. (2014). Introduction to this special issue on Transnational HCI. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shome, R. (2006). Thinking through the diaspora: Call centers, India, and a new politics of hybridity. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9, 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Søderberg, A.-M. (2015). Indian boundary spanners in cross-cultural and inter-organizational teamwork: An account from a global software development project. In N. Holden, S. Tietze, & S. Michailova (Eds), Routledge companion to cross-cultural management (pp. 334–343). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Søderberg, A.-M., & Holden, N. (2002). Rethinking cross cultural management in a globalized business world. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2(1), 103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Søderberg, A.-M., Krishna, S., & Bjørn, P. (2013). Global software development: commitment, trust and cultural sensitivity in strategic partnerships. Journal of International Management, 19(4), 347–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søderberg, A.-M., & Romani, L. (2017). Boundary-spanners in global partnerships: A case study of an Indian vendor’s collaboration with Western clients. Group & Organization Management, 42(2), 237–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, C. D., & Redmiles, D. (2007). The awareness network: To whom should I display my action? And, whose actions should I monitor. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), Limerick, Ireland, Kluwer Academic: 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, R. (2006). India and information technology: A historical and critical perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 9(4), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Tøth, T. (2015). Trustworthiness: Enabling global collaboration: An ethnographic study of trust, distance, control, culture and boundary spanning within offshore outsourcing of IT services ( PhD Series 03.2015), Copenhagen Business School, CBS.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P., Febema, P., & Tiwari, V. (2008). Cocreating understanding and value in distributed work: How members of onsite and offshore vendor teams give, make, demand, and break sense. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 227–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2008). ICTs and global working in a non-flat world. IFIP: Information technology in the service economy: Challenges and possibilities (pp. 12–25). Boston, MA, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim, M. B., Chudoba, K., & Crowston, K. (2002). Discontinuities and continuities: A new way to understand virtual work. Information Technology & People, 15(3), 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Lindtner, S., Anderson, K., & Dourish, P. (2014). Multisited design: An analytical lens for Transnational HCI. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(1), 78–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar